Stosh

"I agree they pandered a bit to certain folks, particularly Warren. Warren honestly looked like a deer in headlight at times... then thumped her fist on her talking points. I saw when asked who would support Government run health care for all, only Warren and De Blasio....." Agree, Warren looks like that Agree , Castro performed well , he seemed composed , and seemed to recognize that he had to distinguish himself , by eating Beto. But he ticked me off speaking Spanish ,(same for Booker) , If you don't speak English , you couldn't follow the candidates anyway, and if you do speak English ,I don't see why you should have to be listening to Spanish , in a political context. To me it looked like an open appeal to un-assimilated and fraudulent voters. The one thing I would counter, (for the great majority I think youre on point), I liked Delaney for saying he didn't want to screw with what was actually working. I give him big points for that.

No , They are at fault, thats true.. at least the parent is , the kid I hold innocent but their fate has to be with the parent as far as borders go. But if you lure people into a mine field, aren't you at fault?

I don't know what thing to look at, Who are the pre-debate golden children? If I was them, which I am not , I would pick Harris.

Yeah, I feel that way too sometimes. I guess I am trying to look at things from a more humanitarian angle. I get fed up with the lack of justice though. Did you see the image of the guy who drowned with the little kid? Geesh! Not good. Imo An unsecured border just entices more people to make the attempt , and with more attempts ,more will fail. We do not really know how many people are dying out there, and we don't even really know if the guy rented that kid to scam our detention process. I watched the whole ..' Dem presentation last night, and though they seen fine as people , my impressions are that they are largely wrong and want to do things that are wrong. Why did they appear to call on Warren three times as often as the others? And give more air time to those who spoke over the other candidates? .... If I ran it, the mic gets cut off when their time runs out ,and they all get equal time .. Mid sentence ,Bink ,,,times up. Perhaps have Hannity choose the questions and Bream ask them. But no, they even want to skew the presentations of their own Dem candidates , and prompt them to argue. And I don't see how that could be spun otherwise, If the candidates had been Rep. If I was Inslee or,, Tulsi I would be mad as hell, at being disadvantaged to favor Pocahontas.

If convicts and enemy prisoners can have beds, that is a bit too harsh a means, (to the end which I actually agree with,) ,dealing with these people , some desperate, and some innocent, and some guilty, but still fellow humans.

I saw the news clip showing one person asserting what I paraphrased and a second saying that it was wrong for anyone to profit by supplying the bedding. While it would be fair to say that others have different opinions ,it is 1) at minimum it is an acceptable stance to more Dems than just them , and 2) it is just objective fact that they are opposing the beds being delivered. What is this persuasive argument you imply, that these kids are better off sleeping on the concrete? I just saw Ryan blaming the president for the conditions. So My statement was accurate and free of spin. Whereas You accused me of falsity, and implied a counterargument which you did not specify. ... Just now Beto Also decried the concrete beds, implying that the current admin is at fault.

That's the amazing part, it's factually true ! They are trying to Prevent 1600 mattresses and 1000 beds from ameliorating conditions at the detention center. They literally said, they do not want to improve conditions which would make the situation more acceptable. And yes, you are still welcome to your view, but that doesn't mean I have to sacrifice mine either. I presume you've played some sports, and understand that one can both, fight the fight and respect the foe, In fact ,declining to play whole heartedly, is as cheap a shot as a dirty play.

What else we got? How about a woman spitting on Trump's son's face? Like Waters told them to. What about a woman ...accusing Trump of having had sex with her in a store, 'but it wasn't sexy,, like rape would have been, ' ,,in her opinion. Then she hits on Anderson Cooper ...Who did not appear interested.

I don't know how the quote box got on this.

Tonight, the fun begins, as the Dems realize that if they don't dominate in the debate with each other , they will be watching somebody else walk off with the nomination. All those never -trumpers will just be handed away. Meanwhile,they try to prevent beds 1000 for the detained migrants being sent to the border. Why? They want the kids sleeping on the concrete so they can blame those conditions on Trump! Hey CT Does that not seem unethical??

Reparations is on offer from the spendthrifts. In a generation , or so, after coming here, ,, the kids going to the same schools and so forth , people tend to just see each other as peers foremost . It took the Jim Crow laws to delay the trend , and within a generation of the sixties ( civil rights act) , we had a black president BO . Its the hate mongers like Al Sharpton , who try to keep telling everybody that they are being discriminated against., Meanwhile ..cops come in all shades , employers look at the bottom line firstly , laws have been agreed upon to try to fix the divisions. While there are some who do still want to hold out on the trend , the current generation is quickly rejecting the attitudes of their parents. And yes, the conservative platform is indeed more ethical , rational , and pragmatic. For instance ,, you who are more liberal , is welcome to participate , argue your point , speak your peace , and get treated with common dignity when with conservatives. Not so- the other way around .

Agreed Disagreed- Multiculturalism ( where the groups are intentionally held distinct within the whole ) is not really the American ideal. Our method has become.. melting pot -ism, where the idea is voluntary assimilation into a culture that accepts various nationalities under the same umbrella. We easily find common ground as human beings , we all want good schools for the kids , jobs , free speech , voting rights ,, etc . That is a thing they have to actively try to overcome. It is the Dems who are trying to parse out groups from the whole by offering bribes, to dissuade Americans away from the Nationalist movement ,in which we collectively work together to ensure the rights liberties and benefits of all being American citizens. In Capitalism , one gives in order to get, ( I give labor , so I get money from my employer. ) Socialism, loosens this relationship so that ones economic merits do not serve them, merit (or lack of it) , resides in the decisions of the power structure. Paying people for having dark skin , from the efforts of those who have light skin , is inherently divisive , and the merit ( or lack of it) resides in the decisions of the state ( or tech giant ) . The Dems wish to profit by dividing the people , vilifying,- identity groups , political parties , by skewing our common cause.

Great, the Federal reserve is out of reach of the DNC

Perversion of money ?

Its a matter of time, at some point they will be regulated or broken up much like the telecoms of the past.... It will be harder, the same underling causes prompting are there... Yes ,it would be much harder than the telecoms , so how do you envision they would do it, what would they look like ?

"by who,,,what would be the difference between that and whats going on now....its the same...Like most things it starts our benign and then metastasize into something else like a cancer... no thanks for me...... The thing is the US companies like google helped china make its "social credit" " I totally understand the problem you mention , but consider this, the tech firms are here to stay , Yes? and a solution has to be found for the misuse of it , Yes? Personally I would rather see decentralization , but , if I can't have that, then they can still be a force for good if the execs realize that they are using evil methods , to try to assert a public good. The left likes diversity , right ? so it should be an easy sell, to have them try to promote diversity by presenting not only the items one initially is looking for , but , the alternatives which balance things out. Instead of saying, You might like this , and force-feeding all sorts of items which reinforce the echo-chamber , they could expose people to new ideas that can compete on merit. Broaden markets through advertising . Join the world together. For instance , we generally do not see the news from Manilla , so You click on a news tab for the Philippines , google translate kicks in , and we can hear and participate in the daily news of those people, maybe get a feel for the market forces, see a good travel deal , hear what they have to say about their governance. You are wishing to dominate the product , of an industry which will continue to develop behind the scenes , no matter what you tell them to do. If you control the Tech giants in USA to keep them under control, they will just shift to some other place and leave us at the disadvantage. Its the American way , to promote peace , merit , and unity ,,, by allowing free speech , competition , and diversity. Not to- suppress speech , arbitrarily decide merit , and box out competing groups.

It certainly explains why I couldn't find a map depicting the territorial delimitations of the Persian gulf vs international waters, and why I cannot filter the utub vids in the way that I want. ... y'know, If done properly ,the same algorithms, could be employed to diversify public opinion and bring tolerance n harmony.

I clearly read that which I quoted.

The shoe fits just fine, Sir.

I am not sure where we differ on Arendt's basic point , I think its close enough. The propaganda and skewed presentation of information is wreaking havoc , undermining our constitutional rights , simply by confusing the crap out of everybody. It is like there are two separate data sets , braided together . I talked to some dems , and ask them if they had even heard of several subjects, Hunter Biden , proj. Dragonfly , and it was like they just 'stepped off the boat' , they never even heard of it , or it just didn't register as significant. In short, the media giants want to regulate American speech , so it fits with what would be allowable in Communist China , so they can integrate the markets, and control the population. The Tech giants are a far more difficult issue than border control. I am thinking that the only hope to reconcile what the two groups see, is people being punished , and election results, because those are not just a matter of personal opinion. I wouldn't care to push the Reps to accelerate the slow -roll -out of info , but 1) such talking points aren't going to fix anything and 2) it takes time to get from indictment, to sentencing.

The legality of their status , is up to the US and its laws. They don't have a right to declare that they are here legally. That is for a US court to determine.

There's a crux where talking points are meaningless, they don't think being a sponsor of worldwide terrorism ,and thereby looking illegit isn't enough to stop them from their plan , because the people suffer , while the leadership is supported in retaliation, ( its just like what the Dems are doing) . Our allies will still be mostly with us , and our enemies will remain mostly against us. So just deal with the issue , and ignore the imaginary and cowardly court of world opinion. I support Trump whether he chooses to take the thing in stride , or , if he chooses to blast the heck out of their military installations.

The title is wrong, you cant reward terrorism and have it go away, again, you are looking at the job title and dispensing with thinking for yourself. Other people disagree with Clark ,- that giving 150 Billion dollars back to Iran plus interest ! , and getting lip service in return , is beyond just stupid.

See? Trunk thinks we have to keep our allies and Iran happy, or we will be isolated , not that Iran is Isolated and having hard economic times because of being a terrorist state ,instead , he thinks we are the 'bad ones' , for trying to control the terrorists. This kind of world view makes Americans take a weak stance, with a policy of appeasement, like BO. Its backwards, makes no sense , and the reason to see it this way is that fits in his echo chamber. TDS.

Yeah,, nice clipping Windwalker. I saw it mentioned on Bongino's show. It reminds me of the guy who said.. If we don't impeach him, he's going to be re-elected! 😁