Buckwilde Posted June 20, 2009 I'm Nick and started to observe my breathing about a year and half ago after nearly drinking myself to death... Now I have completed a degree where I looked at the developments in neuroscience and their applications to media. Lots of EEg tests on muscians and MC's to see their brainwave activity under performance conditions. Now I'm goign to do a masters and look at the memory and communication property's of water and the non local nature of Hydrogen atoms and the way they may be able to communicate instantly and accross vast distances. I have an interest in 'remote viewing' for the same reasons. looking forward to delthing into these forums and finding more things to research...I am aware that the philosophy is that to 'Know nothing is to know everything' but I can't help but want to find out about the origins of the universe(s) and the self. many thanks Nick [email protected] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Josh Young Posted June 21, 2009 Hi Nick! Allow me to offer that if the thermodynamic laws are correct then time cannot be linear. Since time and space are also related then space is not-linear. This means that the idea of communication across vast distances must be seen as an artifact of perception. There is neither time nor distance, just the interaction that allows us to observe and experience in a subjective sense the existence of time and space. There is in effect no line, no clear division in time and space, between the protons you study. The answer is extra-dimensional, what we call the big bang is a constant event that is the dimensional origin of time/space. we however project the criteria of subjective experience upon the nature of the universe and so believe that time and space is linear, however this idea cannot be reconciled with the thermodynamic law that states that energy cannot be created nor destroyed. The conflation of the observation of particle interaction with the existence of particles relates to this too. Particles, like linear time, are an artifact of perception. No moment and no particle is actually independent of any other. This is why there is the Heisenberg uncertainty, because particle is an artifact. I'd love to exchange ideas with you, if you are interested I'll email you, if what I write strikes you as naive and misinformed however then feel free to let it drop right now. Enjoy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buckwilde Posted June 21, 2009 Good responce. The videos of the EEG experiments are below: http://ibvabrainwaves.blip.tv/file/1999619/ http://ibvabrainwaves.blip.tv/file/1999658/ http://ibvabrainwaves.blip.tv/file/1999547/ 10, 000 hours of practice pays off, is the bottom line with talent.... When you are in a state of 'flow', you are calm, but hectic at once. Look at the descriptions below the videos and the difference between the last video and the first on the read out, its totally different .. cos JFB has practiced like a mutha fucka basically N Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Josh Young Posted June 22, 2009 I want to see the same type of study made but including hindu devotional musicians. I'd like to see the brainwaves of devotees making music compared to the brainwaves of people who perform for other reasons. I'd scope the waves of people chanting mantras and doing doing devotional dance as well. Your videos are compelling. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
