Sexual vocabulary

[Tao99]

Edited July 9, 2010 by Tao99

[TheSongsofDistantEarth]

I'd get banned for a week if I suggested you change your name from "Tao99" to "Standard Definition thankyou99", so I wont suggest it.

 

 

Have a good day.

+1

[Tao99]

Edited July 9, 2010 by Tao99

[Vanir Thunder Dojo Tan]

cat, on 01 July 2010 - 07:54 AM, said:

I'd get banned for a week if I suggested you change your name from "Tao99" to "Standard Definition thankyou99", so I wont suggest it.

 

 

What's your point? Are we supposed to guess? Is that just a popularity vote? Are you saying you don't use standard dictionary definitions? Then how are we communicating now?

 

 

 

Dictionary as reference to communication begets confusion.

 

 

Love as a reference to communication begets understanding.

 

 

 

 

Love is the seed of communication, without which, nothing true or understanding can be communicated.

[Tao99]

Edited July 9, 2010 by Tao99

[Tao99]

Edited July 9, 2010 by Tao99

[Vanir Thunder Dojo Tan]

LOVING definitions.

 

 

Defining our words by context and not by arbitrary isolated written references.

 

 

 

 

Learning to communicate through as massive as internet and even as obscure as dance!

 

Let Love be the guiding force, not dictionaries and popular vote!

[buscon]

Very interesting topic, I'm thinking about what to write since some days

 

I quite agree with Trunk, even though there are some situations where sexual language is very interesting and colorful even in our culture.

Unfortunately, mainly because of Christianity, taboo or vulgarity has been the way to go. On the other side we have plenty of writers and poets that fullfilled this lack, here some good examples:

Bataille - Erotism: Death and Sensuality

James G. Ballard - Crash

Boccaccio - Decameron

De Sade - 120 days of Sodom

 

If someone is interested, I can give more links on the subject.

[gendao]

Hi Tao99, I didn't pay for anything. I'm not unhappy. If vortex wants to refer to women (or men) as 'pussy biotches,' that's his perogative. It rolls off my back and splashes onto whomever it sticks. There is much genuine pain, generalizations and name calling in some of these threads. If we're adhering to Taoist values some of the time and not others, aren't we straying from our path as effective cultivators?

For better or worse, hip-hop culture here has popularized using that term (and others like ho, nigga, skank, etc.) in a wide variety of contexts now. In my case, I was actually referring to men mostly & our entire population as a whole - in a playful manner..

While you two females were promoting pussy usage at me, look at what's bein thrown at/against you pussy (I mean it as a friendly slang term as you suggest)"biotches" on the other thread. http://www.thetaobums.com/index.php?/topic/14801-non-ejaculatory-orgasms/page__pid__197426__st__140entry197426 Oh well, I guess you get what you pay for. Good luck with that.

ok great. Then I will let vortex, non, and shadow tell you how f'd up you are and how you f'd up all the males. your right, who cares.

Lol awww, are we upset that pseudo-valiantly playing Captain Save-A-Ho has backfired against our wannabe knight-in-shining-armor here? That these grown women in 2010 simply aren't helpless, puritanical damsels in distress who need a chivalrous knight anymore? You're about 500 years too late, buddy!

 

The irony here is that YOU'RE the one who's sexist - because you stubbornly refuse to see women as strong beings capable of standing on their own 2 feet - WITHOUT your assistance. That notion is actually too threatening to you, because it essentially makes your services and usefulness to them as a supplicating beta male obsolete now.

 

You were never truly offended by the "vulgarity" of "pu55y" were you - you only pretended to be to gain the sympathies of women (pity fvck, anyone?)? So when that backfired, you got pissy and angry at them! Hilarious!

 

Seriously, who are you to tell women what they should be offended at and what is or isn't sexist to them?

 

I actually respect women because I don't underestimate them. Nor do I mythologize them onto pedestals like museum pieces. I simply try to see them as they are.

Edited July 2, 2010 by vortex

[Tao99]

Edited July 9, 2010 by Tao99

[Tao99]

Edited July 9, 2010 by Tao99