DarthBane Posted June 28, 2010 This topic came up in voice discussion with a few of us during the day. A few mentioned they like making bogus websites promoting certain economic and republican views. Â Now I a no politician but how does everyone feel about this if it were revealed that some of the bums were doing this? Do the normal bum feel good about dishonesty and much in general? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gendao Posted June 28, 2010 (edited) Bogus? What exactly is involved? Are you saying making a site that pretends to be Republican and then using it to subtly present a worse image of Republican than they really are? If that's what it is, I think that would be a waste of time, but it would also be a bad thing to do.Liberals tend to be masters at propaganda with Machiavellian ethics. Hence the media is predominantly liberal.A Beaverton, Ore., middle school teacher whose "Crash the Tea Party" Internet campaign drew national attention is back in the classroom after more than a week on paid leave. Jason Levin's website encouraged people to infiltrate the tea party movement to discredit the conservative activists. Full story here. Keep in mind, this shady liberal zealot is a middle school TEACHER. Now, you know why our kids think they way they do! Edited June 28, 2010 by vortex Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ya Mu Posted June 28, 2010 Everyone has been saying whatever they wanted ever since I invented the internet. But cellphones were probably my worst invention - even tops the net abuse. I mean, c'mon, who really needs to talk to someone else on the phone while shopping in Wall Mart. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goldisheavy Posted June 28, 2010 Liberals tend to be masters at propaganda with Machiavellian ethics. Hence the media is predominantly liberal. Â Right. Whatever you say. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goldisheavy Posted June 28, 2010 Everyone has been saying whatever they wanted ever since I invented the internet. But cellphones were probably my worst invention - even tops the net abuse. I mean, c'mon, who really needs to talk to someone else on the phone while shopping in Wall Mart. Â Ya Mu, get a hold of yourself please. Or if not, at least tell me what is your next invention down the pike, so I can get ready for it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeiChuan Posted June 29, 2010 Liberals tend to be masters at propaganda with Machiavellian ethics. Â Thats so laughable.. Liberalism, I LAUGH at your statement. Â Why don't you change fox news with a brain stem for 5 seconds and find out its not liberals/republicans its the mainstream media in general.. They work for there paychecks, and keeping politicians from scrutiny, NOT for the people. Â All Mainstream tv news stations in the US have had there times spoon feeding people propaganda. Â Its whether or not you realize that these minimal choices CNN/FOX news gives you, whether it be liberal or republican are skewed.. Â They confuse people with the wrong labels so you get on with the wrong issues.. Then when showed facts, babble about the party they think there represented by. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gendao Posted June 29, 2010 (edited) Thats so laughable.. Liberalism, I LAUGH at your statement. Why don't you change fox news with a brain stem for 5 seconds and find out its not liberals/republicans its the mainstream media in general.. They work for there paychecks, and keeping politicians from scrutiny, NOT for the people.  All Mainstream tv news stations in the US have had there times spoon feeding people propaganda. Oh I agree - FAUX NEWS is just as biased. The DIFFERENCE is that the neocons wear their biased party-affiliation on their sleeves. Whereas the liberal media doesn't. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E46LspYSvXs This same liberal MSNBC "journalist" "reporting"/reading straight off her White House memo defending Obama against Giuliani's accusations of him mishandling the BP oil spill: BTW, who is Mika Brzezinski? She just "happens" to be Zbigniew Brzezinski's daughter. Zbig just "happens" to be Obama's mentor and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller in 1973. And liberals think THESE are the good guys? Really???   So, I don't watch TV AT ALL anymore. I don't even OWN one now. I'm ALLERGIC to all that BS. It makes my eyes water and throat start gagging every time some trained teleprompter zombie starts reading prescripted CFR talking points like it's actual "news"...  Problem is the MAJORITY of American voters who do... Edited June 29, 2010 by vortex Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeiChuan Posted June 29, 2010 Oh I agree - FAUX NEWS is just as biased. Â The DIFFERENCE is that the neocons wear their biased party-affiliation on their sleeves. Whereas the liberal media doesn't. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E46LspYSvXs This same liberal MSNBC "journalist" "reporting"/reading straight off her White House memo defending Obama against Giuliani's accusations of him mishandling the BP oil spill: BTW, who is Mika Brzezinski? She just "happens" to be Zbigniew Brzezinski's daughter. Zbig just "happens" to be Obama's mentor and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller in 1973. And liberals think THESE are the good guys? Really??? Â Â So, I don't watch TV AT ALL anymore. I don't even OWN one now. I'm ALLERGIC to all that BS. It makes my eyes water and throat start gagging every time some trained teleprompter zombie starts reading prescripted CFR talking points like it's actual "news"... Â Problem is the MAJORITY of American voters who do... Â Im sorry for my assumption lol. But yeah I agree. Your right neocons wear it on there sleeves, but its not neocons this liberals that. If you label media in categories it will distract people from the point that theres something missing in general mainstream media. I know you know that, but when educating people thats an important piece to throw out. Â Again sorry for being so impulsive earlier, too much politics you know lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gendao Posted June 30, 2010 (edited) Im sorry for my assumption lol. But yeah I agree. Your right neocons wear it on there sleeves, but its not neocons this liberals that. If you label media in categories it will distract people from the point that theres something missing in general mainstream media. I know you know that, but when educating people thats an important piece to throw out. Again sorry for being so impulsive earlier, too much politics you know lol. NP, man! Both mainstream party members take their orders from the top (not their constituents below that they're supposed to be serving). Yet, somehow many people have been seduced by liberals to view them as the "good cops." Well, they're not good at all...and they're still pigs! For example, just to clarify what you're ultimately supporting when you vote for either mainstream party: "We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the light of publicity during those years. But now the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supra-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller, also ex-chairman of the CFR & Bilderberg member So, Mika & her pals are a mouthpiece for Obama & the White House...who are a mouthpiece for these world bankers...who are mouthpieces for...*paging David Icke*  It is important for me to point this out to people, because I see it happening YET AGAIN! Hook, line & sinker... People must realize that totalitarianism is traditionally always ushered in under leftism. Obviously, it'd be hard to gain a following promising totalitarianism! So, you market it as some form of Marxism which allows you to centralize all the power and vest people into the new system (so they can no longer fight it or get out). And once you've done that - you've now got full control and can do whatever you want!  This is how all the Communist despots took power. And don't forget, NAZI stood for National Socialist - which is exactly what Hitler did - nationalized & Socialized Germany. Edited June 30, 2010 by vortex Share this post Link to post Share on other sites