Aaron Posted July 29, 2012 Irony... I said at the beginning of this thread that chapter four was one of the few chapters where it really didn't matter so much how different the translation is, yet here we are nitpicking over something that seems to have little to no significance in the meaning of the chapter. I guess we might be a bit full... of it. LOL.... couldn't help myself. Aaron Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChiDragon Posted July 29, 2012 If one tried to correct the other who was insisting to call a deer a horse, was that nitpicking...??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stosh Posted July 30, 2012 Its inherent to the task that yall will be emotionally invested in it ... Take it from a fire-rooster or look to the wisdom of the ancients bend ,flex ,let it go... or grip into it rigidly Stosh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChiDragon Posted August 2, 2012 (edited) Its inherent to the task that yall will be emotionally invested in it ... Take it from a fire-rooster or look to the wisdom of the ancients bend ,flex ,let it go... or grip into it rigidly Stosh I've learned from a thousand year old university in my last trip to China: "One must dispute when the truth was being jeopardized." Edited August 2, 2012 by ChiDragon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted August 2, 2012 I've learned from a thousand year old university in my last trip to China: "One must dispute when the truth was being jeopardized." Hehehe. I would be pulling out my hair if I had any left. I agree with the quote but then who is to determine who is really speaking the truth and which truth is that person speaking? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChiDragon Posted August 2, 2012 (edited) Hehehe. I would be pulling out my hair if I had any left. I agree with the quote but then who is to determine who is really speaking the truth and which truth is that person speaking? It is the truth of the consensus which is the most reasonable and logical truth. Edited August 2, 2012 by ChiDragon Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brian Posted August 2, 2012 Hehehe. I would be pulling out my hair if I had any left. I agree with the quote but then who is to determine who is really speaking the truth and which truth is that person speaking? ^^^ I am. (Silly question.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ChiDragon Posted August 2, 2012 ^^^ I am. This was my original answer but I was not brave enough to say it..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stosh Posted August 2, 2012 This was my original answer but I was not brave enough to say it..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aaron Posted August 4, 2012 If one tried to correct the other who was insisting to call a deer a horse, was that nitpicking...??? If it didn't really matter, by definition, yes it would be. Aaron Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lienshan Posted August 4, 2012 who is really speaking the truth and which truth is that person speaking? Tao, emptied and made useful, has not to be filled. I read the truth of the above Mawangdui line 1 version this way: Try model a lump of clay into a cup; the form makes the clay useful, because the clay is made empty. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted August 4, 2012 Tao, emptied and made useful, has not to be filled. I read the truth of the above Mawangdui line 1 version this way: Try model a lump of clay into a cup; the form makes the clay useful, because the clay is made empty. And it is also the emptiness of the cup that makes it useful. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stosh Posted August 12, 2012 (edited) And it is also the emptiness of the cup that makes it useful. It depends on circumstance doesnt it? If I have an empty water glass its not doing me any good. I might as well throw it away. If I fill the glass, then the glass is useful for holding the water till I get around to drinking it. Stosh Edited August 12, 2012 by Stosh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted August 12, 2012 It depends on circumstance doesnt it? If I have an empty water glass its not doing me any good. I might as well throw it away. If I fill the glass, then the glass is useful for holding the water till I get around to drinking it. Stosh Well, that's a different way of looking at it. Hehehe. I wouldn't go too far with that thought though. Might get into trouble. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stosh Posted August 13, 2012 Trouble ? Im just saying the true and reasonable thing there. for the benefit of anybody who wants to hear it today Stosh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted August 13, 2012 Trouble ? Im just saying the true and reasonable thing there. for the benefit of anybody who wants to hear it today Stosh Truths? I've got enough of those. Tell me about some of your illusions and delusions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stosh Posted August 13, 2012 Ok Ill tell one if you will,, The ball is in your court. Stosh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted August 13, 2012 Ok Ill tell one if you will,, The ball is in your court. Stosh When I am at home the world is at peace. No wars, no conflicts, All life lives in peace and harmony with all other life. Another one - Our politicians speak only the truth and do only those things that are in the interest of peace amongst all living creatures. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stosh Posted August 13, 2012 1) I actually like bears , silly I know , and self defeating but hey , cmon they are nifty. 2) I have this illusion that the things we say and do live on after us and they affect all that will happen after. A sort of legacy of who we were that can never be undone, a fingerprint, a brand, some sort of ongoing ripple, and remnant of us. No matter how rapidly it appears to fade No matter how suddenly it appears to be swallowed up in background noise it will go on and on top of that ! I kid myself that my intent drives it to the positive. Stosh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted August 13, 2012 Your #2 is similar to my understanding/belief of "Universal Chi". No, I have no data to back up this belief of mine and I doubt I could present a logical explanation of this belief. (An illusion? Likely.) Hehehe. We managed to take this thread way off topic too. Chapter 4 really doesn't talk about illusions and delusions. But still, be careful of the bears. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stosh Posted August 13, 2012 You are correct sir Here is Aarons first post to bring things back on track... Here's chapter Four of the Tao Teh Ching for discussion. I personally think this is a great chapter and certainly helps us to begin to understand Lao Tzu's beliefs regarding the Tao. I look forward to hearing everyone's comments. Chapter Four (Translated by John C. H. Wu) The Tao is like an empty bowl, Which in being used can never be filled up. Fathomless, it seems to be the origin of all things. It blunts all sharp edges, It unties all tangles, It harmonizes all lights, It unites the world into one whole. Hidden in the deeps, Yet it seems to exist for ever. I do not know whose child it is; It seems to be the common ancestor of all, the father of things. Chapter Four (Translated by Gia-fu Feng and Jane English) The Tao is an empty vessel; it is used, but never filled. Oh, unfathomable source of ten thousand things! Blunt the sharpness, Untangle the knot, Soften the glare, Merge with dust. Oh, hidden deep but ever present! I do not know from whence it comes. It is the forefather of the gods. Chapter Four (Translated by Robert G. Henricks- Note this translations is from an older version of the Tao Teh Ching and may differ from other translations) 1. The Way is empty; 2. Yet when you use it, you never need fill it again. 3. Like an abyss! It seems to be the ancestor of the ten thousand things. 4. If files down sharp edges; 5. Unties the tangles; 6. Softens the glare; 7. And settles the dust. 8. Submerged! It seems perhaps to exist. 9. We don't know whose child it is; 10. It seems to have [even] preceded the Lord. Aaron Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer Posted August 15, 2012 Chapter Four (Translated by Gia-fu Feng and Jane English) The Tao is an empty vessel; it is used, but never filled. When one meditates and reaches a moment of being refreshed and invigorated and the self is cast off, even for a second, this phrase truly comes to life. I think you could compare the Tao to a vast, deep lake that we're all swimming in. The crazy part is that 99 percent of us get thirsty and desperately search for water, forgetting we are swimming in the very stuff that can replenish us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harmonious Emptiness Posted August 15, 2012 I'm thinking about it this way: "The empty vessel is used, but never used up." You have a cup, you fill it, it is still a cup. You overflow it, it is still a cup. It receives but it doesn't grasp. It lets go of the overflow and remains receptive, open, always ready to recieve, always ready to let go. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted August 16, 2012 I'm thinking about it this way: "The empty vessel is used, but never used up." You have a cup, you fill it, it is still a cup. You overflow it, it is still a cup. It receives but it doesn't grasp. It lets go of the overflow and remains receptive, open, always ready to recieve, always ready to let go. That's nice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites