Marblehead Posted January 4, 2013 Are the wise always happy I wonder? I don't know. Where is a wise man I can ask the question to? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Protector Posted January 4, 2013 I don't know. Where is a wise man I can ask the question to? Â I'm very busy actually, so many an appointment Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted January 4, 2013 To smile without knowing why one has smiled. Â To arrive without knowing how one got there. Â Yes, Sinfest, I will call for an appointment later. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GrandmasterP Posted January 4, 2013 I knew a wise man once, he was pretty chipper most of the time. Not always though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted January 4, 2013 Are we talking about external happiness or internal happiness? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted January 4, 2013 Can we consider a chirping bird in a cage happy? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Protector Posted January 4, 2013 Birds are small, they don't need much Them humans keep growing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
i am Posted January 4, 2013 It's an interesting debate, which ShenLung is getting after. Seeing the poor, brown people of other countries slaving away for barely-livable wages, making the throw-away products we use so thoughtlessly brings out gutteral reactions. Â But what was their life like before they had jobs? Maybe they lived in some money-free utopia, with fruit on the trees, clean water in the streams/wells, and everybody got along. Or maybe, shitty as it is, this job has actually improved their quality of life. Not up to a level of something we would call a quality life, but much better than where they were before. Â There's got to be a better way, both you and I would say. Yes. But...what is it? I'm sure there are plenty of ideas out there. But that soulless executive who doesn't care one bit about how hard life is for his factory workers, so long as they keep his manufacturing costs down, may have significantly improved the living conditions of many poor people. Â It's not a fact any of us like to admit to. Surely there's a way to raise the poor without putting them in dirty factories with no time off and only maybe just enough money to keep from starving. But maybe as of yet, this is the best option which has come along... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted January 4, 2013 Birds are small, they don't need much Them humans keep growing Good try but that didn't answer the question. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Protector Posted January 4, 2013 Then I will give you the best answer. The one so many people want to hear. Yes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted January 4, 2013 Then I will give you the best answer. The one so many people want to hear. Yes. Hehehe. Thank you for taking a stand. I would disagree though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Protector Posted January 4, 2013 Hehehe. Thank you for taking a stand. I would disagree though. Â I know, some people are so hardheaded that hair stops growing, or something Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted January 4, 2013 I know, some people are so hardheaded that hair stops growing, or something Hehehe. Good boy! Â Ah, taking an aggressive posture only indicates that you are unable to support the stand taken. Â We say the bird is happy in order to justify our act of imprisoning the bird. We never asked the bird if it would rather fly free. Â Just perhaps the bird's chirping is saying, "Let me out of this freakin' place so that I can fly and seek out my own food. That would give me great happiness." 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Protector Posted January 4, 2013 Hehehe. Good boy! Â Ah, taking an aggressive posture only indicates that you are unable to support the stand taken. Â We say the bird is happy in order to justify our act of imprisoning the bird. We never asked the bird if it would rather fly free. Â Just perhaps the bird's chirping is saying, "Let me out of this freakin' place so that I can fly and seek out my own food. That would give me great happiness." Â Then I should be unhappy as well. Â You see, when I look up at the sky and see how endless it is, I wish I could touch it but I wasn't born with wings to fly. I don't even have a limo that would take me where ever I want. My house is too small to house thousands of models that I don't have with me either. Â There are many more things I could gain to give me more happiness, but there are too many of them for me to own them all. Even worse, I could loose what I already have. If I loose my legs, I can only play basketball in a very sad way with my very sad team of sad legless players. Â No, I can't live like this. Take your marbles and live like that instead. Your happiness requires too much energy from me. I already have an endless source of happiness and the only one who can feel it is me. It is my own responsibility to be happy and I can do that myself. Being ripped apart chained down and put in a cage I can still have that and be happy. I don't need anything at all to be happy. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted January 4, 2013 I don't need anything at all to be happy. Indeed. That is the bottom line, isn't it? Our inner happiness. I would suggest that it is the very rare person who can say that they are always happy with their external conditions. But inner happiness? That is a lot easier to attain. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hydrogen Posted January 4, 2013  just as say the consumption of meat (other sentience / beings) steals the life + joy of another  but we are caught in this vicious cycle, this machine where people are $ and little else.  I am not advocating poverty etc... just awareness, to end exploitation of peoples / animals + the environment   "If you want to awaken all of humanity, then awaken all of yourself.  If you want to eliminate the suffering in the world, then eliminate all that is dark and negative in yourself.  Truly, the greatest gift you have to give is that of your own self-transformation."  A quote from Hua Hu Jing. Another good one is  "Those who wish to embody the Tao should embrace all things.  To embrace all things means first that one holds no anger or resistance toward any idea or thing, living or dead, formed or formless.  Acceptance is the very essence of the Tao."  Whenever I read something that disturbs my balance (not that hard though ), I'd question myself "are you willing to donate 10% of your income or time (2 hours a day) to fight this particular perceived injustice?" So far I realized that I just wish that God would take care of the problem, and I personally am just plainly too lazy and too selfish to care enough to put into action. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ShenLung Posted January 4, 2013 Sorry, WW, I was feeling a bit grouchy yesterday. Thinking about the vast amounts of resources that are available, proportional to the number of people is something that I've pondered for a bit, too. Living like kings and queens is a good description of what it might look like, but I have no idea of how to transform the world to that image without some very hardcore violence. Given that violence breeds more violence, that route cannot work, either. One possibility might be the development of a more enlightened capitalism, but this thought is still embryonic .. and no good means of delivering it as of yet. Â Those people who are wealthy, or want to be wealthy in material things have to do certain things to get their wealth, and to perpetrate it. The wealthy generally want to become more wealthy. In doing this, the thoughts are spent on their money, how to preserve it, how to increase it, how to spend it. Making the world a better place is not typically tied into the mindset of wealth creation, but it would be unfair to paint all of them with the same brush. Some really do think of the lives of their workers, their families, when planning to open a new factory. The profit margin might be less, but these are not the folks who set up sweat shops in poor countries, or pay farmers pennies for coffee that will be sold at ridiculous prices to the end consumer. Â I've flirted a bit with capitalism; it is hard work, many worries, and no guarantee of success. Living a simpler life is, well, simpler. Few needs, fewer wants, and much more inner peace works for me, and yet - All around me are the products that came into being due to someone who was seeking wealth. The electric lighting, air conditioning, computer, gas heat, refrigeration, car (old, battered, but running), even the chair that I'm sitting on came from the efforts of someone seeking wealth. If all of these things were gone tommorrow, and I were to live in the forest picking berries and cracking nuts, I would have no less happiness, and no less peace, but I think I would miss the luxuries, somewhat. Â Thinking about the generalions that came before this one, carving out their lives without these luxuries, no air conditioning, imagine, no AC! They had no experience of it, and did not feel that they were suffering from the lack of it. Would people be better off never experiencing the modern miracles, and so not feel the lack of such things? Now we have television, the dissatisfaction machine. It shows people a distorted picture of life, bringing about a contrast of all the things that they do not have ... the entire world cannot live like the characters displayed in television shows; not even the common person in the first world nations can match the image. Â I'm sorry, again, i've been droning on. At the end of it all, the personal discovery of happiness is something that one has to find within themselves; it seems that the only thing that can come from outside is discontent. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GrandmasterP Posted January 4, 2013 We did not have the electricity until 1958 and it was a real novelty when it arrived in our village. My grandad said... "Well it's alright, but it'll not catch on round here" He was wrong. What you've never had you don't miss. The big change came over a couple of years as people began to get TV sets, only two channels back then but once most folk had a TV people just did not socialise and neighbour as much. Pre-TV there'd always be one or two neighbours sitting in our kitchen having tea and chatting or we'd be round at a neighbours. That all went and life became more privatised somehow. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted January 4, 2013 Whenever I read something that disturbs my balance (not that hard though ), I'd question myself "are you willing to donate 10% of your income or time (2 hours a day) to fight this particular perceived injustice?" So far I realized that I just wish that God would take care of the problem, and I personally am just plainly too lazy and too selfish to care enough to put into action. Yeah, life gets a little more personal when we have to put our money where our mouth is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eye_of_the_storm Posted January 5, 2013 (edited) "If you want to awaken all of humanity, then awaken all of yourself.  If you want to eliminate the suffering in the world, then eliminate all that is dark and negative in yourself.  Truly, the greatest gift you have to give is that of your own self-transformation."  A quote from Hua Hu Jing. Another good one is  "Those who wish to embody the Tao should embrace all things.  To embrace all things means first that one holds no anger or resistance toward any idea or thing, living or dead, formed or formless.  Acceptance is the very essence of the Tao."  Whenever I read something that disturbs my balance (not that hard though ), I'd question myself "are you willing to donate 10% of your income or time (2 hours a day) to fight this particular perceived injustice?" So far I realized that I just wish that God would take care of the problem, and I personally am just plainly too lazy and too selfish to care enough to put into action.  I believe one can be without resistance and still move to change things... I think resistance refers to conflict within the mind which obstructs clarity / right action...  Mushin no shin /Zen / Samurai was developed... warrior mind... they still fought and died for whichever cause they believed in  Maybe we accept that life is a battlefield? and it is our duty to overcome ignorance / greed and other vices  just as spirituality self v self is the greatest battle ever waged  Transforming the self in to something finer /higher more noble / divine etc  One can get resist/ get caught in the web that is...all being discussed here... or one can accept the situation... not to be overcome with emotion and move in clarity to bring harmony.  Let us not make the mistake that non resistance and acceptance etc = doing nothing (have been there myself)  In terms of donating money/charities etc to make change... I don't believe so  that would only be addressing the symptoms and not the cause  While you are trying to build schools etc NATO/US will be carpet bombing  and so on  and as people are pursuing happiness... and not truth/ wisdom / justice / compassion etc nothing will change Edited January 5, 2013 by White Wolf Running On Air Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eye_of_the_storm Posted January 5, 2013 (edited) compassion doesn't = soft either  If someone has a heroin addiction the most compassionate thing someone could do may be to lock them in a room for however long until the addiction is broken.  "tough love"  Even violence could be considered compassionate depending on the situation etc ?? Edited January 5, 2013 by White Wolf Running On Air 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eye_of_the_storm Posted January 5, 2013 everyone is waiting on the Tao?? The Way / Universe for things to happen?  What if we are the Tao/Way/ Universe and we are all waiting on ourselves to do something about ourselves? haha  Similar to the God save us! ...well what if we are God? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted January 5, 2013 In terms of donating money/charities etc to make change... I don't believe so that would only be addressing the symptoms and not the cause  So you think that just because we cannot address the cause we should ignore the effects? No, I will continue to contribute to charitable organizations that help those who have been left behind by most parts of society. I can't change the world but I might be able to change one person's life. If we don't try then we are part of the cause.  While you are trying to build schools etc NATO/US will be carpet bombing and so on  But NATO/US will rebuild those schools that they bomb because they were being used to house military armaments that were killing innocent people. Not everything NATO/US does is bad. They have stopped genocide in many nations around the world. I'm not saying they are squeeky clean but they are not all dirty. There are a lot of the senior leaders truely wanting peace and for the factional killing to stop. And even more than that, we don't want their problem bleeding over into ours.  This is why Turkey requested and has recieved defense assistance from NATO/US. Turkey feared Syria's violence would bleed over into Turkey. And it is known that Syria has chemical weapons and the government will be using it against its own people as a last straw.  and as people are pursuing happiness... and not truth/ wisdom / justice / compassion etc nothing will change And I suggest that if you are not happy you will not pursue truth, wisdom, justice, compassion, etc. If you are not happy you will never find ways to help others because you will be stuck in your own little world trying to find happiness while you world crumbles down around you.  Only when a person is happy in knowing that they can make a difference will there be change. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted January 5, 2013 compassion doesn't = soft either I do agree with these last two posts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
eye_of_the_storm Posted January 5, 2013 (edited) Thanks for your response too Shenlung  Good stuff  I am thinking we need a.tactical response team haha  I think hacktivism will play a big role in the future/now also Edited January 5, 2013 by White Wolf Running On Air Share this post Link to post Share on other sites