Owledge

Ben Affleck: Ignorant fool or paid propaganda agent?

Recommended Posts

http://www.wideasleepinamerica.com/2013/02/oscar-prints-the-legend-argo.html

 

Based on this information, do you think he can be that shoddy in his research and not realize the gap between his self-image and reality? Or do you think he is being paid for that? If so, do you think he is fully aware of that or bullshitting himself?

 

Also, do you think a film director should face serious consequences after misrepresenting in that magnitude? (Although then I guess many politicians would have to face them, too.)

 

Will we eventually see Ben Affleck working in the White House?

Edited by Owledge
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The krytrons shipped by Smyth were sent to an Israeli company called Heli-Trading Ltd. owned by notable Israeli movie producer Arnon Milchan. Before his prominent Hollywood career, Mr, Milchan had served for decades as a Lekem agent, under the direct command of Lekem spy-master Benjamin Blumberg. It later became clear that the company MILCO served as a Lekem front company for obtaining sensitive equipment, technologies and materials for Israeli secret defense-related programs, and in particular its nuclear program.

As Hollywood and the White House eagerly embrace “Argo” and its propagandist message, they shamelessly and deliberately conceals a crucial aspect of this “historical” event. The glitter buries the all too important fact that the Iranian students who took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran , proceeded to reveal Israel ’s dark secret to the world. Documents classified as “SECRET” revealed LAKAM’s activities. Initiated in 1960, LAKAM was an Israeli network assigned to economic espionage in the U.S. assigned to “the collection of scientific intelligence in the U.S. for Israel ’s defense industry”

Yet, Iran is the "bad guy" now for developing nuclear power nearly 50 years later?? :lol:

 

Or perhaps more importantly:

By 1975 all of the members of OPEC agreed to sell their oil only in US dollars. Every oil-importing nation in the world started saving their surplus in US dollars so as to be able to buy oil; with such high demand for dollars the currency strengthened. On top of that, many oil-exporting nations like Saudi Arabia spent their US dollar surpluses on Treasury securities, providing a new, deep pool of lenders to support US government spending.

 

The "petrodollar" system was a brilliant political and economic move. It forced the world's oil money to flow through the US Federal Reserve, creating ever-growing international demand for both US dollars and US debt, while essentially letting the US pretty much own the world's oil for free, since oil's value is denominated in a currency that America controls and prints. The petrodollar system spread beyond oil: the majority of international trade is done in US dollars. That means that from Russia to China, Brazil to South Korea, every country aims to maximize the US-dollar surplus garnered from its export trade to buy oil.

 

The US has reaped many rewards. As oil usage increased in the 1980s, demand for the US dollar rose with it, lifting the US economy to new heights. But even without economic success at home the US dollar would have soared, because the petrodollar system created consistent international demand for US dollars, which in turn gained in value.

 

There is another downside, a potential threat now lurking in the shadows. The value of the US dollar is determined in large part by the fact that oil is sold in US dollars. If that trade shifts to a different currency, countries around the world won't need all their US money. The resulting sell-off of US dollars would weaken the currency dramatically.

 

So here's an interesting thought experiment. Everybody says the US goes to war to protect its oil supplies, but doesn't it really go to war to ensure the continuation of the petrodollar system?

 

The Iraq war provides a good example. Until November 2000, no OPEC country had dared to violate the US dollar-pricing rule, and while the US dollar remained the strongest currency in the world there was also little reason to challenge the system. But in late 2000, France and a few other EU members convinced Saddam Hussein to defy the petrodollar process and sell Iraq's oil for food in euros, not dollars. In the time between then and the March 2003 American invasion of Iraq, several other nations hinted at their interest in non-US dollar oil trading, including Russia, Iran, Indonesia, and even Venezuela. In April 2002, Iranian OPEC representative Javad Yarjani was invited to Spain by the EU to deliver a detailed analysis of how OPEC might at some point sell its oil to the EU for euros, not dollars.

 

There are many other historic examples of the US stepping in to halt a movement away from the petrodollar system, often in covert ways. In February 2011 Dominique Strauss-Kahn, managing director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), called for a new world currency to challenge the dominance of the US dollar. Three months later a maid at the Sofitel New York Hotel alleged that Strauss-Kahn sexually assaulted her. Strauss-Kahn was forced out of his role at the IMF within weeks; he has since been cleared of any wrongdoing.

 

This movement, founded in Iraq, was starting to threaten the dominance of the US dollar as the global reserve currency and petro currency. In March 2003, the US invaded Iraq

wtagqp.jpg

The sad irony here may be that Iran may actually be part of a tiny resistance movement working to liberate the world from dynastic banking families who are trying to takeover the planet with their NW0. And so predictably, they are branded as "public enemy #1" - while the world's sheeple cheer for their captors and for the death of their "actual liberators?" :lol:

Edited by vortex
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a slight correction sorry...

By 1975 all of the members of OPEC agreed to sell their oil only in shekels. :D

Great-Seal-of-the-United-States-bronze-e

Edited by White Wolf Running On Air

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your fate has been sealed. :D

 

 

 

 

 

Now In theaters:

 

Sealgourney Weaver

AND

Steven Sealgal

ARE

THE SEAL CLUBBERS

Edited by Owledge
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another anti-Wikileaks/Iran Hollywood DreamWorks propaganda hit piece is already set for release in Nov (

).

The activist says Bill Condon's "The Fifth Estate" is a "massive propaganda attack" and is "fanning the flames" of war.

 

LONDON – WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has lashed out against Bill Condon's WikiLeaks movie The Fifth Estate, starring Benedict Cumberbatch, describing it as a "massive propaganda attack."

"It is a mass propaganda attack against WikiLeaks, the organization (and) the character of my staff," he said, adding that the movie – the opening scenes of which Assange described as taking place in Tehran and Cairo – also hyped Western fears over the Islamic Republic's disputed atomic energy program.

 

"It is not just an attack against us, it is an attack against Iran. It fans the flames of an attack against Iran," he said.

“There’s a symbiosis between the CIA and Hollywood” and revealed that former CIA director George Tenet is currently, “out in Hollywood, talking to studios.” Baer’s claims are given weight by the Sun Valley meetings, annual get-togethers in Idaho’s Sun Valley in which several hundred of the biggest names in American media –including every major Hollywood studio executive– convene to discuss collective media strategy for the coming year. Against the idyllic backdrop of expansive golf courses, pine forests and clear fishing lakes, deals are struck, contracts are signed, and the face of the American media is quietly altered.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites