Sign in to follow this  
eye_of_the_storm

A Jolie: Breasts + News

Recommended Posts

We were actually discussing this in class today. Most of the women were horrified.

 

Of course, most women in Austin are Christian,..a cancer which is really horrific for individuals and humanity.

 

Who really knows why Jolie did what she did? I was around a woman who died of breast cancer,...and although I haven't experienced this cancer myself,...from my observations, when the dis-ease takes over the bones, it is worse than the imaginings of hell. Jolie saw her mother go through that.

 

If I was in Jolie's shoes, I would not have had this elective surgery,...but instead, do regular checkups. Her surgery only lowered her risk by 85%,...whereas, if detected early, it has a 95% cure rate. As she is now, cancer could mutate in a lesser early detectable area, and increase her fatality potential.

 

"Soon we all will die; our hopes and fears will be irrelevant....on the luminous continuity of existence which has no origin and which has never died, we project all the images of life and death, terror and joy, demons and gods. These images become our complete reality, and we submit without thinking to their dance. In all the movements of this dance we project our greatest fears on death, and we make every effort to ignore it." Padmasambhava

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the toxins are there cancer will manifest anyway... removing body parts or not. The body must find a way to get rid of the toxic build up... and it will find the most effective way to do that. Cancer is really the bodies last resort in protecting itself... it stores toxic build up / a rubbish bin of sorts... hence why cutting is not a good move... just releases the toxins and they spread around the body further. If you keep feeding the body toxins the cancer grows. If you cut the toxic the cancer will decrease and the body will heal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My grandmother had breast cancer and it got into her bones and spine. The last month she did not sleep and was crying in agony 24/7. Eventually she elected to receive a very high dose of morphene for five days she shook constantly in an unconscious state obviously still in immense pain though unable to communicate it. I tried to talk her childern into taking her off it the last three days because I knew she wanted to see our faces once more and to say good by, but they thought an unconscious passing was more humane. A lot of this comes from god(doctor) knows best. The AMA and all it's affiliates real programing is about constant invalidation of a god given right to know our own bodies. These organization sole intention is to end natural human inuitive ability about body. Not all doctor, just indoctrinated doctors that unfortuanatly far out number the intuitive, compassionate and un-a-Dult-e-rated. Wow, how many enemies did I just make?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If the toxins are there cancer will manifest anyway... removing body parts or not. The body must find a way to get rid of the toxic build up... and it will find the most effective way to do that. Cancer is really the bodies last resort in protecting itself...

 

IMO that is an incorrect view of cancer. Cancer cells are those cells that strive towards individualism, separation, and the veiling of coherent light. Cancer cells are rogue cells, that leave or separate from the company of the Harmonic Balanced Interchange of healthy cells. Cancer cells are as "Tea Party" cells,...fully into themselves, not the harmony of the Whole.

 

Cancer is not the body's last resort in protecting itself,...cancer is let loose when the Whole ceases to protect itself. Cancer cells believe they are "individuals",...and join with other "individuals"...attacking the Whole, and everything the Whole stands for.

 

Jolie attempted to remove a potential breeding ground for "individuality" by having her breast glands removed,....instead of testing for early detection. Of course, early detection can be problematic,...for example, the cancer that is the Tea Party has already gone rogue,...but the majority do not yet know of the horrificness of this cancer,...similiar to the status of the Christian meme.

 

http://www.christianitymeme.org/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO that is an incorrect view of cancer. Cancer cells are those cells that strive towards individualism, separation, and the veiling of coherent light. Cancer cells are rogue cells, that leave or separate from the company of the Harmonic Balanced Interchange of healthy cells. Cancer cells are as "Tea Party" cells,...fully into themselves, not the harmony of the Whole.

 

Cancer is not the body's last resort in protecting itself,...cancer is let loose when the Whole ceases to protect itself. Cancer cells believe they are "individuals",...and join with other "individuals"...attacking the Whole, and everything the Whole stands for.

 

Jolie attempted to remove a potential breeding ground for "individuality" by having her breast glands removed,....instead of testing for early detection. Of course, early detection can be problematic,...for example, the cancer that is the Tea Party has already gone rogue,...but the majority do not yet know of the horrificness of this cancer,...similiar to the status of the Christian meme.

 

http://www.christianitymeme.org/

 

A malignant tumor is: to a Human Body; as a metropolis is: to the Earth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The real question is the billion or so males lusting after her breasts - did that give her cancer?

 

Emotional energy is the number one cause of blockages.

 

She probably has some seriously repressed anger in her heart.

 

People are talking about plastic surgery -- and so is she getting fake breasts removed? Obviously not if they got cancer. Or did the implants cause the cancer?

 

O.K. I read the article now. Dang that's twisted - just because she had a genetic risk she then got implants.

 

Seriously -- epigenetics is way more of a factor than genetics -- the emotions create the enzymes that turn the genes off and on.

 

Yeah so......

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The real question is the billion or so males lusting after her breasts - did that give her cancer?

 

Emotional energy is the number one cause of blockages.

 

She probably has some seriously repressed anger in her heart.

 

People are talking about plastic surgery -- and so is she getting fake breasts removed? Obviously not if they got cancer. Or did the implants cause the cancer?

 

O.K. I read the article now. Dang that's twisted - just because she had a genetic risk she then got implants.

 

Seriously -- epigenetics is way more of a factor than genetics -- the emotions create the enzymes that turn the genes off and on.

 

Yeah so......

She hasn't had cancer it is a preventative measure because she has a gene which makes it likely that she will develop cancer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She hasn't had cancer it is a preventative measure because she has a gene which makes it likely that she will develop cancer.

 

  1. EPIGENETICS for Breast Cancer Prevention - Life Extension
    www.lef.org/magazine/.../nov2012_Epigenetics_Breast_Cancer_01.htm‎
    by A Johnson - Related articles
    Every year, nearly 250,000 women learn that they have invasive breast cancer. Roughly 58,000 more will be diagnosed with early cases of the disease.1 And ...
  2. Epigenetics as a therapeutic target in breast cancer.
    www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22836913‎
    by R Connolly - 2012 - Cited by 3 - Related articles
    1. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2012 Dec;17(3-4):191-204. doi: 10.1007/s10911-012-9263-3. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
  3. [PPT] Epigenetics and Breast Cancer - Research - University of Louisville
    research.louisville.edu/hsc/.../Epigenetics%20and%20Breast%20Cancer.p...‎
    Epigenetics and Breast Cancer. Dr. Diego Montoya-Durango. University of Louisville School of Medicine and Center for Genetics and Molecular Medicine ...
  4. Epigenetics and Breast Cancers - Hindawi Publishing Corporation
    www.hindawi.com/journals/ogi/2012/602720/‎
    by AT Vo - 2012 - Cited by 8 - Related articles
    Jan 9, 2012 – However, epigenetic mechanisms are now becoming recognized as significant factors in the development of breast cancers. Epigenetic ...
  5. Epigenetic difference in twins explains different risk of breast cancer
    www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/10/121017102947.htm‎
    Oct 17, 2012 – Researchers have identified an epigenetic change in a twin who will develop breast cancer but not in her healthy sister.
  6. Epigenetic study reveals new insights into breast cancer
    www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110505083224.htm‎
    May 9, 2011 – The most comprehensive analysis yet of the epigenetic modifications present in breast cancer has revealed potentially important new ways to ...
  7. Epigenetics in breast cancer - what's new? - Breast Cancer Research
    breast-cancer-research.com/content/13/6/225‎
    by Y Huang - 2011 - Cited by 34 - Related articles
    Nov 1, 2011 – Epigenetic changes are critical for development and progression of cancers, including breast cancer. Significant progress has been made in ...
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At the breast cancer walks they have booth set up for free exams and booths next to those with plastic surgeons offering sharp discount. Prior to a walk there's a media drive to get a record number of people involved. Two women in my familly opted for enhancment, not because the doctor had told them they were at risk. I wonder the revenue generated from all the exams? If a prominent figure like Jolie goes that route and medial sets it into everyones subconscious 50 times how much easier will it be for all the walkers to follow in her foot steps? The title of the events are Avon Walk for Breast Cancer, not walk for a cure, just for..

Curious, does walking several miles prior to a breast exam affect internal pressure of lymph nodes or other glands? ::edit: so they actually walk either 27 or 4O miles. Seems excessive? I really wonder how a breast exam may be affected by strenuous exercise? ...40 miles is about 10-13 hour long walk.

Edited by blindeye
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was like "meh" with this whole story. Just didn't surprise me in the slightest...I mean, it's Jolie after all. Lol

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a subtle public ad campaign to legally pave the way for GM0 HUMANS - to eventually mainstream human mutation, c!oning and a!ien hybridization (see Du!ce).

page2.jpg

Q -- Female abductees report being inseminated by aliens. Are they trying to hybridize our species?

A -- Yes, they are breeding slave-warriors for the upcoming war with the alien races (the Nordic races? - Branton). The serpentine races are in orbit around Earth, Venus and Mars.

s11sn.jpg

 

EXPOSED: Angelina Jolie part of a clever corporate scheme to protect billions in BRCA gene patents, influence Supreme Court decision (opinion)

 

Angelina Jolie's announcement of undergoing a double mastectomy (surgically removing both breasts) even though she had no breast cancer is not the innocent, spontaneous, "heroic choice" that has been portrayed in the mainstream media. Natural News has learned it all coincides with a well-timed for-profit corporate P.R. campaign that has been planned for months and just happens to coincide with the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent.

 

Angelina Jolie's highly polished and obviously corporate-written op-ed piece at the New York Times, the carefully-crafted talking points invoking "choice" as a politically-charged keyword, and the obvious coaching of even her husband Brad Pitt who carefully describes the entire experience using words like "stronger" and "pride" and "family."

 

But the smoking gun is the fact that Angelina Jolie's seemingly spontaneous announcement magically appeared on the cover of People Magazine this week -- a magazine that is usually finalized for publication three weeks before it appears on newsstands. That cover, not surprisingly, uses the same language found in the NYT op-ed piece: "HER BRAVE CHOICE" and "This was the right thing to do." The flowery, pro-choice language is not a coincidence.

Myriad Genetics sees stock price skyrocket thanks to Jolie, and Obamacare will funnel billions their way

Obamacare mandates taxpayers pay for BRCA gene testing: yet another government handout to wealthy corporations
The ACLU and the Public Patent Foundation filed a lawsuit in 2009, challenging the corporate ownership of human genes. Anyone who believes in women's rights, human rights, civil rights or even the right to eat non-GMO foods should immediately agree that corporations should NOT be able to patent human genes and then use those patents to rake in billions of dollars in profits while stifling scientific research into those genes.
Patenting human genes is huge business Today, about 20 percent of your genes are already patented by corporations and universities. As the ACLU explains, "A gene patent holder has the right to prevent anyone from studying, testing or even looking at a gene. As a result, scientific research and genetic testing has been delayed, limited or even shut down due to concerns about gene patents."
When in fact, all of our taxpayer dollars could be spent on actual cancer cure research, instead:

Scientists discover virus that kills all grades of breast cancer ‘within seven days’

 

Scientists at the Penn State College of Medicine said this week they have discovered a virus that is capable of killing all grades of breast cancer “within seven days” of first introduction in a laboratory setting.

 

The virus, known as adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV2), is naturally occurring and carried by up to 80 percent of humans, but it does not cause any disease.

 

Researchers learned of its cancer-killing properties in 2005, after Penn State scientists observed it killing cervical cancer cells. They also found that women who carried the AAV2 virus and human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes cervical cancer, had a lower propensity to develop cervical cancer.

 

When combined in a lab recently, AAV2 eradicated all the breast cancer cells “within seven days,” according to researchers. Better still, it proved capable of wiping out cancer cells at multiple stages, negating the need for differing treatments used today.

Or why couldn't Angelina just start ingesting cannabis oil, like Tommy Chong?

Tommy Chong, the veteran star of the dope-fuelled Cheech and Chong films, says he has beaten prostate cancer with a combination of cannabis use and a special diet.

 

Chong, 74, was diagnosed with cancer in June last year following a three-year period in which he said he had been drug free. He now says he is 99% free of the disease after a Canadian doctor helped him change his diet to include a variety of special supplements, as well as hemp oil. He then sat for a number of sessions with a practitioner named Adam Dreamhealer, described as a "world-renowned healer".

And why didn't Tommy Chong's story garner the same amount of fanfare and sympathetic praise for his courageous actions?

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

When in fact, all of our taxpayer dollars could be spent on actual cancer cure research, instead:

Or why couldn't Angelina just start ingesting cannabis oil, like Tommy Chong?

And why didn't Tommy Chong's story garner the same amount of fanfare and sympathetic praise for his courageous actions

 

Wow Adam the Dreamhealer has been confirmed by Effie P. Chow qigong master as the real deal - fully opened third eye long distance healing!!

 

I follow his tweets.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this