Racist Statements By "German" Politicians

[eye_of_the_storm]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZG_txfhrQs

You can see this agenda being played out in all European nations.

Edited May 21, 2013 by White Wolf Running On Air

[voidisyinyang]

Yeah it's kind of like Burma also means the Burmese.

 

Germany should change the name of the country --

 

Then those statements would not be "racist." haha.

 

German is not a race.

 

My sister taught in Bonn University for two years.

 

I still was always leery of Germans - sorry -- but even though my background is German and my name is German, etc. haha

 

I like the U.S. precisely because it is very diverse.

 

Of course the U.S. is not a "melting pot" and it is also based on racism but at least it is still diverse.

 

There are eighty different languages spoken in the Twin Cities Minnesota school system where my sister teaches.

 

haha.

 

So the same even for Sweden - my dad bought me a ticket to Sweden without asking me first and I refused to go.

 

Why? Because Sweden had slave ships and Sweden sold weapons to the Nazis while Sweden claimed to be neutral and Sweden is obsessed about race purity, etc.

 

Yeah my grandparents spoke Swedish and they came from Sweden but only after a couple generations after moving from Germany.

 

So Swedens are pretty much like Germans also.

 

But I was raised in the U.S. so in the inner city so was surrounded my people of diverse backgrounds all the time.

 

Unity in diversity.

 

We are all Africans!!

 

Yes I know that the Germans committed genocide when the came to Minnesota - I document this in my book.

 

It's very similar to what the Germans did when they colonized Africa, etc.

[eye_of_the_storm]

How can you claim there to no be race... and then call genocide in Minnesota?

Genocide is "the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group"

So these politicians are working for the genocide of the German (an ethnic, racial/national group) people...

They are using immigration as a weapon of mass destruction to ethnically cleanse the German people...

This same agenda is happening to numerous European countries... + also Pacific nations... such as the Fijian + Balinese people ... also Tibet

Edited May 21, 2013 by White Wolf Running On Air

[Jetsun]

Many of those statements don't seem particularly racist to me. The issue in Germany is that because of the disgrace of the Second World War afterwards they became too liberal with things like immigration, the result of which they allowed in millions of Turks and Muslims into their country very quickly which causes all sorts of social changes and social problems which are coming to the fore now, to talk and comment on such issues is not necessarily racist, it is infact the fear of coming across as racist which cripples many politicians in Europe from having reasonable debates about important issues like immigration

 

Here in the UK the politicians are terrified of even hinting at saying anything that could be interpreted as being racist and as a result there is no reasonable debate or policy implimented to tackle the issues concerned with it.

[eye_of_the_storm]

True Jetsun... I was looking at stats about London a week or so ago.. Brits are now the minority in their own capital @_@

Well a couple of quotes they are supporting the ethnic cleansing of the German ppl through immigration...

kind of like the "Palestinian people don't exist type of thing..." you can't genocide a people that don't exist right?

When are you going to convert to Islam?

Won't be much choice soon...

Nice art + music and sense of brotherhood/ unity

... sad to see Europe go though.

40'000 years of cultural development swept away in a few decades...


Edited May 21, 2013 by White Wolf Running On Air

[Jetsun]

True Jetsun... I was looking at stats about London a week or so ago.. Brits are now the minority in their own capital @_@

 

Well a couple of quotes they are supporting the ethnic cleansing of the German ppl through immigration...

 

kind of like the "Palestinian people don't exist type of thing..." you can't genocide a people that don't exist right?

 

When are you going to convert to Islam?

 

Won't be much choice soon...

 

 

 

 

 

The previous government here in the UK of Tony Blair basically just let in whoever wanted to come no matter what their skills or intentions towards the country was. I think if you asked the US security what one of their biggest outside threats were they would probably say that a radicalised Brit is one of their main concerns as there are so many Pakistanis and Somalians who live here who could get trained up in their home country then travel to the US and get in on a British passport, like that shoe bomber guy Richard Reid had a British passport on his way to the USA. The good thing I suppose though is that if they are in this country we can keep and eye on them better and foil their plots.

 

But I think the problem may be a bit overblown in the UK, especially when you compare it to many European countries like France, significant cities like Marsailles is currently 40% Muslim so will soon be the first European Muslim dominated city, you may ask what is the problem with this is but for example it is a fact that many Muslims prefer to deal with a lot of their own problems through community set up Muslim Sharia Courts rather than phone the official French police and those home made courts still hold barbaric attitudes towards important things like womans rights, and there is no need to integrate into the country and learn the language if you live in your own segregated city or area so the country as a whole becomes fragmented and weak , so it is a regression from the European enlightenment if such things are on the rise.

 

So it is true that the right wing is on the rise in Europe, with the Fascist Le Pen getting more power in France and other right wing parties gaining popularity, but it is also true that right wing parties always gain popularity in a recession so when the world economy recovers they will lose a bit.

 

yeah it's true that the white English are a minority group now in London, but the situation is a bit different because there are so many different nationalities and groups here it is a real melting pot of people from all over the world so it sort of works without any great deal of tension, whereas if you get just two groups like in some other countries it can create an us vs them mentality.

Edited May 21, 2013 by Jetsun

[Apech]

True Jetsun... I was looking at stats about London a week or so ago.. Brits are now the minority in their own capital @_@

 

Well a couple of quotes they are supporting the ethnic cleansing of the German ppl through immigration...

 

kind of like the "Palestinian people don't exist type of thing..." you can't genocide a people that don't exist right?

 

When are you going to convert to Islam?

 

Won't be much choice soon...

 

 

Nice art + music and sense of brotherhood/ unity

 

... sad to see Europe go though.

 

40'000 years of cultural development swept away in a few decades...

 

 

 

 

This is what ethnic cleansing means:

 

 

Ethnic cleansing (compare Serbo-Croatian etničko čišćenje^[1]) is the process or policy of eliminating unwanted ethnic or religious groups by deportation, forcible displacement, mass murder, or by threats of such acts, with the intent of creating a territory inhabited by people of a homogeneous or pure ethnicity, religion, culture, and history.

 

... what is happening in Europe is an increase in the diversity of the populations of countries like UK and Germany. This has happened as a result of colonial history and international trade in the 19/20th Centuries. The migration is mostly economic migration of people willing to move to work in rich countries for low wages and then settling there. There are social problems as a result due to pressure on local services, health care and education because governments have allowed this to happen in the haphazard and unplanned way.

 

Using the term ethnic cleansing for this process is incorrect.

[Apech]

The previous government here in the UK of Tony Blair basically just let in whoever wanted to come no matter what their skills or intentions towards the country was. I think if you asked the US security what one of their biggest outside threats were they would probably say that a radicalised Brit is one of their main concerns as there are so many Pakistanis and Somalians who live here who could get trained up in their home country then travel to the US and get in on a British passport, like that shoe bomber guy Richard Reid had a British passport on his way to the USA. The good thing I suppose though is that if they are in this country we can keep and eye on them better and foil their plots.

 

But I think the problem may be a bit overblown in the UK, especially when you compare it to many European countries like France, significant cities like Marsailles is currently 40% Muslim so will soon be the first European Muslim dominated city, you may ask what is the problem with this is but for example it is a fact that many Muslims prefer to deal with a lot of their own problems through community set up Muslim Sharia Courts rather than phone the official French police and those home made courts still hold barbaric attitudes towards important things like womans rights, and there is no need to integrate into the country and learn the language if you live in your own segregated city or area so the country as a whole becomes fragmented and weak , so it is a regression from the European enlightenment if such things are on the rise.

 

So it is true that the right wing is on the rise in Europe, with the Fascist Le Pen getting more power in France and other right wing parties gaining popularity, but it is also true that right wing parties always gain popularity in a recession so when the world economy recovers they will lose a bit.

 

yeah it's true that the white English are a minority group now in London, but the situation is a bit different because there are so many different nationalities and groups here is it a real melting pot of people from all over the world so it sort of works without any great deal of tension, whereas if you get just two groups like in some other countries it can create an us vs them mentality.

 

EU policy allows free movement within the European Union and this is coupled with links to Commonwealth. It was not particularly anything to do with Tony Blair as it was Thatcher and Major who signed up for these agreement and immigration has been going on for decades.

[Jetsun]

EU policy allows free movement within the European Union and this is coupled with links to Commonwealth. It was not particularly anything to do with Tony Blair as it was Thatcher and Major who signed up for these agreement and immigration has been going on for decades.

 

I work with a lot of people from places like Pakistan and under Labour they created a lot of intentional loop holes so anyone and their family could get in often using things like student visas, now those loop holes are being closed and about 80% of them have to go back now as their "student visas" are no longer valid.

[eye_of_the_storm]

Migration into Europe took somewhat longer to occur; the first definite evidence of human settlement on this continent has been discovered in southern Italy, and dates back 43-45,000 years.^[4] Settlement of Europe may have occurred as early as 45,000 years ago though, according to genetic research.^[5] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_islands_by_first_human_settlement

 

+ Recent events / history says otherwise ... you are quite the observant one... not all Muslim... who would have figured?

 

Do you forget the destruction of "heathens / pagans" with the rise of Christianity (middle eastern faith)? Join or die?

 

Among the first people to suffer at the hands of the kabbalists / Vatican.

 

Maybe you should watch this... they say it themselves...

 

 

I think this is what they call... a warning

 

Before things get to out of hand ... beyond the point of no return.

 

 

 

 

Edited May 21, 2013 by White Wolf Running On Air

[voidisyinyang]

How can you claim there to no be race... and then call genocide in Minnesota?

 

Genocide is "the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group"

 

So these politicians are working for the genocide of the German (an ethnic, racial/national group) people...

 

They are using immigration as a weapon of mass destruction to ethnically cleanse the German people...

 

This same agenda is happening to numerous European countries... + also Pacific nations... such as the Fijian + Balinese people ... also Tibet

 

 

 

haha!!!

 

Genocide is what the U.S. is doing to Iraq and Afghanistan and what the U.S. did to Guatemala and El Salvador in the 1980s and genocide is what the U.S. did to Indochina in the 1970s.

 

Genocide in Minnesota meant there was a bounty -- a price - on the head of every Dakota Native Indian in Minnesota.

 

Genocide in Minnesota meant there was a concentration camp for the Dakota Native Indians where they were forced to stay through the sub-freezing temperatures -- hundreds dying to disease, starvation, etc. and then hundreds more dying after the Dakota were stuffed into railroad cars and then shipped to barren lands in the middle of nowhere.

 

Eating grass to survive. That's genocide.

 

So yeah the Germans flooded Minnesota to steal the Dakota land and then drove the Dakota out of Minnesota by using genocide - like the mass hanging in Mankato of 38 Dakota after the Dakota fought back to try to stop the starvation of their people.

 

So what happened is that in the 1850s there were basically no Germans in Minnesota and then by the 1860s Minnesota was flooded with Germans.

 

Starting in the 1850s southwestern Minnesota was being targeted by German colonists, with

creation of the German Land Association after initial prospecting in the heart of the soon to be

Dakota-U.S. War.

 

 

They wintered near a heavily wooded creek…in an apparently abandoned Dakota

Indian village. Difficulties ensued when the Indians returned to the site. If the

immigrants were trespassing on reservation lands they would have to move,

according to the treaties signed at Traverse de Sioux. Since the land had not yet

been surveyed, the reservation boundaries could not have been clear to either the

Dakota or the Germans…. 71

 

June D. Holmquist, They Chose Minnesota: A Survey Of The States Ethnic Groups (Minnesota

Historical Society Press, 2003), p. 163. My great-great grandparents were living in New Ulm as German

colonists – New Ulm was besieged and burned down by the Dakota Indians. The local town created a

barricade and then led an attack to drive the Dakota off long enough so that the town could then flee from

the Dakota. New Ulm Minnesota is still considered the town with the greatest German immigrant

population in the U.S.

 

“The treaties of 1851 had promised the Dakota lump sum payments in exchange for land, but eleven years later

the Dakota had still not received the funds....Most of the money was given directly to creditors contrary to treaty

terms and to federal law.” Carol Chomsky, “U.S.-Dakota War Trials”, Stanford Law Review, November 1990.

 

By the 1870s the area of southern Minnesota, where the Dakota-U.S. War of 1862 had taken

place, was now known as “German Minnesota” with southwestern Minnesota comprising a 40 %

to 60% German population and some areas north of St. Paul were 80% to 100% German.94 This

growth was mainly due to farmers but the parallel to German colonialism as a part of

imperialism needs to be made. For example in Namibia in the early 1900s there was a German

genocide against the indigenous populations – a campaign of concentration camps and

extermination relying on racial science.

 

The racist colonial culture was inspired by the popularity of biologist Ernest Haeckel's motto in

the 1860s of Germany: “Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny.” To quote biologist Stephen Jay

Gould: “Recapitulation was Haeckel's favorite argument … Haeckel and his colleagues also

invoked recapitulation to affirm the racial superiority of northern European whites, ... Herbert

Spencer wrote that ‘the intellectual traits of the uncivilized … are traits recurring in the children

of the civilized.' Carl Vogt said it more strongly in 1864: 'The grown up Negro partakes, as

regards his intellectual faculties, of the nature of the child…. ’”95 The leaders of this German

genocide in Africa later directly developed the Nazi party and trained its leaders to continue the

racial genocide policy, again as a direct means for imperial expansion for land and resources.96

And so we have the same racist inspired colonial power grab in Minnesota:

At least one historian has suggested that the settlers' response to the war may also

have been motivated by greed: Treating the Dakota as criminals allowed the

United States to summarily remove all the Dakota from the state, thereby opening

to settlement land that the Minnesotans had coveted for years.97

 

And this policy of U.S. genocidal expansion continues!

 

Despite the U.S. having hundreds (at some counts 1,000) military bases overseas, the corporate-state

propaganda system in the U.S. disregards the reality of U.S. imperialism. C.T. Sandars, America’s Overseas

Garrisons: The Leasehold Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).

 

Social evolution monism (all is one) from the orthogenetic force was the mass movement

in Germany that led to Nazism (The Scientific Origins of National Socialism by Professor Daniel

Gasman, 1971).

 

Social evolutionary monism - it is from Plato.

 

So what happened is that the Benedictine monks working for the 9th Century Carolingian Empire - they relied on NeoPlatonic "Natural Law" eugenics philosophy.

 

This Platonic philosophy was taken from the Muslims who had "preserved" Platonic philosophy.

 

And so it spread into Europe with the attack on Jews as "conversos" - not able to convert to Christianity due to the racial Platonic eugenics philosophy.

 

This philosophy is directly against Taoism because the eugenics is defined by giving a person a number -- 9/8 is the ratio that Plato used for each citizen that must be "compromised" for the good of the State - i.e. killed off if not useful.

 

So the number 9/8 was "compromised" by using logarithmic mathematics - geometric magnitude math that justifies exponential inequalities of wealth by using technology based on the same mathematics.

 

And that is the real secret of genocidal policies.

 

It is a standardized math that goes against Taoism which is based on complementary opposites - natural numbers with no use of geometic magnitude mathematics.

 

“Germany admits Namibia genocide,” BBC News, August 14, 2004 and Namibia: Genocide and the Second

Reich, BBC documentary, 2005.

 

“Drawing on recent studies of the links between empire, colonialism, and

genocide, Nazi Empire examines German history from 1871 to 1945 as an expression of the aspiration to imperialist

expansion and the simultaneous fear of destruction by rivals.

 

Acknowledging the important differences between the

Second Empire, the Weimar Republic, and the Third Reich, Shelley Baranowski nonetheless reveals a common

thread: the drama of German imperialist ambitions that embraced ethnic homogeneity over diversity, imperial

enlargement over stasis, and ‘living space’ as the route to the biological survival of the German Volk.” Shelley

Baranowski, Nazi Empire: German Colonialism and Imperialism from Bismarck to Hitler (Cambridge University

Press; 1 edition, September 27, 2010).

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL8E006CE5618C0876&v=iXgIhSjWGhE&feature=player_embedded

[eye_of_the_storm]

This is what ethnic cleansing means:

 

 

 

... what is happening in Europe is an increase in the diversity of the populations of countries like UK and Germany. This has happened as a result of colonial history and international trade in the 19/20th Centuries. The migration is mostly economic migration of people willing to move to work in rich countries for low wages and then settling there. There are social problems as a result due to pressure on local services, health care and education because governments have allowed this to happen in the haphazard and unplanned way.

 

Using the term ethnic cleansing for this process is incorrect.

 

Once you take into account influx + birthrates + aging population etc... + another 10-20 years...?

 

Look at how much things have changed in that same span of time?

 

How long do you think Europeans as a unique people will hold out?

 

 

 

 

[voidisyinyang]

 

Once you take into account influx + birthrates + aging population etc... + another 10-20 years...?

 

Look at how much things have changed in that same span of time?

 

How long do you think Europeans as a unique people will hold out?

 

 

 

 

 

Africans are more European than Europeans are!!!

 

We are all Africans.

 

There are no "unique" Europeans.

 

There's more European genes in the original human culture - the San Bushmen -- then there are European genes among the Europeans.

 

haha.

 

Your idea of "race" is being racist.

 

Dr Francis Collins discusses this in his book The Language of Life (NY: Harper, 2010).

 

"The DNA sequence of any two individuals is 99.6 percent identical, regardless of which parts of the world their ancestors come from. ... Only about 10 percent of those differences [between individuals] are useful in predicting which populations you belong to" [p 146]

 

 

Edited May 21, 2013 by pythagoreanfulllotus

[voidisyinyang]

Ham et al. claim that there is only 0.2% genetic difference between any two races, and that the same percentage of variance of genetic material can be found within any racial grouping; moreover, the amount of genetic difference that accounts for the racial differences (as opposed to the racially-indifferent variance that is already found within each race) is only 0.012% (p. 54). This latter number is derived from the former as follows:

 

These so-called “racial” characteristics that many think are major differences (skin color, eye shape, etc.) account for only 6 percent of this 0.2 percent variation, which amounts to a mere 0.012 percent difference genetically. (p. 54)

 

http://firstword.us/2009/09/ham-on-the-extent-of-genetic-differences-between-the-races/

 

 

First. The difference between any two people (same or different race, doesn’t matter) is about 0.2%

Of that 0.2%, approximately 6% of the differences are differences in people groups. (Ken Ham refuses to use the term race)

That means that between two people of different groups, only 6% of the difference in their genes applies to characteristics you call race.

OK, Mr. probability expert, that means that you are possibly, or even likely to be more closely related so someone of different color in the room than someone of your “race”.

At any rate, the difference that determine “race” are minor in comparison to all other differences in the genes.

Edited May 21, 2013 by pythagoreanfulllotus

[Apech]

I work with a lot of people from places like Pakistan and under Labour they created a lot of intentional loop holes so anyone and their family could get in often using things like student visas, now those loop holes are being closed and about 80% of them have to go back now as their "student visas" are no longer valid.

 

 

My Tai Chi teacher is from Taiwan ... she was in UK for many years teaching in schools and local halls ... her father died and she went home for his funeral ... then they wouldn't let her back in. I used to teach ESOL to asylum seekers ... the way they are treated is not humane ... there are layers of red tape and so on ... and then the police turn up at 6 am and force them to go to the airport ... even if they have kids. the whole thing is a mess.

[eye_of_the_storm]

haha!!!

 

Genocide is what the U.S. is doing to Iraq and Afghanistan and what the U.S. did to Guatemala and El Salvador in the 1980s and genocide is what the U.S. did to Indochina in the 1970s.

 

Genocide in Minnesota meant there was a bounty -- a price - on the head of every Dakota Native Indian in Minnesota.

 

Genocide in Minnesota meant there was a concentration camp for the Dakota Native Indians where they were forced to stay through the sub-freezing temperatures -- hundreds dying to disease, starvation, etc. and then hundreds more dying after the Dakota were stuffed into railroad cars and then shipped to barren lands in the middle of nowhere.

 

Eating grass to survive. That's genocide.

 

So yeah the Germans flooded Minnesota to steal the Dakota land and then drove the Dakota out of Minnesota by using genocide - like the mass hanging in Mankato of 38 Dakota after the Dakota fought back to try to stop the starvation of their people.

 

So what happened is that in the 1850s there were basically no Germans in Minnesota and then by the 1860s Minnesota was flooded with Germans.

 

Starting in the 1850s southwestern Minnesota was being targeted by German colonists, with

creation of the German Land Association after initial prospecting in the heart of the soon to be

Dakota-U.S. War.

 

 

 

June D. Holmquist, They Chose Minnesota: A Survey Of The States Ethnic Groups (Minnesota

Historical Society Press, 2003), p. 163. My great-great grandparents were living in New Ulm as German

colonists – New Ulm was besieged and burned down by the Dakota Indians. The local town created a

barricade and then led an attack to drive the Dakota off long enough so that the town could then flee from

the Dakota. New Ulm Minnesota is still considered the town with the greatest German immigrant

population in the U.S.

 

“The treaties of 1851 had promised the Dakota lump sum payments in exchange for land, but eleven years later

the Dakota had still not received the funds....Most of the money was given directly to creditors contrary to treaty

terms and to federal law.” Carol Chomsky, “U.S.-Dakota War Trials”, Stanford Law Review, November 1990.

 

By the 1870s the area of southern Minnesota, where the Dakota-U.S. War of 1862 had taken

place, was now known as “German Minnesota” with southwestern Minnesota comprising a 40 %

to 60% German population and some areas north of St. Paul were 80% to 100% German.94 This

growth was mainly due to farmers but the parallel to German colonialism as a part of

imperialism needs to be made. For example in Namibia in the early 1900s there was a German

genocide against the indigenous populations – a campaign of concentration camps and

extermination relying on racial science.

 

The racist colonial culture was inspired by the popularity of biologist Ernest Haeckel's motto in

the 1860s of Germany: “Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny.” To quote biologist Stephen Jay

Gould: “Recapitulation was Haeckel's favorite argument … Haeckel and his colleagues also

invoked recapitulation to affirm the racial superiority of northern European whites, ... Herbert

Spencer wrote that ‘the intellectual traits of the uncivilized … are traits recurring in the children

of the civilized.' Carl Vogt said it more strongly in 1864: 'The grown up Negro partakes, as

regards his intellectual faculties, of the nature of the child…. ’”95 The leaders of this German

genocide in Africa later directly developed the Nazi party and trained its leaders to continue the

racial genocide policy, again as a direct means for imperial expansion for land and resources.96

And so we have the same racist inspired colonial power grab in Minnesota:

At least one historian has suggested that the settlers' response to the war may also

have been motivated by greed: Treating the Dakota as criminals allowed the

United States to summarily remove all the Dakota from the state, thereby opening

to settlement land that the Minnesotans had coveted for years.97

 

And this policy of U.S. genocidal expansion continues!

 

Despite the U.S. having hundreds (at some counts 1,000) military bases overseas, the corporate-state

propaganda system in the U.S. disregards the reality of U.S. imperialism. C.T. Sandars, America’s Overseas

Garrisons: The Leasehold Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).

 

Social evolution monism (all is one) from the orthogenetic force was the mass movement

in Germany that led to Nazism (The Scientific Origins of National Socialism by Professor Daniel

Gasman, 1971).

 

Social evolutionary monism - it is from Plato.

 

So what happened is that the Benedictine monks working for the 9th Century Carolingian Empire - they relied on NeoPlatonic "Natural Law" eugenics philosophy.

 

This Platonic philosophy was taken from the Muslims who had "preserved" Platonic philosophy.

 

And so it spread into Europe with the attack on Jews as "conversos" - not able to convert to Christianity due to the racial Platonic eugenics philosophy.

 

This philosophy is directly against Taoism because the eugenics is defined by giving a person a number -- 9/8 is the ratio that Plato used for each citizen that must be "compromised" for the good of the State - i.e. killed off if not useful.

 

So the number 9/8 was "compromised" by using logarithmic mathematics - geometric magnitude math that justifies exponential inequalities of wealth by using technology based on the same mathematics.

 

And that is the real secret of genocidal policies.

 

It is a standardized math that goes against Taoism which is based on complementary opposites - natural numbers with no use of geometic magnitude mathematics.

 

“Germany admits Namibia genocide,” BBC News, August 14, 2004 and Namibia: Genocide and the Second

Reich, BBC documentary, 2005.

 

“Drawing on recent studies of the links between empire, colonialism, and

genocide, Nazi Empire examines German history from 1871 to 1945 as an expression of the aspiration to imperialist

expansion and the simultaneous fear of destruction by rivals.

 

Acknowledging the important differences between the

Second Empire, the Weimar Republic, and the Third Reich, Shelley Baranowski nonetheless reveals a common

thread: the drama of German imperialist ambitions that embraced ethnic homogeneity over diversity, imperial

enlargement over stasis, and ‘living space’ as the route to the biological survival of the German Volk.” Shelley

Baranowski, Nazi Empire: German Colonialism and Imperialism from Bismarck to Hitler (Cambridge University

Press; 1 edition, September 27, 2010).

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL8E006CE5618C0876&v=iXgIhSjWGhE&feature=player_embedded

 

 

So what you are saying is... the common European people deserve to die because of the actions of a government that they have 0 control over? and for things that happened 70-100+ years ago?

 

Should you be executed for the actions of your government?

 

 

Didn't millions around the world protest again the Iraq war etc?

 

 

On November 9, demonstrations were held against the war at the end of the first European Social Forum in Florence, Italy. According to the organizers, 1,000,000 people were in attendance. Local authorities put attendance at 500,000.^[21][22][23]

 

 

In San Francisco, between 150,000 and 200,000 people attended the demonstration. The San Francisco police had originally estimated the crowd size at 55,000, but admitted later that they had badly underestimated the number and changed their estimate to 150,000. The day started with a waterfront rally at 11 am, followed by a march down Market Street to the Civic Center.

 

 

On February 15, millions of people protested, in approximately 800 cities around the world. Listed by the 2004 Guinness Book of Records as the largest protest in human history, protests occurred among others in the United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Germany, Switzerland, Republic of Ireland, the United States, Canada, Australia, South Africa, Syria, India, Russia, South Korea, Japan, and even McMurdo Station in Antarctica. Perhaps the largest demonstration this day occurred in London, with up to one million protestors gathering in Hyde Park; speakers included the Reverend Jesse Jackson, London mayor Ken Livingstone, and Liberal Democrat leader Charles Kennedy.^[31][32] A large demonstration, also attended by perhaps around a million, took place in Barcelona.^[31]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protests_against_the_Iraq_War

 

DEMOCRACY RIGHT?

 

Who is at fault here... government/ corporations / banks... or common people? Check out the documentary "All Wars Are Bankers Wars"

 

+

 

Though I think you already have some idea...

 

I want to end the wars and the exploitation home and overseas

 

I am of Irish heritage millions of my people killed... hundreds of thousands enslaved.

 

http://www.irishholocaust.org/officialbritishintent

 

^ interesting read

 

I don't blame the British people.... they are just as much slaves as any / just a different kind of slavery.

 

 

 

 

Edited May 21, 2013 by White Wolf Running On Air

[Apech]

 

Once you take into account influx + birthrates + aging population etc... + another 10-20 years...?

 

Look at how much things have changed in that same span of time?

 

How long do you think Europeans as a unique people will hold out?

 

 

 

 

 

Europeans are not a unique people anyway. The New World is populated mostly by 'europeans'. Maybe you should all come back????

[eye_of_the_storm]

Ham et al. claim that there is only 0.2% genetic difference between any two races, and that the same percentage of variance of genetic material can be found within any racial grouping; moreover, the amount of genetic difference that accounts for the racial differences (as opposed to the racially-indifferent variance that is already found within each race) is only 0.012% (p. 54). This latter number is derived from the former as follows:

 

Bovines share 80 percent of their genes with humans

 

Are we all cows?

 

Look at how you treat cows!

 

They share 80% similar DNA... there are no humans! there are only animals...spe·cies·ism = Human intolerance or discrimination on the basis of species, especially as manifested by cruelty to or exploitation of animals.

 

Mice and men share about 97.5 per cent of their working DNA, just one per cent less than chimps and humans.

 

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2352-just-25-of-dna-turns-mice-into-men.html

 

 

 

 

Edited May 21, 2013 by White Wolf Running On Air

[voidisyinyang]

Among Templeton's conclusions: There is more genetic similarity between Europeans and sub-Saharan Africans and between Europeans and Melanesians, inhabitants of islands northeast of Australia, than there is between Africans and Melanesians. Yet, sub-Saharan Africans and Melanesians share dark skin, hair texture and cranial-facial features, traits commonly used to classify people into races. According to Templeton, this example shows that "racial traits" are grossly incompatible with overall genetic differences between human populations.

 

http://wupa.wustl.edu/record_archive/1998/10-15-98/articles/races.html

 

So you ask me if I think the common population of European descent should die because of the imperial wars of the corporate-state elite?

 

I think that in a so-called democracy people have the responsibility to protest and to not cooperate and if they do so then these policies of genocide will not be possible.

 

So for example my German ancestors - why did they leave the Palatine Germany? Because of bad land ownership -- people were starving - because the rich were trying to control the land.

 

So the Germans - my ancestors - went to Ireland.

 

What happened? The Germans were supported by the Queen of England to be "technical advisors" to the British colonial genocidal estates in Ireland.

 

So genocide is not about race but it is about a Platonic Western technological advancement that uses geometric logarithmic mathematics.

 

So human population expands biologically using geometric exponential mathematics.

 

But Western genocide from Plato is based taking biological geometric growth and converting it to technological geometric growth.

 

So the technological geometric growth then also destroys the ecological balance of diversity - real genetic diversity!!

 

Western genocide actually destroys ecological genetic diversity of races more than it does human genetic diversity.

 

But Western genocide does destroy other human cultures that had previously preserved ecological racial diversity.

Edited May 21, 2013 by pythagoreanfulllotus

[eye_of_the_storm]

Your telling me you can't tell the difference between these 4 people? You have no idea where these people originate... they all look exactly the same to you? .... no unique people HAHAHA



Go and tell the African they are not unique

Go and tell the Chinese they are not unique

I guess you see no difference between these things either?



If two are destroyed.. doesnt matter right? because they are exactly the same?





Do you wish to kill nature? to destroy diversity and unique expression given by the universe?

You think you know better than the universe?

Edited May 21, 2013 by White Wolf Running On Air

[eye_of_the_storm]

Creation is WONDERFUL! BEAUTIFUL! UNIQUE!!

And all should be celebrated! and allowed to flourish / survive and express their unique qualities...

Go and tell the butterfly it is not unique!

[voidisyinyang]

I can give you other examples.

 

So for example the Irish poor lived off potatoes, millk and greens but what really caused the famine in Ireland? It was because the British imposed "austerity" on the Irish, forcing the Irish to export their food to the British.

 

The same is happening in India today - - there is genocidal famine in India because the British imperial policies have continued in India to force the poor peasants to export their food to Europe!

 

And so --

 

basically there is a good book on Ecological Imperialism by Alfred Crosby.

 

But essentially this problem goes all the way back to plow-based farming out of the Near East -- and even early agriculture around 7,000 BCE -- using deforestation to "water proof" the houses.

 

So pastoralism is actually after agriculture - pastoralism is a reaction to the ecological destruction of Western agriculture creating desertification.

 

The best we can do with agriculture is to use humanure compost like the Berber village in Morocco that I visited - they supported themselves from humanure compost.

 

So Asia farmed for thousands of years using humanure compost.

 

But the West takes their crap and dumps it into clean water!!!

 

This is why Rome had to build aqueducts.

 

So then Rome had to expand across Europe because they crap in their water and so they have dirty water and also they don't have good fertilizer to grow food.

 

So Rome turned north Africa into desert.

 

And so Western land policy is actually the inability of Taoist philosophy of the body-mind applied to the land.

 

In Taoism you put the fire under the water to COMPOST the human emotions into energy.

 

So the land policy should compost the humanure and this purifies the water.

 

Instead the West tries to separate the humanure from the land and so dirties the water and then also increases the fire as desertification.

 

Because of this then genocide is necessary by the West and this genocide goes back a long ways.

 

Then the genocide spread to China under Maoism as WEsternization of China, just as the genocide happened in India from Westernization there.

[eye_of_the_storm]

Evidence of settlement is not the same as historical record. You know literally nothing at all about the changes that took place in societal or cultural structures earlier than six thousand years ago. You have no idea how many little cultures were born and destroyed during that span of time. You cannot speak in any meaningful way about that time period, especially regarding its cultural development into modern times.Neither recent events nor history support your argument. The YouTube video you posted really support what I said better than what you said. The problem is radical extremism. Even that video is not sourced on a single group of people who are speaking out against America or Europe. They had to source multiple individual extremists from different areas and ideologies to form their argument. Frankly, talk is cheap too. The Weather Underground performed a few bombings, but fell far short of their ideal of taking over the Government.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weather_Underground

 

It is all fear mongering. If the global population were paying attention to the behavior of extremists, as they launch chunks of that population into conflict with perfect strangers, and seeing them for what they are, rather than thinking there is some racial divide that demands they go to battle then the extremists would lose all of their strength. The type of material you post is no better than the people in the video you reference here. It's all an effort to get people worked up.

 

A call to arms? Who are you fighting? What nation is invading your home? Outside of isolated incidents performed by small groups of extremists, who is forcing the destruction of culture? Would you become isolationist and expel people from countries based on their faith, or genetic line? Would you send people to war over their religion?

 

Culture changes over time. It is natural that it should evolve, and as the planet becomes more populated there will be a certain degree of homogenization of cultures and "races". It is an almost unavoidable consequence of a more global society. There will always be pockets of population who are resistant to this or call for violent action, but that does not mean they are representative of the larger populations they claim to represent.

 

 

Hahah man... the first 12 second of the video was of a national tv program...

[voidisyinyang]

You're confusing skin color and facial features with cultural diversity!

 

The Westernization of Europe happened through the spread of Greek-Roman imperialism.

 

So that is why Europe is based on genocidal culture that is racist.

 

The Muslim culture "preserved" this genocidal culture through Platonic philosophy.

 

It spread back into Europe in the 9th Century from the Muslims.

 

The Western genocidal culture then spread to the New World in the 15th century.

 

Human cultural diversity had its downfall with monocultural farming that started around plow-based farming.

 

It got bad around 3000 BCE.

 

It started to get bad around 7,000 BCE.

 

But human culture goes back to 100,000 BCE.

 

The San Bushman original human culture is based on trance dance singing that is from 100,000 BCE.

 

The San Bushmen are the most genetically diverse culture of humans!!!

 

The San Bushmen are the origins of all other humans genetically.

 

The San Bushmen language is the most sophisticated with the most sounds used and also the most musical.

 

So the "racial" skin differences can actually all be traced back to the San Bushmen culture which then spread around the Earth.

 

Westernization then spread around the Earth as a genocidal culture killing off human diversity.

 

Let's consider Muslim culture and cultural genocide:

 

 

At the 2000 census, there were over 84 million speakers of Javanese, as reported by the Ethnologue.

Surely a language with so many speakers is secure? Unfortunately not.

 

In 2000 there were some 24 million speakers of Indonesian but this official language is coming to dominate, and in some large towns and cities children in primary school speak Indonesian rather than Javanese by choice, even in Javanese class. On current trends, Javanese will be lost in the cities, but may persist in rural villages.

 

But it is conceivable that within a few generations a language with tens of millions of speakers might cease to be spoken altogether, unless the situation is recognised, parents understand that their attitudes and speech behaviour make a difference, and serious language planning policy for endangered languages is developed by government.

 

http://theconversation.com/loss-of-languages-speaks-volumes-about-changing-times-657

 

So Muslim culture is part of this Westernization urbanization process that is genocidal.

 

What is happening in Germany is nothing about real diversity of land differences and ecology, etc.

 

 

We know of lost languages from ancient written records, Hittite, Etruscan, Basque’s relatives. Why is it so different now?

The scale of loss is unprecedented and is a natural consequence of a changing human world that in the last few milennia has been leaving behind its hunter gatherer past, and in the past few centuries has been increasingly leaving behind its rural agricultural settings for the metropolis.

[eye_of_the_storm]

Fear mongering aye?

Well I guess Israel should disarm and open its borders too, right?