RongzomFan

Debunking a Creator

Recommended Posts

  On 12/6/2013 at 4:10 AM, Simple_Jack said:

You didn't understand the point which I brought up because you are not a practitioner of buddhadharma.

 

If your system is based on belief and not on verifiable facts it is useless to me nad possibly to others

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 12/6/2013 at 4:10 AM, gatito said:

This whole discussion is therefore totally pointless because you have no factual basis for your system

 

Which should apply to Vedanta and the Abrahamic religions as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 12/6/2013 at 4:13 AM, Simple_Jack said:

Which should apply to Vedanta and the Abrahamic religions as well.

 

Incorrect

 

Vedanta is verifiable

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 12/6/2013 at 4:12 AM, gatito said:

If your system is based on belief and not on verifiable facts it is useless to me nad possibly to others

 

Which proves my point that you, ralis, etc. are reliant on double standards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 12/6/2013 at 4:16 AM, RongzomFan said:

You just dug yourself into a huge hole.

 

Bet you I didn't :)

 

  On 12/6/2013 at 4:16 AM, Simple_Jack said:

Double standard.

 

Single standard - verifiable by you in your lifetime - if you're serious

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 12/6/2013 at 4:18 AM, RongzomFan said:

Adi Shankara believed in Krishna and Vishnu.

 

Are Krishna and Vishnu verifiable?

 

I wasn't around when he was around so I cannot verify the truth of that statement

 

Not relevant

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 12/6/2013 at 4:19 AM, gatito said:

Single standard - verifiable by you in your lifetime - if you're serious

 

You are probably talking about recognizing the nature of the mind.

 

We have that too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 12/6/2013 at 4:19 AM, gatito said:

Single standard - verifiable by you in your lifetime - if you're serious

 

Funny you're only applying this to Vedanta which further proves my point that you, ralis, etc. are reliant on double standards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you serious abo

 

  On 12/6/2013 at 4:21 AM, RongzomFan said:

You are probably talking about recognizing the nature of the mind.

 

We have that too.

 

I'm talking about what I know about and what you can verify independently for yourselves if you're open enough to the possibility to actually investigate it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 12/6/2013 at 4:22 AM, gatito said:

Are you serious abo

 

 

I'm talking about what I know about and what you can verify independently for yourselves if you're open enough to the possibility to actually investigate it

 

Does anyone know what this guy is talking about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 12/6/2013 at 4:21 AM, Simple_Jack said:

Funny you're only applying this to Vedanta which further proves my point that you, ralis, etc. are reliant on double standards.

 

I reiterate that I can only discuss what I know about - no double standard - it's not reliant on any belief

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 12/6/2013 at 4:23 AM, RongzomFan said:

Does anyone know what this guy is talking about?

 

I know what I'm talking about :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 12/6/2013 at 4:23 AM, RongzomFan said:

Does anyone know what this guy is talking about?

 

A double standard because according to him this only applies to Vedanta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 12/6/2013 at 4:24 AM, gatito said:

I reiterate that I can only discuss what I know about - no double standard - it's not reliant on any belief

 

Are you going to tell us what you know??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.