Debunking a Creator

[gatito]

You didn't understand the point which I brought up because you are not a practitioner of buddhadharma.

 

If your system is based on belief and not on verifiable facts it is useless to me nad possibly to others

[gatito]

Only for the mystical aspects like transmission and terma.

 

http://thetaobums.com/topic/32153-mystical-buddhist-readings/

 

What do you mean by that?

[Simple_Jack]

This whole discussion is therefore totally pointless because you have no factual basis for your system

 

Which should apply to Vedanta and the Abrahamic religions as well.

[RongzomFan]

If your system is based on belief and not on verifiable facts it is useless to me nad possibly to others

 

I'm sorry you feel that way. Even South Asian scholars treat these subjects quite seriously:

 

http://www.thlib.org/collections/texts/jiats/#!jiats=/01/germano/b8/

[gatito]

LMAO

 

You can find this though - if you look properly

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmananda_Krishna_Menon

(://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmananda_Krishna_Menon)

[gatito]

Which should apply to Vedanta and the Abrahamic religions as well.

 

Incorrect

 

Vedanta is verifiable

[RongzomFan]

You can find this though - if you look properly

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmananda_Krishna_Menon

(://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmananda_Krishna_Menon)

 

I did a CTRL+F for Direct Path, and got shit

[Simple_Jack]

If your system is based on belief and not on verifiable facts it is useless to me nad possibly to others

 

Which proves my point that you, ralis, etc. are reliant on double standards.

[RongzomFan]

Incorrect

 

Vedanta is verifiable

 

Really?

 

Brahman is verifiable?

[RongzomFan]

Incorrect

 

Vedanta is verifiable

 

You just dug yourself into a huge hole.

[Simple_Jack]

Incorrect

 

Vedanta is verifiable

 

Double standard.

[RongzomFan]

Adi Shankara believed in Krishna and Vishnu.

 

Are Krishna and Vishnu verifiable?

[gatito]

You just dug yourself into a huge hole.

 

Bet you I didn't

 

Double standard.

 

Single standard - verifiable by you in your lifetime - if you're serious

[gatito]

Adi Shankara believed in Krishna and Vishnu.

 

Are Krishna and Vishnu verifiable?

 

I wasn't around when he was around so I cannot verify the truth of that statement

 

Not relevant

[RongzomFan]

Single standard - verifiable by you in your lifetime - if you're serious

 

You are probably talking about recognizing the nature of the mind.

 

We have that too.

[Simple_Jack]

Single standard - verifiable by you in your lifetime - if you're serious

 

Funny you're only applying this to Vedanta which further proves my point that you, ralis, etc. are reliant on double standards.

[gatito]

Are you serious abo

 

You are probably talking about recognizing the nature of the mind.

 

We have that too.

 

I'm talking about what I know about and what you can verify independently for yourselves if you're open enough to the possibility to actually investigate it

[RongzomFan]

I wasn't around when he was around so I cannot verify the truth of that statement

 

Not relevant

 

http://books.google.com/books?id=0z02cZe8PU8C&pg=PA313&dq=krishna+a+sourcebook+He+describes+Krishna+as+an+avatara+of+Vishnu/Narayana,+indeed&hl=en&sa=X&ei=JVGhUsCSOc_lsATU04DwAw&ved=0CDQQuwUwAA#v=onepage&q=krishna%20a%20sourcebook%20He%20describes%20Krishna%20as%20an%20avatara%20of%20Vishnu%2FNarayana%2C%20indeed&f=false

[RongzomFan]

Are you serious abo

 

 

I'm talking about what I know about and what you can verify independently for yourselves if you're open enough to the possibility to actually investigate it

 

Does anyone know what this guy is talking about?

[gatito]

Funny you're only applying this to Vedanta which further proves my point that you, ralis, etc. are reliant on double standards.

 

I reiterate that I can only discuss what I know about - no double standard - it's not reliant on any belief

[gatito]

Does anyone know what this guy is talking about?

 

I know what I'm talking about

[Simple_Jack]

Does anyone know what this guy is talking about?

 

A double standard because according to him this only applies to Vedanta.

[RongzomFan]

I reiterate that I can only discuss what I know about - no double standard - it's not reliant on any belief

 

Are you going to tell us what you know??

[Simple_Jack]

I reiterate that I can only discuss what I know about - no double standard - it's not reliant on any belief

 

Another double standard because I posted a summary on how to put the buddhadharma to practice, here http://thetaobums.com/topic/32739-yidams-in-vajrayana/?p=500344

[RongzomFan]

Are you going to tell us what you know??

 

 

bump for a response