Debunking a Creator

[zerostao]

Fine, but do you agree that these dualistic parameters are the starting point in determining how to still afflicted experience?

do you think that there is also non afflicted experience?

[gatito]

That must be the stupidest comment in the entire thread.

 

Not only did RongzomFan selectively misquote but he also ignored the reference to the two-line rebuttal (that I posted on the first page), which was beyond his grasp and then he resorted to abusising/trolling me - an observable pattern.

 

Then he moved on to trolling IB in particular and others in general.

 

These actions are signposts of someone who's very unhappy (and therefore ignorant of the meanings of Aham Bramah Asmi and Tat Tvam Asi).

[gatito]

Fine, but do you agree that these dualistic parameters are the starting point in determining how to still afflicted experience?

 

The can be a starting point.

 

They can also be a sticking point.

[RongzomFan]

God damn it Gatito

 

Are you going to tell us what you know??

bump for a response

Edited December 8, 2013 by RongzomFan

[zerostao]

bump for a response

me either

 

do you think that there is also non afflicted experience?

[gatito]

Often we hear people discussing spiritual truth from the objective standpoint, and resting content with theoretical knowledge. This is the result of pursuing dry and fruitless lines of thinking. An aspirant has nothing to gain from mere appreciatory or depreciatory discussion of the truths set forth in philosophical works. The idea of the Acharyas was only that each should follow some line of spiritual thought which would help him to attain realisation. This is clear from the words of Sri Sureshwaracharya already quoted. The present book is meant for those earnest aspirants who, not being satisfied with theoretical knowledge, want to pursue the path of realisation.

[gatito]

me either

 

do you think that there is also non afflicted experience?

 

Would it help you if I said "Yes"?

[RongzomFan]

Gatito, you don't have a fucking post on the first page.

[RongzomFan]

LMAO

[RongzomFan]

Gatito,

 

You are a weird guy. Seriously.

[zerostao]

@ gatito,

i was wanting simple jack to answer since i asked him yesterday. and he had been talking of how some here wouldnt answer his question.

now RF same thing.

and simplejack speaks of double standards?

[gatito]

Gatito, you don't have a fucking post on the first page.

 

I removed it

 

LMAO

 

Glad that you appreciate the joke

[RongzomFan]

LMAO,

 

So you keep referring to a post you removed????

 

And you also keep referring to 2 sentences within that post?????

Edited December 8, 2013 by RongzomFan

[gatito]

Gatito,

 

You are a weird guy. Seriously.

 

Thank you

(Seriously)

[gatito]

Bye (for now )

[RongzomFan]

http://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=4412&p=44426&hilit=beginnings#p44426

 

http://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=7094&p=84992&hilit=beginnings#p84992

 

http://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=7094&p=84992&hilit=beginnings#p84966

 

http://www.dharmawheel.net/viewtopic.php?f=77&t=3803&p=47229&hilit=beginnings#p47229

 

bump

[zerostao]

bump

do you think that there is also non afflicted experience?

[Simple_Jack]

do you think that there is also non afflicted experience?

 

Brian didn't want me to continue this until a definite and conclusive answer to this thread was resolved or that I start a new topic.

 

Not only did RongzomFan selectively misquote but he also ignored the reference to the two-line rebuttal (that I posted on the first page), which was beyond his grasp and then he resorted to abusising/trolling me - an observable pattern.

 

Then he moved on to trolling IB in particular and others in general.

 

These actions are signposts of someone who's very unhappy (and therefore ignorant of the meanings of Aham Bramah Asmi and Tat Tvam Asi).

 

Gatito, admit to your double standards:

 

http://thetaobums.com/topic/32820-debunking-a-creator/?p=502408

 

So you're reliant on faith!!!

 

I can't believe that

 

http://thetaobums.com/topic/32820-debunking-a-creator/?p=502461

 

Yes, so are believing the Vedas, the Torah, the Bible, the Koran are of divine origin.

The can be a starting point.

 

They can also be a sticking point.

 

Even Ramana Maharshi elaborated on savikalpa, nirvikalpa, nirvikalpa sahaja samadhi.

[RongzomFan]

I don't know how Ramana Maharishi became any sort of authority in any way.

 

I guess since Islam destroyed the tantric lineages, people resort to bullshit gurus like Ramana.

[RongzomFan]

bump

do you think that there is also non afflicted experience?

 

I go by rigpa (knowledge) vs marigpa (ignorance).

[Simple_Jack]

I don't know how Ramana Maharishi became any sort of authority in any way.

 

I guess since Islam destroyed the tantric lineages, people resort to bullshit gurus like Ramana.

 

Gatitio follows "Direct Path" Advaita and Ramana Maharshi was the starting point for this.

[RongzomFan]

Gatitio follows "Direct Path" Advaita and Ramana Maharshi was the starting point for this.

 

Yes, but why do people care about Ramana?

 

Is it the lack of genuine tantric lineages like in Buddhism?

[zerostao]

thanks for the responses simplejack and rongzomfan.

if someone will alert me when " a definite and conclusive answer to this thread was resolved"

does rigpa(knowledge) relate to rational thought?

if so, how?

[Simple_Jack]

Yes, but why do people care about Ramana?

 

Is it the lack of genuine tantric lineages like in Buddhism?

 

No thanks to the Islamic invasions of medieval India.

[RongzomFan]

No thanks to the Islamic invasions of medieval India.

 

Yes Islam destroyed parts of Hinduism:

 

http://books.google.com/books?id=GKBV7QZ7BBQC&pg=PA34&dq=tantric+body+As+Dyczkowski+observes,+the+consolidation+of+Muslim+rule+in+north+India&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Es-kUtqCCrLNsQTZh4LQBg&ved=0CDsQuwUwAA#v=onepage&q=tantric%20body%20As%20Dyczkowski%20observes%2C%20the%20consolidation%20of%20Muslim%20rule%20in%20north%20India&f=false

Edited December 8, 2013 by RongzomFan