RongzomFan

Debunking a Creator

Recommended Posts

The Kabbalists use the term Ein-sof which means totality which is unexplainable. Kabbalists such as Abraham Abulafia et al. Not New Age types.

 

I thought you were some kind of rationalist??

 

Now you are Jewish?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I see here are statements in regards to beings from divine realms commanding adherence to absolute rules for teaching/transmission. Can that be proven, or is the belief in such, blind faith? Can a rational discourse such as what Kabbalists insist on prove the existence of a divine realm that Kabbalists defer to without question? Are the so called divine realms pure myth?

 

These are reasonable questions.

 

You took the liberty to post what I said without giving me credit as if this is your own? Plagiarism! Here is the link to my post.

 

http://thetaobums.com/topic/32820-debunking-a-creator/page-19#entry502404

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought you were some kind of rationalist??

 

Now you are Jewish?

 

I see a hint of racism in your post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jews are considered Gods chosen children, please disprove this.

 

I believe in the teachings of John Levy. I am a Jew :wub:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are projecting your own.

 

I just want to stop any racial/bigotry that may occur in this thread. Perhaps I was overreacting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very interdisciplinary of you gatito.

holding to one branch of thought doesnt seem very useful from my pov.

it does seem rather limiting.

 

Un_d%C3%AEner_de_philosophes.Jean_Huber.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that makes sense, they were probably tired of spinning the wheels of absolutist fundamental ideology, when they could focus on immediate concerns such as understanding the nature of afflictions.

 

Don't tell me this is the first time you are noticing SJ.

 

A lot of Buddhist authors have obviously jewish names.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to stop any racial/bigotry that may occur in this thread. Perhaps I was overreacting.

i prefer this thread stay out of the pit. there have been calls to pit it. i have resisted that.

i am hopeful you bums can keep it up top.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to stop any racial/bigotry that may occur in this thread. Perhaps I was overreacting.

 

I go by cranial shape, not skin color or ethnicity.

 

The forehead of Homo genus becomes more bulgy from Homo erectus to Homo sapiens.

Edited by RongzomFan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't tell me this is the first time you are noticing SJ.

 

A lot of Buddhist authors have obviously jewish names.

 

I definitely figured this out in the Insight Meditation Society. :D

 

I go by cranial shape, not skin color or ethnicity.

 

The forehead of Homo genus becomes more bulgy from Homo erectus to Homo sapiens.

 

:lol:

Edited by Simple_Jack

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quest Regarding the Cause

of the World – Meaningless

 

No question can there be regarding the time,

place and cause of the origins of this world, for these

themselves form parts of the world.

 

The question seeks to have an explanation of the

whole in terms of its part. This can never be a

logical question.

 

<snip>

 

Beautifully elegant

 

For anyone wanting to follow this up; John Levy goes into a more detailed explanation in The Nature of Man According to the Vedanta

 

Yeah thats typical theism.

 

That God in unknowable.

 

Thats in any church dude.

Edited by RongzomFan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I go by cranial shape, not skin color or ethnicity.

 

The forehead of Homo genus becomes more bulgy from Homo erectus to Homo sapiens.

 

What does this have to do with the OP?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

very interdisciplinary of you gatito.

holding to one branch of thought doesnt seem very useful from my pov.

it does seem rather limiting.

 

What's limiting are the double standards he's posted in this thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I go by cranial shape, not skin color or ethnicity.

 

The forehead of Homo genus becomes more bulgy from Homo erectus to Homo sapiens.

 

Do you know what Phrenology is? In general that pseudoscience was used to classify race to determine superiority of a given race.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Do you know what Phrenology is? In general that pseudoscience was used to classify race to determine superiority of a given race.

Of course thats bullshit.

 

I'm going by the latest understanding of human evolution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which proves that you are biased and rely on double standards.

 

What are you talking about. You quoted me claiming it was your own. Stop the incessant badgering about double standards. You plagiarized my post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.