Business Opportunities

[Vmarco]

Time to get some pharmaceutical stock in testosterone,…as millions of women seek to enlarge their clitoris’.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2783791/The-vaginal-orgasm-doesn-t-exist-s-clitoris-holds-key-female-pleasure-study-claims.html

[soaring crane]

Heaven help us

[Vmarco]

Heaven help us

 

Is there a problem with women temporarily taking a testosterone supplement to enlarge their clitoris? If Viagra has made billions,...a testosterone supplement for women will make tens of billions,...because unlike an occasional Viagra, women will have to use the testosterone supplement continually for 3-6 months to get the enlargement needed for a fuller female orgasm.

 

Unfortunately, heaven has failed a billion women world wide, by giving then a small, hardly orgasmable clitoris.

[Vmarco]

Of course, women seeking a more fuller orgasm through clitoris enlargement, will need to be cautious with dosage,...as 95% of F2M transgender folks taking high dosages of testosterone report constant, nymphomaniac feelings.

[soaring crane]

The article (and presumably the study of thirty American women) is full of qualifiers like 'most', 'tended to', 'may be', 'it is possible', etc... Shaky grounds for a shotgun therapy like testosterone to address a problem that in many (I know, another qualifier) cases may well have a socio-psychological backgound. Did they ask the women how happy they are in their relationships? What about their often puritan/Calvinist upbringing in the US? Taboos?

 

The article serves the purpose of getting Daily Mail readership to talk about sex (aka click-bait), and the study seems geared toward creating a therapy that could well be appropriate for a tiny number of women but which will be marketed to all and sundry. Just like Viagra. Ka-ching!

 

<deleted some stuff about sex and female orgasms>

 

something to add: The whole discussion could obviously result in many women feeling needlessly insecure about their bodies, adding yet another layer of societal damage to people who are already insecure and fearful enough. And the industry knows this and exploits it. It's the no-cebo effect. Instead of instigating a healthy self-healing process through positive imagery, they make people sick by convincing them there's a problem where there isn't one. And then they gleefully sell the conconctions and contraptions they thought up to combat the problems they invented. Am I too cynical? Yes, sometimes, I suppose.

[Silent Answers]

Loading yourself up on testosterone seems like a silly method to reach a non essential goal. Viagra is specifically for getting an erection. Excess testosterone on the other hand is going to mess around with a whole bunch of women's bodily systems. Plus, where's the control on size? If I was a woman that wanted an X sized clitoris, how would I ever reach my desired goal? If I stopped taking the supplement the effects would wear off, and if I keep taking it, I'm going to keep growing down there. Going in cycles of starting and stopping would just throw everything out of whack.

 

I've met women with tiny parts that were just as able to reach orgasm...Does having a bigger penis make orgasms stronger? No.

 

Nothing personal, I just don't agree with the article at all.

[Vmarco]

Loading yourself up on testosterone seems like a silly method to reach a non essential goal. Viagra is specifically for getting an erection. Excess testosterone on the other hand is going to mess around with a whole bunch of women's bodily systems. Plus, where's the control on size? If I was a woman that wanted an X sized clitoris, how would I ever reach my desired goal? If I stopped taking the supplement the effects would wear off, and if I keep taking it, I'm going to keep growing down there. Going in cycles of starting and stopping would just throw everything out of whack.

 

I've met women with tiny parts that were just as able to reach orgasm...Does having a bigger penis make orgasms stronger? No.

 

Nothing personal, I just don't agree with the article at all.

 

Good points. Didn't consider that subjective views (international groupthink) would argue with the results in a way whereby the story got squashed,...or that certain media sources would reduce credibility of a journal abstract http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ca.22471/abstract

 

Most people today are self-centered,....whether they be male or female,...for example, Reuters reported that 59% of women in North America have tattoos. Is body art anything other than self-centered? Likewise, at least that percentage would be interested in improving their sexual orgasms,...not only in North America, but around the world. Women, like males, follow trends. It is a current trend for women to be fully shaven, which can be ascertained from any porn site,...whereas 20 years ago, shaved pubics were rare,...thus another example of the self-centeredness of sheeple.

 

Trends are business opportunities for people who see the trend before the sheeple are swayed.

 

A few people have known for many years that the more aroused the clitoris, the more pronounced the female orgasm. Of course you are correct that saturating oneself with testosterone has some consequences not approved but current "trends," like bodily hair growth and male pattern baldness. But a new testosterone suppliment aimed at just clitoral growth, without the unwanted side effects as experience by female body builders and F2M's, would be a huge market, propelled by social media.

[thelerner]

Ah, the clitoris. Too easy, not really a challenge. Rather, it's all connected. There are parts neglected, parts that have fewer nerves, but that can be a benefit too. Slow steady rhythmic movements to the outside lower back of the vagina can create long sensual delight. There's the X spot infront of clit, and the Y spot above that. A whole alphabet of spots. Moving away from the genitals, it's possible to get an orgasm through breast touching alone. Using the right order from deeper to lighter to teasing.

 

Lots of opportunities and spots for the patient man to dance with.

Edited October 9, 2014 by thelerner

[Vmarco]

Ah, the clitoris. it's possible to get an orgasm through breast touching alone. Using the right order from deeper to lighter to teasing.

 

I agree with breast stimulation leading to orgasm,...for both females and males. But this "study" appeared to be focused on the vagina and clitoris,...suggesting that without an engaged or engorged clitoris, female orgasm is lessoned or unlikely. So, a question could be,...do females with larger, stimuatable clits, have more breast sourced orgasms.

 

From my experiences, with more females than the study used, the larger the clitoris, the more intense her orgasms, and subsequently, the more self-confident she expressed herself in her life. Keep in mind though,...sexology is not my field of study.

Edited October 9, 2014 by Vmarco