Synchronic Posted August 16, 2015 Interesting theory, it does sound quite similar to the "Laws of Attraction" but with some differences. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Michael Sternbach Posted August 17, 2015 Interesting theory, it does sound quite similar to the "Laws of Attraction" but with some differences. Â What's the difference in your opinion? In Lois' opinion? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lois Posted August 17, 2015 What's the difference in your opinion? In Lois' opinion? My opinion - join my "computer game". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted August 21, 2015 Did some one say 'Law of Attraction 'Â ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Michael Sternbach Posted August 21, 2015 Better believe it. Â Â Â Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Synchronic Posted August 25, 2015 (edited) What's the difference in your opinion? In Lois' opinion?  I can't say I know much about the "Law of Attraction" but I was more under the impression that it is more based on your own personal life and immediate surroundings/situation/physiology, rather than controlling large and distant events (like the collapsing of the Soviet Union). Perhaps LOA also deals with this range of scope, or perhaps the scope is of no consequence... like Yoda said...  Luke Skywalker: I can't. It’s too big. Yoda: Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you? Edited August 25, 2015 by Synchronic 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Michael Sternbach Posted August 26, 2015 I can't say I know much about the "Law of Attraction" but I was more under the impression that it is more based on your own personal life and immediate surroundings/situation/physiology, rather than controlling large and distant events (like the collapsing of the Soviet Union). Perhaps LOA also deals with this range of scope, or perhaps the scope is of no consequence... like Yoda said...  Luke Skywalker: I can't. It’s too big. Yoda: Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?  Well, I do think that mass events are created by the masses. Rarely will a single individual have such an influence, it would seem. Although we all know cases when an individual acted as a catalyst and unfolded a great influence, but those are the ones that get written down in history. Or so it would seem...  If Everett's Many Worlds Theory is right, then whatever could happen actually does happen in some parallel reality. This should also hold true on the collective level. So maybe as individuals we unconsciously choose also which collective reality we want to be part of? While another version of ourselves chooses another possibility.  Just speculating... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
