ralis Posted October 12, 2016 Time yet to talk about Jeffrey Epstein? Or the new lawsuit that will begin in December against Trump for allegedly raping two underage girls. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted October 12, 2016 or Bill Clinton's illegitimate son that bill used to send cash to every month....until they got into the white house, that is... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Karl Posted October 12, 2016 Time yet to talk about Jeffrey Epstein? then we would have to talk about Bill Clinton, which is, I suspect the real reason for rolling out the potential Trump connection. Then we have Wall Street and the entire hookers and lines depiction of the succesful traders with their links to Hillary. Can't forget about Rupert Murdoch, or Prince Andrew either. I can only imagine the kind of club that is generated by serial offenders who are immune from the law and have the sort of pacts that involve blood. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralis Posted October 12, 2016 or Bill Clinton's illegitimate son that bill used to send cash to every month....until they got into the white house, that is... Stay on topic JB. The thread is in regards to Hillary/Trump and diversionary/deflection tactics are derailing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Karl Posted October 12, 2016 Stay on topic JB. The thread is in regards to Hillary/Trump and diversionary/deflection tactics are derailing. Not really. Hillary has promised a twofor if she gets the presidency. In other words Bill comes along as a package deal. You get one you get both. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bax44 Posted October 12, 2016 People really believe Trump was being predatory with his comment. Hes a billionare who is swimming in Pussy. selectively offended. I bet though if Obama or whoever said it nicely enough, he could convince people to nicely and politely join a work camp. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ralis Posted October 12, 2016 Not really. Hillary has promised a twofor if she gets the presidency. In other words Bill comes along as a package deal. You get one you get both. I am acutely aware of that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted October 12, 2016 (edited) Stay on topic JB. The thread is in regards to Hillary/Trump and diversionary/deflection tactics are derailing. I think I found a great new t shirt Edited October 12, 2016 by joeblast 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted October 12, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uj0P0sD22M 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted October 12, 2016 how much more proof of electoral fraud do you want? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted October 12, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a-xjiXfJ58Q 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zerostao Posted October 12, 2016 http://www.democracynow.org/2016/8/31/a_new_mccarthyism_greenwald_on_clinton "Clinton campaign strategy is to resurrect Neo-McCarthyism to deflect from own corruption and betrayals. THIS is not lesser of two evils. It is the more effective evil:" ---sane progressive Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Glenn Greenwald says Democrats have adopted a "Cold War McCarthyite kind of rhetoric" by accusing many its critics of having ties to Russia. "It’s sort of this constant rhetorical tactic to try and insinuate that anyone opposing the Clintons are somehow Russian agents, when it’s the Clintons who actually have a lot of ties to Russia, as well," Greenwald said. "I mean, the Clinton Foundation and Bill Clinton helped Russian companies take over uranium industries in various parts of the world. He received lots of Russian money for speeches." 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wells Posted October 12, 2016 (edited) . Edited October 18, 2016 by spacester Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Karl Posted October 12, 2016 (edited) Basically it's Bonnie and Clyde. Edited October 12, 2016 by Karl Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zerostao Posted October 12, 2016 Basically it's Bonny and Clyde. nailed it 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted October 12, 2016 Putin accused the US of "starting this hysteria, saying that this (hacking) is in Russia's interests. But this has nothing to do with Russia's interests," in a speech during a business forum in Moscow. He added that the accusations were a ploy to divert U.S. voters' attention at a time when public opinion was being manipulated. "Everyone is talking about 'who did it' (the hacking)," said Putin. "But is it that important? The most important thing is what is inside this information. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted October 12, 2016 if we were a nation of laws... 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zerostao Posted October 12, 2016 http://ijr.com/2016/10/711753-watch-video-of-morning-joe-revealing-how-nbc-gave-help-to-hillary-so-hot-it-disappeared-from-site/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zerostao Posted October 12, 2016 if we were a nation of laws... laws are for only for the poor folks. they dont apply to the elite (unless you are in iceland) 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wells Posted October 12, 2016 (edited) . Edited October 18, 2016 by spacester 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blackstar212 Posted October 12, 2016 Established facts: Hillary says that if she gets elected as the president she will attack Iran. Hillary says that if she gets elected as the president a cyber attack (hack) by Russia will be treated by her like any other attack; in other words: Her answer will be to declare war with Russia. The recent claim of Hillary that Russia hacked her and enabled the wikileaks email dumps is most likely a lie which will worsen the already bad relationship with Russia on purpose. Trump says repeatedly that if he gets elected as the president he will get along with Putin. In other words: If Hillary gets elected, that will most likely eventually lead to nuclear world war three. If Trump gets elected, that will most likely NOT eventually lead to nuclear world war three. Obviously that is what this presidential election is about ultimately: The fate of the whole world is at stake. It is either Trump or Hillary as the next president, there is no third option. In other words: Attacking, not supporting or not voting for Trump means to lay the ground for Hillary, which means to lay the ground for nuclear world war three. So: How on earth can you not support (and obviously not vote for) Trump just because you dislike him personally??? You even attack him with everything negative you can find, while turning a blind eye on everything negative concerning the Clintons. I'd really like to hear your justification. wow lol it's getting really deep in here. Get ready for ww3 then because come Nov 9 Hillary WILL be potus. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wells Posted October 12, 2016 (edited) . Edited October 18, 2016 by spacester Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zerostao Posted October 12, 2016 laws are for only for the poor folks. they dont apply to the elite (unless you are in iceland) pti but this just in Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf finally announced his resignation, effective immediately. of course he is not at risk of going to prison for criminal fraud which is easily proven in this case becoz he is amongst the elite class. wtf is blagojevich in prison for trying to sell a senate seat while the clintons sold a seat on the State Department's International Security Advisory Board ?? to an unqualified (unless you consider cash donation= to qualification) rajiv fernando was a commodities broker and held no security clearances....the clintons refuse to answer any questions on this, to this day, and fernando continues to be a big clinton donor http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clinton-donor-sensitive-intelligence-board/story?id=39710624 oh yeah blago was trying to help poor folks from the tyranny of big pharma. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blackstar212 Posted October 12, 2016 I don't see you pointing out any logical errors in my line of reasoning and its conclusion and you nonetheless not being able to imagine the conclusion, that says something about your general mental ability but it does not disprove the logic of my line of reasoning and its conclusion. logic? Lol you posted infowars that totally disqualifies all pleas for reason or logic. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
