EPA under Trump WH

[gendao]

And here's where the EPA falls short - defending planet Earth against the ultra-deep state alien agenda:

Monsanto Colluded With EPA, Was Unable To Prove Roundup Does Not Cause Cancer, Unsealed Court Docs Reveal

newly unsealed court documents released earlier today seemingly reveal a startling effort on the part of both Monsanto and the EPA to work in concert to kill and/or discredit independent, albeit inconvenient, cancer research conducted by the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)

EPA effectively declared Roundup safe for use without even conducting tests on the actual formulation, but instead relying on industry research on just one of the product's active ingredients

In early 2015, once it became clear that the World Health Organization's IARC was working on their own independent study of Roundup, Monsanto immediately launched their own efforts to preemptively discredit any results that might be deemed 'inconvenient'.

Jess Rowland, the EPA's Deputy Division Director for the Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention and chair of the Agency's Cancer Assessment Review Committee, comes in to assure you that he's fully exploiting his role as the "chair of the CARC" to kill any potentially damaging research..."if I can kill this I should get a medal."

The Archons: the Shadowy Force Behind GMOs?

However I think the truest answer to the ultimate purpose of GMOs is to remember that humans pushing the GMO agenda are not in full control. The GMO agenda – just like the transhumanism agenda of trying to merge man with machine – has all the markings of an alien agenda. There is something distinctly dehumanizing about it. And when I say alien, I am not talking about physical extraterrestrials; I am referring to the Archons or Djinn, the interdimensional, non-physical entities that are beginning to be exposed by leading researchers in to the Truth Movement, from David Icke to Jay Weidner and others. The Archons do not care if any particular human dies, since they operate from other dimensions through controlling human minds. They cannot be harmed by GMOs; but they do benefit by weakening humanity’s collective health, because then it becomes harder for us to resist their psychic attacks.

If people could really grasp the enormity of what is at stake here – the very genetic integrity of our planet including all its plant and animal life – maybe they would understand the massive crime against humanity GMOs constitute. Maybe they would understand why Russia banned GMOs and why they now propose that GMO producers should be punished like terrorists.

 

[Brian]

This (whole thing, not just this article) is troubling on several levels:

Why Roundup Ready Crops Have Lost their Allure

Edited March 16, 2017 by Brian

[goatguy-too]

It is refreshing to read a forum thread on a controversial issue involving people from various parts of the political spectrum and Hitler wasn't mentioned once.   Some day we may eliminate forum memes like "Dems want mothers to kill babies" and "Repubs want to kill everyone by killing the planet" too  lol 

 

It's refreshing to see we have some daobums who want to kill off most of the population so that the population doesn't kill itself.  We just love to piss about war and over-population in the same breath.  We may not be in agreement, but at least we are at peace.

 

It's good to be back 

[MooNiNite]

 

Heck, when's the last time people here have even seen supposedly "common" North American wildlife like armadillos, wild turkeys, etc?  Or foraged a native persimmon or red mulberry?  And if so, how far did you have to drive to do it, lol?

Bee Lives Matter?  Nope, not in WEIRD World!

 

As the human population grows, wildlife has less places to live. especially when you're talking about them being commonly visible.

[MooNiNite]

http://trump.news/2017-03-20-michigan-gets-100-million-grant-from-trumps-epa-to-fix-flint-water-system.html

 

#DalaiTrump

[Trunk]

Trump’s EPA moves to dismantle programs that protect kids from lead paint

 

Environmental Protection Agency officials are proposing to eliminate two programs focused on limiting children’s exposure to lead-based paint, which is known to cause damage to developing brains and nervous systems.

The proposed cuts, outlined in a 64-page budget memo revealed by The Washington Post on Friday, would roll back programs aimed at reducing lead risks by $16.61 million and more than 70 employees, in line with a broader project by the Trump administration to devolve responsibility for environmental and health protection to state and local governments.

Edited April 6, 2017 by Trunk

[Trunk]

EPA staffer leaves with a bang, blasting agency policies under Trump

After 25 years, he [Mike Cox] retired last week from the Environmental Protection Agency with a tough message for the boss, Administrator Scott Pruitt.
...
The policies this Administration is advancing are contrary to what the majority of the American people, who pay our salaries, want EPA to accomplish, which are to ensure the air their children breath is safe; the land they live, play, and hunt on to be free of toxic chemicals; and the water they drink, the lakes they swim in, and the rivers they fish in to be clean.
...
They and their colleagues are dedicated to EPA’s mission to “protect human health and the environment.” They fear that Trump administration policies will do the opposite.

[gendao]

First Nations speaks out against WEIRD nations in first ~3 minutes here:

Quote

first nations people refer to as the “Boss” or “Master of the Wilderness”,

Edited June 26, 2017 by gendao

[Trunk]

EPA fires members of science advisory board
 

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) fired members of a scientific advisory board yesterday.

The agency quietly forced out some members of the Board of Scientific Counselors just weeks after leaders told them their tenure would be renewed, said Robert Richardson, an ecological economist at Michigan State University and one of those dismissed.

The board is tasked with reviewing the work of EPA scientists and provides feedback that can be a powerful voice in shaping the agency's future research. The cuts "just came out of nowhere," Richardson said.

"The role that science has played in the agency in the past, this step is a significant step in a different direction," he said today.
...
There are two main science advisory boards at EPA, both of which can hold significant sway over policy and regulation. The Trump administration has proposed a major weakening of both.

Earlier this year, the White House proposed slashing funding for the Science Advisory Board by 84 percent. Such a cut would essentially cripple the work of the 47-member board of outside scholars.
...
Richardson said about developments, "This is a significant step toward the erosion of science, and I think that it is happening subtly throughout the agency with this very large proposed budget cut to the Science Advisory Board."

 

~ edit ~

Edited this post to look pretty and include quote. 

I'd only quickly posted a link before.

Edited May 11, 2017 by Trunk

[Trunk]

Chicago just posted all the climate data deleted by Trump’s EPA

[Spotless]

This conversation reminds me a bit of spiritual "practice":

 

There are those that go about a rigorous practice and a life in practice.

 

There are those that like a less strenuous practice and generally do not live it.

 

There are those that regard it as exercise and don't really understand it at all.

 

And there are those that think it is "of the devil" or a least that it is poppycock and the stuff of new age nuts - placebo.

 

Those that have been assigned their new jobs in this admin in the EPA are clearly in the last category.

 

The are not there to shake things up and make them better - they are there to undermine its existence.

[gendao]

More wanton, WEIRD environmental destruction (another day, another story...):

Quote

The collapse of a tunnel containing radioactive waste at the Hanford nuclear weapons complex underscored what critics have long been saying: The toxic remnants of the Cold War are being stored in haphazard and unsafe conditions, and time is running out to deal with the problem.

"Unfortunately, the crisis at Hanford is far from an isolated incident," said Kevin Kamps of the anti-nuclear group Beyond Nuclear.

For instance, at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina, which opened in the 1950s and produced plutonium and tritium, the government is laboring to clean up groundwater contamination along with 40 million gallons of radioactive liquid waste stored in tanks that are decades past their projected lifespan. The job is likely to take decades.

In addition to the tunnel collapse discovered Tuesday, dozens of underground storage tanks at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington state — some dating to World War II — are leaking highly radioactive materials.

The problem is that the U.S. government rushed to build nuclear weapons during the Cold War with little thought given to how to permanently dispose of the resulting waste.

Safely removing it now is proving enormously expensive, slow-going, extraordinarily dangerous and so complex that much of the technology required simply does not exist. The cleanup has also been plagued with political and technical setbacks.

For example, the nation's only underground nuclear waste repository, in New Mexico, closed to new shipments in 2014 after an improperly packed drum of waste ruptured.

Gerry Pollet, a Washington state legislator and longtime Hanford critic, said the collapse of a waste storage tunnel at Hanford had been feared for years.

Hanford, a 500-square-mile (1,300-square-kilometer) expanse in remote interior Washington about 200 miles from Seattle, was created during World War II as part of the Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb.

Hanford made most of the plutonium for the nation's nuclear weapons, including the bomb dropped on Nagasaki, Japan, during the war. It now contains the nation's greatest volume of radioactive waste left over from the production of weapons plutonium.

The cleanup there has cost $19 billion to date and is not expected to be finished until 2060, at an additional cost of $100 billion.

The most dangerous waste at Hanford is 56 million gallons stored in 177 underground tanks, some of which have leaked.

Basically, as WEIRD and other populations do this:

Everything else on our zero-sum planet keeps doing this:

Quote

At this rate, there will be more plastic than fish (by weight) in the ocean by 2050.  Additionally, due to overfishing, pollution and other issues, more than a third of populations of marine fish, mammals, birds and reptiles have been lost since the 1970s, according to WWF.

Quote

"What we do know, from a variety of different types of analysis, is that many species of sharks are decreasing in population at alarming rates."

The causes? Hunting sharks for their meat and fins, and irresponsible fishing practices.

 

According to a recent report by the nonprofit conservation group Oceana, thousands of sharks are caught and trapped in fishing nets and other fishing gear every year. Some estimates say this unintended catch, or "bycatch," is 40% of the world's total catch, or about 63 billion pounds a year.

One frequently cited survey analyzed data gathered from fisheries between 1986 and 2000 and found that hammerhead populations had declined by an average of 89%, great whites by 79%, tiger sharks by 65%, thresher sharks by 80%, blue sharks by 60%, and mako sharks by 70%.

I mean, an 89% global depopulation in just 14 years???  I didn't even know we could do that if we TRIED???

 

Thing is, with 7.5 BILLION people now...even the smallest actions EN MASSE have MASSIVE consequences on the rest of this planet!!!  So really, we all have to start becoming far more conscious of our micro actions - which result in MACRO effects!

 

Any questions?

Edited May 27, 2017 by gendao