Being a Spiritual Mutt with a pedigree - Mixed Spiritual Arts (MSA)

[dwai]

In the Indic spiritual traditions, there are many different paths to the proverbial spiritual "summit". But generally they are broken down into two main categories -

 

1. Direct Method - This is the method of Jnana Yoga, direct inquiry into Self (Advaita Vedanta, Kashmir Shaivism) 
2. Indirect Method (various Yogas - Tantra, Kundalini, etc)

 

In the direct method, one directly inquires into the nature of one's Self, realizing that each of the identities we associate ourselves with, are not our Self (social labels, name, body, mind, intellect, etc) till we get to that which cannot become an object of inquiry (and is therefore called the True Self, the true Beingness, the true knowingness, etc). 

 

I have been lucky to have travelled both paths myself. Direct Method purists would probably consider me a "spiritual mutt", and I'm glad I became one. There are so many treasures buried in various spiritual traditions in terms of both wisdom as well as practical methods, that the journey of this lifetime became richer for me as a result of these, thereof.

 

My friend (who has recently embarked down the Direct Method) and I were discussing this. He knows I've been a taiji/Daoist practitioner for many years (getting close to two decades now), and also have undertaken studies of Siddhar Yoga, Hatha Yoga and vipasana style meditation as well. 

 

My Paternal Grandfather had taught me a lot of basics about pranayama when I was a young teenager and my Karate training later on helped with some of the meditation/breath-work. 

 

However, a lot of my early practice was really instinctive. I didn't have any teacher per se, but I had many teachers visit me and teach me during dream time. 

 

At that time, seated meditation was hard for me to do, still I was able to meditate after doing specific breath work (bhastrika, kapalabhati, bhramari pranayama). At the same time, I had started practicing Yang style 24-form taijiquan. Overtly unnknown to me, I was going through these transformations, the Qi sensitivity was developing, the Lower Dan Tien was formed, my 3rd eye was activating.

 

At this time I was also doing a lot of dream yoga (lucid dreaming specifically) and perhaps that is why I remember Swamis and Daoist masters visiting me during dream state and providing me with instructions.

 

Eventually I found Temple style taiji and my first teacher, Master George Bolger and I dived head-on into Taiji and Daoist cultivation.

 

When I think back to the early days, I think a lot of stuff was "revealed" to me without my knowing much in terms of concepts that I know now (wrt. spirituality). I was given a specific mantra in a dream, by a Swami, when I was going through an excessively terrible time mentally and also financially (without a job for several months). That Mantra had become a mainstay of my practice until recently and helped me go through a lot of ups and downs in my journey since then (for almost 17 years).

 

In course of my taiji practice, eventually I got a point where my witness self emerged quite distinctively. As "I" observed my mind-stream, first by starting to meditate in the gap between the thought (both during form practice as well as in seated meditation), I started to get alarmed and judgmental about patterns I observed in my mind. It took me many more years of silent anguish and finally my current teacher Master Jose Perez' "shaktipat", until I was able to come to a full realization that I was not my mind. The mind-stream is just a stream of objects that arise in consciousness. The underlying "me", i.e., the Pure Conscious Being is unaffected by the mind.

 

My friend does not understand Energy, he doesn't understand all these "indirect methods" as he doesn't have a feel for energetics at all. One day, recently while discussing jnana yoga with him, when i was giving him analogies of how one can get to the same state of clear mind/no mind with energetic work and how any repetitive action can result in meditation, it seems I ran into a brick wall (For him, the direct method works best). Taijiquan and qigong are excellent practices to take what we get in seated meditation/contemplative practices and extend them into moving state.  

 

He was struggling to figure out how he can get on the "same page as me" wrt. energetics and cultivation and I think finally gave up.

 

Thinking back about myself, for me the direct method was very hard initially. God knows I tried ...

 

When I first read about Ramana Maharshi's "Who Am I?" type method, I was nonplussed as I had no "bearing" so to speak. I was deeply immersed in Samsara and my mind had not developed the clarity (not the same as intelligence) or the stillness to know where to even begin. Only after the constant witness had emerged (and after torturing the limited self over it) did Jnana path start to work.

Don't get me wrong...I had the theory part sort of worked out. I had read my upanishads, yoga sutras, madhyamaka,  among other texts, many times. I 'got it' intellectually, but it was not a experiential reality for me at that point.

 

Right here on TDB, I've participated in many discussions (and some battles) over Buddhism, Vedanta, etc etc. At that time, I knew somethings "intuitively" and far less, experientially.  Now when I see people torturing themselves like I have in the past, about effort vs no-effort, I mostly don't feel like sharing my thoughts. It is easy to talk about the simplicity of the "truth", after it has "clicked". Otherwise one has no way to gauge how simple it all really is. 

 

When Master Jose told me the first time I met him, "you will be surprised at how simple it all is", I knew instinctively, but really did not know.  It is really simple, and yet almost all of us struggle over a "seeking", "a doing", in order to "achieve or attain some state or another". Yet in reality, it is something that is never apart from us. It cannot be found outside. 

 

Yeah, we've all heard the instructions of how we have to turn inward rather than outward, happiness/peace/God/Realization/Enlightenment/<Your favorite term here> can never be found in external objects. And yet, as part of our respective journeys, we seek objectively something that is the most intimate, most subjective of all experiences. It is always with us, never apart from us (Haha, and i also know how this type of platitude is bound to drive people angry, frustrated, plain bonkers with annoyance). 

 

Even in the inward turning, we try to turn the "within" into the "outside". As an object (or objects). This chakra, that nAdi, this Dan Tien, and so on. Until one day it becomes apparent...all of these are still objects to be experienced, but they do help point out the experiencer more definitely. Yes, Energy is nothing but consciousness. Everything rises out of consciousness, and sinks back into consciousness.

 

The purpose of my writing this long post is to share my thoughts and also seek to hear about your journey, my TDB friends. And to say, that its okay to be a spiritual mutt. Sometimes the mutts are the most resilient, and eventually we have to realize that a raft is only a raft, no matter how beautiful and awesome it is. We need to use it for our travels, and that's all there is to it.

 

Love and gratitude,

 

Dwai

 

 

 

 

Edited May 26, 2017 by dwai
grammatical mistakes :)

[Daeluin]

Many of my practices and understandings are of Daoist influence, though I find as I broaden my perspective to include other "dharmas," that daoism has not kept itself separate from these influences. This lack of walls is allowing much to fall into place, perhaps mostly because I am ready for it to.

 

Ultimately, I don't really think I am practicing any particular modality other than: Human.

(Which I hear is very similar to Tree, etc.)

[Taomeow]

Thank you for sharing your story and your thoughts.

 

Far as I'm concerned, the mutt is not a bad thing at all unless he or she proclaims muttdom to be the only true religion.  Too many newagers not only do but are fundamentalists in this -- they actually consider muttdom superior to traditionalism (which they have developed a party line to condescendingly berate), and themselves to lineage followers and to people who tend to stick it out rather than smorgasbord it and then move on to something new.  It all depends.

 

Also, I tend to think that it's age related (spiritual age, not necessarily biological.)  The young and inexperienced need to experience stuff for themselves -- in fact it is often counterproductive to jump to conclusions about what you're going to be cultivating too soon.  I've heard more than once from people who started out like that, "took me thirty years to find the teacher/practice/the real thing I've been looking for."  The danger here is to gradually and inescapably turn this eclecticism into the perennial dabbler's "Jack of all trades, master of none" outcome.  The remedy, from my perspective, is the taoist approach -- whatever you undertake as a pursuit on the side, you don't mean to dabble in.  You mean to match or surpass those for whom it is the main thing.  Or as an accidental "side guru" of mine says, "Take very good care of what you care for, and get rid of the rest."

 

 

[Brian]

I am a polyhistor and my personal belief system or worldview is a product of that.  My current "spiritual practice" is nominally a combination of Daoism, Buddhism, American Indian"ism" (whatever that might be called) & shamanism but its roots are ancient and I have come to realize the authentic threads of all traditions are part of a shared tapestry.

[RiverSnake]

Being a well rounded practitioner is of great value IMO. By well rounded i mean you can look at other techniques from different traditions and see the underlying "science" behind them. This is of great value IME as it gets you a broader view of the path and all of the different roads the student can take. 

 

It is the mut that i think has a higher probability of gaining this knowledge if he is able to experiment with many things while still practicing intensively in what he's doing (to much knowledge without practice is not good). I think this can be of value if one ever becomes a teacher because instead of just giving a student techniques you learned.....you can look at what "science" the person in front of you needs and create the techniques that will give him the most bang for his buck.

 

Were all muts energetically speaking as we have different powers and qualities of chi that we gravitate towards. This is something to be mindful of IMO.  

Edited May 26, 2017 by OldSaint

[C T]

When I was in my teens, I dabbled with Christianity and wanted to be an exorcist after watching that movie  

Why Christianity? Well, mainly because I had designs on a school mate's sister, and showing a fervour for Yahweh gave me the excuse to be close with her via bible study sessions and prayer meetings, camps and flag days (we sold tie pins shaped like a flag with a big cross in the middle). She was rather cool (and hot at the same time), come to think of it. The secondary reason, I guess, was simply to act rebellious - I grew up with a dad who practiced Theravadin Buddhism and a mom who devoted her spiritual self to Guan Yin and other Daoist saints and sages. Amazing how well they got along  

 

I grew out of that phase eventually, and gave up hopes of realising my rather dismal (so my folks said) career choice. 

 

Returned to studying Buddhism and works of some prominent teachers from other Eastern traditions in the late 80s, and took up serious Buddhist practice early '96. Of all the writings i had access to at that time, the ones by J. Krishnamurti impacted my thinking the most. His words challenged me, and formed the early catalyst that radically shifted me from under a coconut shell and made me want to explore greater mental and spiritual possibilities. 

 

I am always open to what others choose to practice (or not practice), so i wont really consider myself fundamentalistic, although at times I can catch some subtle dialogue going on in the background while in discussion over something or other. My reactions no longer prompt needs to argue or engage in conflicting debates. Work in progress... 

 

thats about it i guess.. thanks. 

 

 

 

 

 

edit/typo

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited May 26, 2017 by C T

[Stosh]

 "I am not altogether on anybody’s side, because nobody is altogether on my side, if you understand me: nobody cares for the woods as I care for them, not even Elves nowadays. Still, I take more kindly to Elves than to others … And there are some things, of course, whose side I am altogether not on; I am against them altogether" 

;)

[Brian]

2 minutes ago, Stosh said:

 "I am not altogether on anybody’s side, because nobody is altogether on my side, if you understand me: nobody cares for the woods as I care for them, not even Elves nowadays. Still, I take more kindly to Elves than to others … And there are some things, of course, whose side I am altogether not on; I am against them altogether" 

Trees are funny like that.

 

[AussieTrees]

From the tears of samsara and never ending machinations,even then the young Buddha awakes telling of a path with all might such path is both easy and hard to find wrong turns and thorn brambles exist then stop searching and you have found it

The path belongs to the Tao the path of life in the company of Krishna Jesus and Buddha then in such company what else matters

[CloudHands]

On 5/26/2017 at 9:40 PM, dwai said:

Love and gratitude,

 

Dwai

 

What is of first importance dear dwai -and more interesting that my spiritual life- is... where does your picture come from ? 

[dwai]

3 hours ago, CloudHands said:

 

What is of first importance dear dwai -and more interesting that my spiritual life- is... where does your picture come from ? 

Gratitude is born from love. So Love is of first importance, imho.

 

My picture is an ancient seal found at one of the so-called Indus Valley Civilization Sites...you can see more here -- https://www.harappa.com/category/slide-subject/seals

BTW: I call it the "so-called Indus Valley Civilization" because it really is the Saraswati Vedic Civilization

[CloudHands]

9 hours ago, dwai said:

Gratitude is born from love. So Love is of first importance, imho.

 

My picture is an ancient seal found at one of the so-called Indus Valley Civilization Sites...you can see more here -- https://www.harappa.com/category/slide-subject/seals

BTW: I call it the "so-called Indus Valley Civilization" because it really is the Saraswati Vedic Civilization

 

I was very intrigued because I thought the position was horse stance. 

[RiverSnake]

A useful article: http://www.strategicsorcery.net/the-rooms-you-get-stuck-in/