LAOLONG Posted February 12, 2018 It is from my old days, as a philosopher . In Western thought if you want to Define A you must define it with something that is not A . If you define A=A it is a tautology In Western thought . So the meaning of life in Western Logic must be something transcendental To life itself . You cant define life With something that is part of life. In Eastern thought the meaning Of life is life itself ( sachness ) A=A, and it is a pantheistic view . 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boundlesscostfairy Posted February 13, 2018 Yes, but what does life consist of? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boundlesscostfairy Posted February 13, 2018 Anything that youve ever done.. Your experience in this moment.. Your plans and projections into the future! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lost in Translation Posted February 13, 2018 2 hours ago, SHINTO said: It is from my old days, as a philosopher . In Western thought if you want to Define A you must define it with something that is not A . If you define A=A it is a tautology In Western thought . So the meaning of life in Western Logic must be something transcendental To life itself . You cant define life With something that is part of life. In Eastern thought the meaning Of life is life itself ( sachness ) A=A, and it is a pantheistic view . Well said! Bravo! This is another way to reach the conclusion of acceptance. Life IS the meaning of life so accept it as it is, not as you wish it to be. Thank you! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted February 13, 2018 I will still suggest that there is no meaning to life. It simply is. Because it could. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites