OldDog Posted June 28, 2018 In starting out to re-read the Great Commentary I was browsing around to generally reset my sense of historical context and to see what other more recent commentaries might exist on the Dazhuan. I stumbled on this article by Roger T. Ames. Â https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40636-015-0013-2 Â I am not familiar with any of Ames' work. I found this article to be quite difficult to read. Ames' manner of communication and use of language was pretty tough for me. He uses a lot of words that are just not in my working vocabulary. The article seems very academic. Â Still, there were a few insights I was able to gleen from the article. He also cites heavily from Tang Junyi, who I am not familiar with either. Â Thought I would throw this out there to see what the Bum's thought. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lost in Translation Posted June 28, 2018 This should make for interesting bedtime reading. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
