dwai Posted August 17, 2018 On 8/17/2018 at 7:55 PM, Limahong said: Once we transcend our limited identities, we are both male as well as female (or neither uniquely male or female). 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted August 17, 2018 On 8/17/2018 at 8:23 PM, dwai said: Once we transcend our limited identities, we are both male as well as female (or neither uniquely male or female). No, I have never been a female. I guess I have not transcended my limited identity. I think that's good. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dwai Posted August 17, 2018 On 8/17/2018 at 8:36 PM, Marblehead said: No, I have never been a female. I guess I have not transcended my limited identity. I think that's good. MH wasn't specifically talking about the anatomical layout...more a supra-mental condition. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marblehead Posted August 17, 2018 On 8/17/2018 at 8:46 PM, dwai said: MH wasn't specifically talking about the anatomical layout...more a supra-mental condition. Yeah, I know. But I felt the need to make myself perfectly clear on the subject. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Limahong Posted August 17, 2018 On 8/17/2018 at 8:22 PM, Marblehead said: I always looked at the women. On 8/17/2018 at 8:36 PM, Marblehead said: I have never been a female. On 8/17/2018 at 8:49 PM, Marblehead said: I felt the need to make myself perfectly clear on the subject. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Limahong Posted August 17, 2018 On 8/17/2018 at 5:14 PM, dwai said: There is no Shakti separate from Shiva. Yin and Yang are more "meta" conceptions, imho. Good morning dwai, Per the following, please enlighten on Yin and Yang as "more 'meta' conceptions" in relation to the non-separation of Shakti and Shiva. - Anand Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dwai Posted August 18, 2018 On 8/17/2018 at 11:57 PM, Limahong said: Good morning dwai, Per the following, please enlighten on Yin and Yang as "more 'meta' conceptions" in relation to the non-separation of Shakti and Shiva. - Anand By "meta conceptions" I mean they are generic labels for the duality of substantial and insubstantial. Different from Shiva and Shakti, who represent a specific type of substantiality-insubstantiality. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Limahong Posted August 19, 2018 On 8/18/2018 at 5:01 PM, dwai said: The duality of substantial and insubstantial. Different from Shiva and Shakti, who represent a specific type of substantiality-insubstantiality. Hi dwai, Please use an illustration for us to understand the difference between "the duality of substantial and insubstantial" and "a specific type of substantiality-insubstantiality". Thank you. - Anand Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dwai Posted August 19, 2018 On 8/19/2018 at 5:02 AM, Limahong said: Hi dwai, Please use an illustration for us to understand the difference between "the duality of substantial and insubstantial" and "a specific type of substantiality-insubstantiality". Thank you. - Anand duality of substantial and insubstantial - heavy and light, hard and soft, hot and cold, full and empty and so on. Specific type of substantiality-insubstantiality - Consciousness-Energy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
