Smile Posted February 6, 2008 I have a theory that low-intensity activity like walking or Taijiquan activates qi. This is why you don't feel tired after walking. I have the same theory. Any slow movement with one pointed concentration on it will do. Doesn't have to be taiji. A good excercise is walking in a circle taking one slow step lasting every 15 seconds. Max Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cheya Posted February 6, 2008 For me, "just" walking doesn't increase chi much, although I do feel good after it. But I do use walking as a chi building exercise. The difference hinges on whether I'm paying attention to the chi (for Buddy, "sensation") in my body as I walk. If I stay very present and keep my attention in my feet and legs, I have the sensation of energy welling up from the ground, filling first my legs and then gradually the rest of my body, and gradually starting to course through different parts of my body in gentle waves. As soon as my mind strays, I am "just" walking again, and have to start over, focusing on my feet. If I can keep my mind occupied in tracking sensation in each moment, I often get so full that I find myself at what Raymond Sigrist, over at apophaticmysticism.com has called "The threshhold of Grace", which borders on the ecstatic. It's just grand.One of my meditation teachers taught that chi can only be accessed and increased in the present moment, that is, when mind is strongly focused in the present. That is my experience. So my guess is, it's not so much which exercise you're doing, but more your ability to stay intensely focused in the moment, which determines whether you end up with more or less chi after the exercise. I also think that tai chi and chi gung and the other "energy arts" are uniquely designed to increase both energy and flow of energy (unlike western exercises, which are more about muscles than chi). So, doing the energy arts, you get much more chi bang for your time/focus buck. (Please note that I'm in kindergarten, if not preschool, in these arts.) Of course, if you exhaust yourself in any activity, you're not likely to have a net chi gain.So maybe any activity that keeps you intensely focused on the present moment (without exhausting or injuring you) would greatly enhance chi. Skilllful surfing has got to be one of those.A side note on chi walking and processing strong emotion. Sometimes I'm emotionally upset, very angry or grieving, when I start my daily chi walk. In my head, I'm told to walk it out, to allow the emotion, but to stay focused on the upwelling chi sensation in feet and lower legs. NOT easy when you're freaking out! But when I am able to do that, the emotion often changes to pure chi, just strong energy moving through my body, no angst, no pain. A similar thing has happened a couple of times when I'm getting Rolfed. Intense pain suddenly changing to feeling like the rolfer's hands are just pushing a huge wave of energy/chi/sensation up and down my leg. Has anybody else had experiences with intense physical or emotional pain morphing into strong chi sensation?QUOTE(Buddy @ Feb 5 2008, 10:30 PM)"This is why you don't feel tired after walking."Come on. When I had cancer waking made me extremely tired. Even no, with sciatica it does, because my muscles have to compensate. No need to talk about qi here.C'mon - it's relative.Cancer alone is going to drain your qi, as well as other health ailments. Not the walking itself, per se. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SFJane Posted February 6, 2008 (edited) C'mon, We have to establish that qi exists first. Â Â Buddy no offense how did you train with BKF and not understand how your chi works or at least have some level of conscious control of it? Am I misunderstanding you? I have read some of your work and posts here and there. I was under the assumption or impression that you can dissolve in both the Fire and Water methods. Â Of all the IMA people known and unknown that I know of, not one of them explains it as well as BKF. I had rudimentary control of my chi the first class I ever took with him back in 1996. Just like he said I would in the seminar brochure. Marriage of Heaven and Earth. It was phenomenal until it became old hat. Â I don't understand any of BKF's students and trainees that can not very deliberately control chi and intent after a minimal amount of exposure to his stuff. Granted, I had been doing aikido and kundulini as well as assorted occult practices before I was exposed to his energy arts stuff. Still, anyone of his programs should give the beginning attendee some basic control of their own chi using the intention leading methods. Â I know you do San Ti, That one practice is all you ever need to know to control awareness, intent and chi. It's a one stop shop for all your chi needs. San ti, circle walking and sitting are the three best ways I know of to cultivate. Â I'll try to address this tomorrow when I talk about qi. Â I look forward to this post. Â Â As for cultivating itself. Consider the nature of cultivating. Accumulating more energy and keeping it there. Â Physical exercise can increase chi, but also burns it too. To be cultivating, you should have more chi afterward, then when you started. Sitting and standing are the most reliable ways to cultivate. You can cultivate with soft relaxed indian yoga or tao yin. Â I believe that things like biking, swimming fall under the heading of wei kung or wei dan. As such they build the physical chi and the wei chi. That stuff does not necessarily add to your emotional energy, your psychic energy, your raw chi reserves, your mental presence. Â Nei kung and nei dan are cultivating and will restore and increase the various *chi* in your body. You spend a little energy and get a bigger energy pay off. Â If you want more energy, seriously want more energy, than just sit and breathe and relax. keep your body from bad posture and alignments, and don't think. Literally do not think. Still your mind, your emotions settle down, your body is relaxed and you start to recharge. When there is nothing taxing your energy, it starts to build up. Not a big secret or all that earth shattering really. It's pretty simple. Just have to do it. Â As for acupuncture and hsin yi. BKF explains it all very clearly in PoIMA. When you are relaxed breathing, properly aligned and pulsing your entire body from toes to spine to finger tips and skull when you do a particular move, the strong opening and closings as well as intent cause the chi flow to increase along certain merdians. If you pay attention, use listening skill on yourself, you will feel it happening unambiguously. Â But Buddy's right, don't worry about your acupuncture meridians when doing Hsin Yi. It is enough to know that the movement is occurring naturally, sink your chi and just focus your intent and your will and do the fists. The shen fa will come of it's own. Â Not that any of my thoughts matter because it's just internets. It is just mental masturbation without cameras, videos, witnesses and live bodies going at it and tires hitting pavement and all that good stuff. Â There is no point to talking about this stuff anyway since we can't prove anything to anyone on a forum and we all know Qi does not exist simply because it has not been incontrovertibly proven in the reproducible laboratory experiment or test. Â *just kidding* Â I will keep sticking to the basics, the 16 part nei gung system and my sitting and dissolving practices while all the chi-does-not exist folks wait for the PhDs to prove it exists before they get serious about nei jia and cultivation. Good luck with that. Edited February 6, 2008 by SFJane Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pietro Posted February 6, 2008 Buddy no offense how did you train with BKF and not understand how your chi works or at least have some level of conscious control of it? Am I misunderstanding you? I have read some of your work and posts here and there. I was under the assumption or impression that you can dissolve in both the Fire and Water methods. Â Whaa! "SFJane", and Buddy are speaking to each other. I can't keep my dick in my trousers for the excitment! Â WOW!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cameron Posted February 6, 2008 HAHAHAHA okay Cameron, ill keep training mate dont worry im sure ill make you work and you know you are definetly in a fight. Do we sign waivers for injuries or death, can Tao ums sponsor us for the trip? Â If my students in N.Y bring me over for a worshop do you think you can fly to N.Y, ill have a video we can youtube it? Â Anyway back to the main topic!!! Damn it Mal, shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh !!!! Â Hows your TongLong? by the way "Gung Hei Fut Choi" happy new year to you all! Â Â LOL!! Â Sure man, whatever you want. Â I think you are motivating me to drop IMA and go back to BJJ now, hehe. Â No waivers. Jesus I don't want to kill you bro. Tapping you out will be sufficient Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SFJane Posted February 6, 2008 I would wait and see if he actually answers me before going so far as to say we are speaking to each other  I have a lot of respect for the man from his posts. He studied with BKF a decade before I did. I just don't agree with him about the value of discussing these topics on a board. I consistently agree with him the only way to prove anything is to put your money where your mouth is in person. I just don't think that renders any internets discussion pointless. We simply can not all be in a room together to prove things one way or the other every time a contentious topic involving chi or martial arts or abilities comes up. Thus the boards give us that outlet.  The use of *prove it* in any sense online has only limited value as a trump card to use as the final analysis. Since we can not prove anything online, why even bother registering and posting about it? If you take that attitude from the beginning, we would not have these lovely chats. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VCraigP Posted February 6, 2008 I would wait and see if he actually answers me before going so far as to say we are speaking to each other  I have a lot of respect for the man from his posts. He studied with BKF a decade before I did. I just don't agree with him about the value of discussing these topics on a board. I consistently agree with him the only way to prove anything is to put your money where your mouth is in person. I just don't think that renders any internets discussion pointless. We simply can not all be in a room together to prove things one way or the other every time a contentious topic involving chi or martial arts or abilities comes up. Thus the boards give us that outlet.  The use of *prove it* in any sense online has only limited value as a trump card to use as the final analysis. Since we can not prove anything online, why even bother registering and posting about it? If you take that attitude from the beginning, we would not have these lovely chats.  Nice points. Good to see you here again. You have to excuse Pietro....he's Italian so he can't help it.  Craig Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buddy Posted February 6, 2008 Jane, I didn't say I didn't believe in it, only that I'm agnostic. I can do a lot of very interesting things. I want to be brief so here's my nutshell argument. Since you brought up santi... in anything I do with intention (even that is a loaded word, I could easily just say attention), I can (even without willing it so) make my palms red, make my fingertips sweat, cause my palms to slightly blister... I can move the soft tissue of my body, open and close the joints and internal cavities and vertebrae of my spine, move my organs, etc. All the things described in Bruce's method. Other things as well. So, is this because I am having an experience with something called "qi? Or is it simply my conciousness directing my intention (yi) to these areas and the body (nervous and circulatory systems) responds. Why is there an intermediary called "qi?" I can readily prove these skills but nobody can prove "qi." Not only can I do it, but I can teach it others. Â I can't move anyone with no touch without cooperation, cause newspapers to catch fire or break chopsticks with a dollar, levitate,...etc without trickery. And I don't believe anyone else can either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cameron Posted February 6, 2008 Thanks for clarifying your position on qi Buddy. Â I remember Ken Cohen write somewhere all true qigong Masters focus on Yi and not Qi. Yi leads qi. So your approach makes sense. Â I guess qi is just an easy way of describing the life energy itself. Probably a simpler thing to say is Yi leads breath. Or even attention leads the breath. Â So your basically just not into the mystical, mumbo jumbo, sorcery, Taoist Magic, Taoist Wizard, Shaman type of stuff at all and prefer to keep it as totally simple and free of mystical sounding stuff as possible, is this correct? Â I actually do respect this position quite a bit. Except I still feel a cool, magnetic energy when I practice kunlun. And I can't very well call this cool magnetic feeling that seems to move my body on it's own(even when I resist I actually forcefully resisist sometimes in my practice and the kunlun literally pushes me to move) I can't call that attention or breath. And Yi doesn't sound right either. So if you think Kunlun is bs that is cool with me. But that Kunlun is derived from some esoteric source outside the scope of general understanding and transmitted to the student by a Master via some mysterious process that I don't know how it works is the only thing that makes sense to me at the moment. Â As esoteric, Taoist wizard, mumbo jumbo sounding as that is Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buddy Posted February 7, 2008 Cam, While, like others, I am suspicious of Max's claims and downright deny anyone's ability to do the things I described in my previous post without substantial proof, I have not studied even a small amount of what is being called Kunlun. So, I'm not in any position to call the entire method BS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cameron Posted February 7, 2008 Cool. Well, thanks for clarifying further then Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buddy Posted February 7, 2008 Michael, Yes, it IS easy to use the phrase. But it's a phrase from a different culture that is highly charged and intimates a somewhat mystical quality. I don't assume anything, but I know that the nervous and circulatory systems can quite easily cause symptoms of heat, tingling, etc. Indeed, even if "qi" exists, I would postulate that is its interaction with these systems that causes the symptoms. For instance, light is not electricity, but is one of its effects, caused by it in some cases. Â Buddy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rain Posted February 7, 2008 (edited) ..................... Edited April 17, 2008 by rain Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gerard Posted February 7, 2008 Physical activity trains only wai chi or the external aspect of it (Yang). To cultivate nei chi (internal side, Yin) one must do what we all know in forums like this. Yoga and ZZ are the best exercises to cultivate "nei chi". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gendao Posted February 7, 2008 (edited) As far as qi goes - I think my most demonstrative experience was when a qigong healer pumped qi into me up against a big blockage. When she did this, I could actually feel it press up against the blockage and conform to its shape - as water would against a dam. Kinda like the liquid metal in T2. So, I think qi is just as the ancient Chinese described it - some sort of distinct orgone energy - not some modern reinterpretation in Westerm biology. Â But again, this is hard to prove objectively or over the net... Edited February 7, 2008 by vortex Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cameron Posted February 7, 2008 Yeah. Â When Kan(Max's student) briefly waved his hands over me a couple months ago it literally felt like my front channel was going to explode. Â I had no expectations at all. So what do you call that? A high level healer like Kan can effect your energy(for me it was unmistakeable..like an intense pressure literally pushing my blocks on my front channel down into the lower abdomen) and he didn't even touch me. Â I just don't see how I could say there isn't something to the qi thing after that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buddy Posted February 7, 2008 Michael, Â "Based on the very little I've studied, it seems to me that taoists were more interested in describing the subjective functional qualities they experienced rather than some objective physical description that fits the western paradigm of science. Â So, two things. Obviously they didn't have the western paradigm. But more importantly they decided not to speak plainly about things, which the western paradigm does (not taking sides except against the deliberate obfuscation idea). "Threading the nine pearls", "cinnabar field"...etc. These obscure references aren't much help. Â "Yes, but how do you know that it's limited to just the nervous and circulatory systems?" Â Please. I didn't say it was limited to that, those are your words. Â "And how do you know that those are the only mechanisms involved in your experiences. Is that just your assumption?" Â See above. Why would I consider that others are? Maybe it's the Pleadian grays that are doing it. I bow to Occam's razor here. Â "I'm not implying it's mystical; I'm only suggesting that science may have not completely categorized the experience of life." Â So why look for a deeper meaning when a completely standard one can be professed? Â "I just wonder if you really KNOW the mechanism for this phenomenon, and if so, how?" Â I never said I did. But beyond any evidence to the contrary, why not just go to the simplest and most obvious. I've never been to France but I'm willing to suspend my disbelief in it's non-existence. Â "If it's not clear to you, following your lead, I'm trying to understand what you truly know, and what you simply believe." Â Sorry, I don't quite get why this is confusing to you. Do you ever wonder why, when most of an atom is space and all things seem to consist of atoms, that you can slam your hand on a table? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cameron Posted February 7, 2008 Â See above. Why would I consider that others are? Maybe it's the Pleadian grays that are doing it. I bow to Occam's razor here. Â Â Â Â From what I have heard the Pladeans and Greys are two seperate groups. One human and "good" the other insentient and "bad". Â Just sayin' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buddy Posted February 7, 2008 (edited) Michael, "My thesis is this: It's the experience that's important." Â The problem with this idea is that we "experience" things in our dreams (or waking hours) that appear real. And our bodies (and minds) respond accordingly. We wake up anxious (or think that a mirage is real) or horny or pensive or whatever. Yet the experience wasn't real. Edited February 7, 2008 by Buddy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Oolong Rabbit Posted February 7, 2008 the heat and tingling are quite natural physical phenomena, already easily described. Â Interesting, but why do you suppose the first time I could really feel these things was when I began practicing taichi? Can you point me to some of these descriptions. Not trying to be fascitious, I am actually curious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wun Yuen Gong Posted February 7, 2008 If chi is lead by Yi couldnt it all be just in the mind? Â Cameron, Â LOL You have no clue, lets just leave it cause we are never going to fight enough with your tough talk of fighting you are more suited for Kunlun level 1!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites