Starjumper Posted February 24, 2008 (edited) Hi Lin, your last post is a little confusing, i think you need to edit in some quote marks. Peace to you, Starjumper Edited February 24, 2008 by Starjumper7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Satori Posted February 24, 2008 Hi Lin, your last post is a little confusing, i think you need to edit in some quote marks. Peace to you, Starjumper Lin is closer to the truth and clearly the wiser mind in this debate...and he didn't have to knock anyone down and pummle them with uppercuts to do it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Starjumper Posted February 24, 2008 Don't hurt yourself there, little feller. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
林愛偉 Posted February 24, 2008 Hi Lin, your last post is a little confusing, i think you need to edit in some quote marks. Peace to you, Starjumper Thank you brother. I took out my response to you from your quoted post. Peace and Blessings, Lin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Satori Posted February 24, 2008 Don't hurt yourself there, little feller. Always with the aggression. You aren't fooling anyone with your tough talk and you don't stand up intellectually to 90% of the people here. I guess the aggression is your way of compensating for your lack of experience. I suppose you drive a BIG truck too to make for that child's sized penis you most likely sport. FYI, I am 6' 5" and 240 lbs. Bring it pee-wee. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Starjumper Posted February 24, 2008 (edited) Always with the aggression. You aren't fooling anyone with your tough talk and you don't stand up intellectually to 90% of the people here. I guess the aggression is your way of compensating for your lack of experience. I suppose you drive a BIG truck too to make for that child's sized penis you most likely sport. Alright!! I haven't had a conversation this mature for years, keep guessing there, little one ... Make sure to not look in the mirror either. ROFL There were Bodhisattvas in the past who would teach reaching bliss states as an expedient means to attaining enlightenment. Reaching the bliss states with a compassionate mind eradicates bad karma and thus clears the mind so one attains virtue and enough merit to attain enlightenment eventually. It is but one of the many expedients to see clearly, as long as there is no attachment, reaching, grasping to the states attained. Theravadan Buddhists teach the Jhanas as a means to attain enlightenment, yet also advise the non-attaching of states as a foundation. I agree with this. Attachment to bliss states is meaningless, they are just something to enjoy, I call it frosting. Not difficult to explain at all. It may seem vague, and difficult to understand. That is fine because that is only as much as the capacity of the perceiver's mind can conceive. Stop putting a head ontop of a head here. "My version of enlightenment is better than yours" talk only confuses people, and steers them further down the defiled path. Enlightenment is enlightenment regardless of what it is labeled. It is much better to cultivate and attain, than talk about it, not cultivate it, and never attain it. This is why there is no need to stick to a definition of something that gets covered with more intellectualism. If enlightenment is a state, then it is only passing, and not complete proper enlightenment; Anuttura Samyak Sambodhi. Simply said: Talking about enlightenment is the same as talking about eating. You don't get full from talking about food. Yes, talking about it is pretty silly for reasons you state, however this is what forums are for is talk, often silly talk .... and people did ask questions. FYI, I am 6' 5" and 240 lbs. Lots of big rolls of fat? Edited February 24, 2008 by Starjumper7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Satori Posted February 24, 2008 (edited) Alright!! I haven't had a conversation this mature for years, keep guessing there, little one ... Make sure to not look in the mirror either. ROFL Hey, my pleasure there, cupcake. You know I'm just jacking with you because I like guys like you. Edited February 24, 2008 by Satori Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mat black Posted February 24, 2008 (edited) Can a consensus ever be arrived at as to the definintion of enlightenment? It seems to me to be all and nothing, other than that adjectives seem to fall short I like master Sosan's take on it. Every verse is full of enlightenment. Dive in.............. FAITH MIND Sosan Zenji (Seng-Tsan) - the 3rd Zen Patriarch The Great Way is not difficult for those who have no preferences When love and hate are both absent everything becomes clear and undisguised Make the smallest distinction however and heaven and earth are set infinitely apart If you wish to see the truth then hold no opinions for or against anything To set-up what you like against what you dislike is the disease of the mind When the deep meaning of things is not understood the mind's essential peace is disturbed to no avail The Way is perfect like vast space where nothing is lacking and nothing is in excess Indeed, it is due to our choosing to accept or reject that we do not see the true nature of things Live neither in the entanglements of outer things nor in the inner feelings of emptiness Be serene in the Oneness of things and such erroneous views will disappear by themselves When you try to stop activity to acheive passivity your very effort fills you with activity As long as you remain in one extreme or the other you will never know Oneness Those who do not live in the single Way fail in both activity and passivity, assertion and denial To deny the reality of things is to miss their reality; to assert the emptiness of things is to miss their reality The more you talk and think about it the further astray you wander from the truth Stop talking and thinking and there is nothing you will not be able to know To return to the root is to find the meaning but to pursue appearance is to miss the source At the moment of inner enlightenment there is a going beyond appearance and emptiness The changes that appear to occur in the empty world we call real only because of our ignorance Do not search for the truth only cease to cherish opinions Do not remain in a dualistic state avoid such pursuits carefully If there is even a trace of this and that, of right and wrong, the Mind-essence will be lost in confusion Although all dualities come from the One do not be attached even to the One When the mind exists undisturbed in the Way nothing in the world can offend And when things can no longer offend it ceases to exist in the old way When no discriminating thoughts arise the old mind ceases to exist When thought objects vanish, the thinking subject vanishes as when the mind vanishes, objects vanish Things are objects because of the subject (mind) the mind (subject) is such because of things (object) Understand the relativity of these two and the basic reality: the unity of emptiness In this Emptiness the two are indistinguishable and each contains in itself the whole world If you do not discriminate between coarse and fine you will not be tempted to prejudice and opinion To live in the Great Way is neither easy nor difficult But those with limited views are fearful and irresolute The faster they hurry, the slower they go and clinging (attachment) cannot be limited Even to be attached to the idea of enlightenment is to go astray Just let things be in their own way and there will be neither coming nor going Obey the nature of things (your own nature) and you will walk freely and undisturbed When thought is in bondage the truth is hidden for everything is murky and unclear And the burdensome practise of judging brings annoyance and weariness What benefit can be derived from distinctions and separations? If you wish to move in the One Way, do not dislike even the world of senses and ideas Indeed, to accept them fully is identical with true Enlightenment The wise man strives to no goals but the foolish man fetters himself There is one Dharma, not many; distinctions arise from the clinging needs of the ignorant To seek Mind with the (discriminating) mind is the greatest of all mistakes Rest and unrest derive from passion, with enlightenment there is no liking or disliking All dualities come from ignorant inference they are like dreams or flowers in the air Foolish to try to grasp them Gain and loss, right and wrong, such thoughts must finally be abolished at once If the eye never sleeps all dreams will naturally cease If the mind makes no discriminations the ten thousand things are as they are - of single essence To understand the mystery of this One essence is to be released from all entanglements When all things are seen equally the timeless Self-essence is reached No comparisons or analogies are possible in this causeless, relationless state Consider movement stationary, and the stationary in motion Both movement and rest disappear when such dualities cease to exist Oneness itself cannot exist, to this ultimate finality no law or description applies For the unified mind in accord with the Way all self-centered striving ceases Doubts and irresolutions vanish and life in true faith is possible With a single stroke we are free from bondage nothing clings to us and we hold to nothing All is empty, clear, self-illumination with no exertion of the mind's power Here thought, feeling, knowledge and imagination are of no value in this world of Suchness there is neither self nor other than self To come directly into harmony with this reality just simply say when doubt arises: "Not two" In this "not two" nothing is separate, nothing is excluded no matter when or where, enlightenment means entering this truth And this truth is beyond extension or diminution in time or space in it a single thought is ten thousand years Emptiness here, Emptiness there... but the infinite universe stands always before your eyes Infinitely large and infinitely small, no difference for definitions have vanished and no boundaries are seen So too with Being and non-Being Don't waste time in doubts and arguments that have nothing to do with this One thing, all things: move along and intermingle without distinction To live in this realization is to be without anxiety about non-perfection To live in this faith is the road to non-duality Because the non-dual is one with the trusting mind Words ! The Way is beyond language For in it there is no yesterday no tommorrow no today VERSES ON THE FAITH MIND by Seng-Tsan, the third Zen Patriarch. Translated by Ricahard B. Clarke. Edited February 24, 2008 by mat black Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
林愛偉 Posted February 24, 2008 (edited) Can a consensus ever be arrived at as to the definintion of enlightenment? It seems to me to be all and nothing, other than that adjectives seem to fall short I like master Sosan's take on it. Every verse is full of enlightenment. Dive in.............. FAITH MIND Sosan Zenji (Seng-Tsan) - the 3rd Zen Patriarch HAHAHAHA Wonderful! Edited February 24, 2008 by 林愛偉 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stigweard Posted February 24, 2008 I like master Sosan's take on it. Every verse is full of enlightenment. Dive in.............. FAITH MIND Sosan Zenji (Seng-Tsan) - the 3rd Zen Patriarch Ain't that the absolute truth ... hang on no it's not they're just words ... wait ... thought I had it for a moment ... nope ... sorry ... it's gone Hahahahahahaa Aren't we just so humorous with our controlled folly. Thanks Mat Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
林愛偉 Posted February 24, 2008 (edited) Alright!! I haven't had a conversation this mature for years, keep guessing there, little one ... Make sure to not look in the mirror either. ROFL I agree with this. Attachment to bliss states is meaningless, they are just something to enjoy, I call it frosting. Yes, talking about it is pretty silly for reasons you state, however this is what forums are for is talk, often silly talk .... and people did ask questions. Lots of big rolls of fat? The point was that it is better to cultivate to attain enlightenment than talk about enlightenment when we don't know what it is unless we are enlightened. Then at that point, what's the point of talking about it? Peace and Blessings, Lin Edited February 24, 2008 by 林愛偉 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
forestofsouls Posted February 24, 2008 The point was that it is better to cultivate to attain enlightenment than talk about enlightenment when we don't know what it is unless we are enlightened. Then at that point, what's the point of talking about it? My impression is that the goal defines the methods, and if one does not have a clear goal, then one will be stumbling around blindly in the dark. Perhaps we need a target until we discover there is no target. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted February 24, 2008 (edited) It seems as though the best any of us can do with respect to this is point truthfully in the proper direction, as none of us knows where it ultimately goes Mat...awesome, thanks! Edited February 24, 2008 by joeblast Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
三江源 Posted February 24, 2008 (edited) . Edited March 23, 2015 by 三江源 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Adam West Posted February 24, 2008 yerrsss, But. This was probably a sophisticated back in the days beofre plumbing and all. In the here and now, we cannot pretend to un- know many psychoanalytical concepts. They are part of the fabric of our minds: ego superego id persona facade schizoid split and so it goes on. If we ask ourselves this question, we dont penetrate from surface down to to the depth, we encounter layers along the way that our culture loves to excavate. And they are great places to get stuck. Actually I only wrote that post because I was thinking of Satori, with his big rolls of fat, jacking with Starjumper, whom he likes. Nice image. thanks guys. *stares out of window in a daze* Indeed! That's why, I would suggest, so few have historically realized their true nature - enlightenment, if you like. Mostly, we spend out lives stuck in the detritus of consciousness... In kind regards, Adam. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
三江源 Posted February 24, 2008 (edited) . Edited March 23, 2015 by 三江源 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
林愛偉 Posted February 24, 2008 My impression is that the goal defines the methods, and if one does not have a clear goal, then one will be stumbling around blindly in the dark. Perhaps we need a target until we discover there is no target. The goal would be to attain enlightenment. The methods thereof must lead one to that point. I agree with you. It is the thinking of enlightenment to be one thing, and when one doesn't reach the expectation, thoguht, of what they assumed it to be, read it to be, they find themselves on an endless journey. Pointers along the way would be a safer way. I was just putting out a caution. Peace, Lin My sense is that this question has been appropriated by the popular culture, and is used as the very epitome of circular navel gazing that doesnt get beyond itself, simply BECAUSE it involves the very concept of "I" - which, in this age of narcissism, is endlessly engrossing to so many. Interesting isnt it. Self knowledge is actually a good thing. And so is introspection. And if we dont have a secure sense of ourselves, we are certainly too fearful to Let Go. With regards to "enlightenment'... I dont think we actually have a consensus on what constitutes 'being enlightenened'... or even if that phrase is appropriate. Once again we are led astray by the fact that we are using the same word. We each have our experiences and beliefs about it. Anf they vary a lot, and once again, we are protective and precious about our beliefs. Our treasured beliefs, which we love... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Satori Posted February 24, 2008 Actually I only wrote that post because I was thinking of Satori, with his big rolls of fat, jacking with Starjumper, whom he likes. Nice image. thanks guys. *stares out of window in a daze* Like him, hell! It is much more than that. You may have been taken by his BS first but from now on he's my cupcake. He hits attraction buttons on me (like he did to you) that fall below my conscious radar and before I realize it, I AM RESPONDING. I can't help myself. Regrettably, I don't actually have the fat but I am willing to let the muscle go soft if that's what he would prefer, because I just love the way he beats others of greater intelligence and experience down with his never witty, yet always macho keyboard strokes. It is a good cover up. I almost forget the point he is failing to make and instead find myself buying his line of agro-debate based solely upon my emotion reaction to his manly views. I think I just need his Yang all over me. It fills my void. He's the self-proclaimed White knight/light of Taoism. His elevated position can only provide us guidance through the labyrinth we are so myopically trapped within. I hope he can save us all from bein stoopid more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
三江源 Posted February 24, 2008 (edited) . Edited March 23, 2015 by 三江源 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mYTHmAKER Posted February 24, 2008 YEEHAW! I feel a party comin' on! Cat which one is you Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
三江源 Posted February 25, 2008 (edited) . Edited March 23, 2015 by 三江源 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Starjumper Posted February 25, 2008 (edited) Actually I only wrote that post because I was thinking of Satori, with his big rolls of fat, jacking with Starjumper, whom he likes.Nice image. thanks guys. *stares out of window in a daze* Like him, hell! It is much more than that. You may have been taken by his BS first but from now on he's my cupcake. He hits attraction buttons on me (like he did to you) that fall below my conscious radar and before I realize it, I AM RESPONDING. I can't help myself. Regrettably, I don't actually have the fat but I am willing to let the muscle go soft if that's what he would prefer, because I just love the way he beats others of greater intelligence and experience down with his never witty, yet always macho keyboard strokes. It is a good cover up. I almost forget the point he is failing to make and instead find myself buying his line of agro-debate based solely upon my emotion reaction to his manly views. I think I just need his Yang all over me. It fills my void. That was interesting, I just got this image of a muscular gay guy, keep in mind I'm not saying Satori is that way {{{makes waffling motion with hand}}}, it's just that I got this image of a big muscular policeman party stripper type gay guy and he was looking at me in an amorous manner. Now that was scarey! Edited February 25, 2008 by Starjumper7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mYTHmAKER Posted February 25, 2008 good question mYTHmAKER! I shall ponder that at some length...... Hint - the one with the moustache in the background ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mYTHmAKER Posted February 25, 2008 Can a consensus ever be arrived at as to the definintion of enlightenment? It seems to me to be all and nothing, other than that adjectives seem to fall short I like master Sosan's take on it. Every verse is full of enlightenment. Dive in.............. FAITH MIND Sosan Zenji (Seng-Tsan) - the 3rd Zen Patriarch VERSES ON THE FAITH MIND by Seng-Tsan, the third Zen Patriarch. Translated by Ricahard B. Clarke. Thanks Matt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WhiteTiger Posted February 25, 2008 Beware of people who discredit experiences and who instead point back to the mind, they are the ones that are having trouble with the concepts while the shaman simply basks in the beingness of it. I don't mean to be mean Lin, But StarJumper, from his description of him unable to define (what he means by) Bliss, and Enlightenment, already shows he has problems with the idea at hand. This is because he chooses to talk about it (which of course words can not make up for experiences, but if the person we are talking to has experienced it in our life and can understand it from our own experience we can learn the real knowledge involved) only point to talking about such things... other then that to get an idea about something, which could at any moment be false. SO that can not be solely relied on) The fact that Lin stated that one can not define it means he has not experienced it... there for he can not talk about the sensations of it. He might have glimpses into it, from concepts he has read, tried to understand and heard from others, but like I said this doesn't count 100% because there is a chance of it being false. Lin, you have spent lots of time with these sorts of things. I applaud you for how well you describe experiences but this is one you, for whatever reason either don't know or purposely not telling us. Which makes you look bad in a if you compare it to the brightest purist light. StarJumper, thanks again for defining what you mean, I understand what your talking about but have not experienced it... so this is were my experience falls. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites