Stosh Posted June 26, 2019 It certainly explains why I couldn't find a map depicting the territorial delimitations of the Persian gulf vs international waters, and why I cannot filter the utub vids in the way that I want. ... y'know, If done properly ,the same algorithms, could be employed to diversify public opinion and bring tolerance n harmony. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
windwalker Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Stosh said: If done properly ,the same algorithms, could be employed to diversify public opinion and bring tolerance n harmony. by who,,,what would be the difference between that and whats going on now....its the same...Like most things it starts our benign and then metastasize into something else like a cancer... no thanks for me...... The thing is the US companies like google helped china make its "social credit" "China plans to rank all its citizens based on their "social credit" by 2020. People can be rewarded or punished according to their scores. Like private financial credit scores, a person's social scores can move up and down according to their behavior." as an example of how it works Now imagine all the "free stuff" in the US being tied to this,,in a way they all ready are.... The left is using, developing this system now.... In taiwan, you can take a picture of bad driving ect and send it into the police station,,,they pay you money... sounds good, until you find out there are people who make a living doing this... think about face book, twitter ect....people are already getting programed to interface with systems that will control them later.... Edited June 26, 2019 by windwalker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
windwalker Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) off topic / The US is still very low tech compared to some other countries give it time,,,,In the US its moving towards this Edited June 26, 2019 by windwalker Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
windwalker Posted June 26, 2019 15 hours ago, joeblast said: So long as you get and trust your "news" from the very mouthpieces of propaganda, you'll NEVER be able to believe a correct story. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stosh Posted June 26, 2019 "by who,,,what would be the difference between that and whats going on now....its the same...Like most things it starts our benign and then metastasize into something else like a cancer... no thanks for me...... The thing is the US companies like google helped china make its "social credit" " I totally understand the problem you mention , but consider this, the tech firms are here to stay , Yes? and a solution has to be found for the misuse of it , Yes? Personally I would rather see decentralization , but , if I can't have that, then they can still be a force for good if the execs realize that they are using evil methods , to try to assert a public good. The left likes diversity , right ? so it should be an easy sell, to have them try to promote diversity by presenting not only the items one initially is looking for , but , the alternatives which balance things out. Instead of saying, You might like this , and force-feeding all sorts of items which reinforce the echo-chamber , they could expose people to new ideas that can compete on merit. Broaden markets through advertising . Join the world together. For instance , we generally do not see the news from Manilla , so You click on a news tab for the Philippines , google translate kicks in , and we can hear and participate in the daily news of those people, maybe get a feel for the market forces, see a good travel deal , hear what they have to say about their governance. You are wishing to dominate the product , of an industry which will continue to develop behind the scenes , no matter what you tell them to do. If you control the Tech giants in USA to keep them under control, they will just shift to some other place and leave us at the disadvantage. Its the American way , to promote peace , merit , and unity ,,, by allowing free speech , competition , and diversity. Not to- suppress speech , arbitrarily decide merit , and box out competing groups. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
C T Posted June 26, 2019 Trump sanctions dead guy Ayatollah Khomeini https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-ayatollah-khomeini_n_5d11984ae4b07ae90da25eea?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000063&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=main_fb&utm_campaign=hp_fb_pages&fbclid=IwAR1WPbNes1QcEcfXpHgazEibeocMjrOelk6BH4f1dZ66PPNUsMgL-mDu6lw&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZmFjZWJvb2suY29tLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAJN2XTHhOjK1XW1U76drW7WjNAGwkmgD4eyEsCgm2jE2nB7iYJfUBmylRj3uF6n390pZ3gJimT_5O2jCSKH3C14lTHMEE5RN2yEIswumwqzRE0DYDgeFrP0b1TGg3niGL4x5k-eWOUZXPKBEmSEw12typjda4bbkWQLer8qOUmg1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
windwalker Posted June 26, 2019 1 minute ago, Stosh said: the tech firms are here to stay , Yes? No wouldn't agree with this. Its a matter of time, at some point they will be regulated or broken up much like the telecoms of the past.... It will be harder, the same underling causes prompting are there... I give it 10 to 15 yrs before it reaches max tipping point 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted June 26, 2019 9 hours ago, ralis said: What you stated about me is made up of conspiratorial nonsense which does not deserve a response. If you read books instead of conspiracy sites, we might have a discussion. I challenge you to read Arendt's work! I'd actually welcome debate with you, its just that every time we attempt it and all your fallacies and holes in your positions start getting pointed out, that's when you huff and puff and take your toy and go home and say we're not worth debating here. This ok with you, ralis? This is yet another instance of people with your beliefs disregarding the law because they *believe* their official capacity allows them to completely disregard their job and issue rulings based not upon the law but upon how they think the world should be. Do you know why Trump replaced so many judges, and why the 9th Circuit no longer leans retarded? Because all the subversive Progressive elements are being cleaned out of the system. And not only in the USA. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
windwalker Posted June 26, 2019 10 minutes ago, C T said: Trump sanctions dead guy Ayatollah Khomeini ya,,,looks like someone in his staff made a mistake ya think. Or do you believe that the president attends to all the details Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Stosh said: "by who,,,what would be the difference between that and whats going on now....its the same...Like most things it starts our benign and then metastasize into something else like a cancer... no thanks for me...... The thing is the US companies like google helped china make its "social credit" " I totally understand the problem you mention , but consider this, the tech firms are here to stay , Yes? and a solution has to be found for the misuse of it , Yes? Personally I would rather see decentralization , but , if I can't have that, then they can still be a force for good if the execs realize that they are using evil methods , to try to assert a public good. The left likes diversity , right ? so it should be an easy sell, to have them try to promote diversity by presenting not only the items one initially is looking for , but , the alternatives which balance things out. Instead of saying, You might like this , and force-feeding all sorts of items which reinforce the echo-chamber , they could expose people to new ideas that can compete on merit. Broaden markets through advertising . Join the world together. For instance , we generally do not see the news from Manilla , so You click on a news tab for the Philippines , google translate kicks in , and we can hear and participate in the daily news of those people, maybe get a feel for the market forces, see a good travel deal , hear what they have to say about their governance. You are wishing to dominate the product , of an industry which will continue to develop behind the scenes , no matter what you tell them to do. If you control the Tech giants in USA to keep them under control, they will just shift to some other place and leave us at the disadvantage. Its the American way , to promote peace , merit , and unity ,,, by allowing free speech , competition , and diversity. Not to- suppress speech , arbitrarily decide merit , and box out competing groups. "Big Tech" is "here to stay" but the things they are doing are not here to stay. Companies are going to have to decide if they are a platform or a publisher and that's the crux of the matter. I think SOME people are going to be massively surprised once "big tech" is no longer inflating their programmed-in viewpoint to front and center, just where the "general sentiment" of "the people" lies exactly. 23 minutes ago, C T said: Trump sanctions dead guy Ayatollah Khomeini https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-ayatollah-khomeini_n_5d11984ae4b07ae90da25eea?ncid=fcbklnkushpmg00000063&utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=main_fb&utm_campaign=hp_fb_pages&fbclid=IwAR1WPbNes1QcEcfXpHgazEibeocMjrOelk6BH4f1dZ66PPNUsMgL-mDu6lw&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZmFjZWJvb2suY29tLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAJN2XTHhOjK1XW1U76drW7WjNAGwkmgD4eyEsCgm2jE2nB7iYJfUBmylRj3uF6n390pZ3gJimT_5O2jCSKH3C14lTHMEE5RN2yEIswumwqzRE0DYDgeFrP0b1TGg3niGL4x5k-eWOUZXPKBEmSEw12typjda4bbkWQLer8qOUmg1 you realize this is all going after assets tied to the deep state clown network and their subsidiaries, right? if not - there's the hole in your observation there's necessarily plenty of head faking going on - and if you're missing that AP, Reuters, CNN, Guardian, et al are the media wing of the clown network's corporate branch - welp, there's another gaping hole in the analysis. how long did they work to obtain all that credibility, and look at how it burns so brightly now that its being expended in a great dumpster fire Edited June 26, 2019 by joeblast I'm not laughing AT you like ralis always assumes, btw. I'm just genuinely good natured and like to laugh and smile. ascii doesnt always convey that very well, heh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stosh Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) Its a matter of time, at some point they will be regulated or broken up much like the telecoms of the past.... It will be harder, the same underling causes prompting are there... Yes ,it would be much harder than the telecoms , so how do you envision they would do it, what would they look like ? Edited June 26, 2019 by Stosh Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
C T Posted June 26, 2019 10 minutes ago, windwalker said: ya,,,looks like someone in his staff made a mistake ya think. Or do you believe that the president attends to all the details He's just dumb maybe Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
C T Posted June 26, 2019 7 minutes ago, joeblast said: "Big Tech" is "here to stay" but the things they are doing are not here to stay. Companies are going to have to decide if they are a platform or a publisher and that's the crux of the matter. I think SOME people are going to be massively surprised once "big tech" is no longer inflating their programmed-in viewpoint to front and center, just where the "general sentiment" of "the people" lies exactly. you realize this is all going after assets tied to the deep state clown network and their subsidiaries, right? if not - there's the hole in your observation there's necessarily plenty of head faking going on - and if you're missing that AP, Reuters, CNN, Guardian, et al are the media wing of the clown network's corporate branch - welp, there's another gaping hole in the analysis. Joe, you're still as delusional as before bro. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted June 26, 2019 1 minute ago, C T said: Joe, you're still as delusional as before bro. So you havent figured out that over time, the perversion of government enabled the perversion of law, which enabled the perversion of money, which enabled the almost completely thorough perversion of the media, as it just keeps having to be used to cover for an ever increasing amount of ridiculous stories where the truth is so strange, any of the fictions resembling it really arent believable at all? Seriously though man...I've been posting example after example for a damned long time that shows how the perverted government networks overlapped and had a revolving door with the corporate networks, and they worked hand in hand with similar networks in other countries! There's been instance after instance where the media has not only carried water for, but worked hand in hand with their government partners in crime. Perhaps you think that these networks working together dont wind up aggregating to a higher authority, but the setup is pretty clear - nearly all governments on planet earth were subverted to a measure - and the cia & mi5.6 had a LOT to do with ALL OF IT. The bankers owned England in the 1600s, bro...you think they havent been at this game a long ass time? Its a nice way to look at the world, where such evil could not exist. But it is naive. I guess you can wait until the end of The Sixth Sense to get your confirmation that Bruce Willis was indeed dead the whole movie, but the observant noticed the clues that started early on in the movie Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted June 26, 2019 10 minutes ago, Stosh said: Perversion of money ? Spoiler ROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS: Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan Albania: Bank of Albania Algeria: Bank of Algeria Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia Austria: Austrian National Bank Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus Belgium: National Bank of Belgium Belize: Central Bank of Belize Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana: Bank of Botswana Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia Came Roon: Bank of Central African States Canada: Bank of Canada – Banque du Canada Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States Chad: Bank of Central African States Chile: Central Bank of Chile China: The People’s Bank of China Colombia: Bank of the Republic Comoros: Central Bank of Comoros Congo: Bank of Central African States Costa Rica: Central Bank of Costa Rica Côte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Croatia: Croatian National Bank Cuba: Central Bank of Cuba Cyprus: Central Bank of Cyprus Czech Republic: Czech National Bank Denmark: National Bank of Denmark Dominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican Republic East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Ecuador: Central Bank of Ecuador Egypt: Central Bank of Egypt El Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States Estonia: Bank of Estonia Ethiopia: National Bank of Ethiopia European Union: European Central Bank Fiji: Reserve Bank of Fiji Finland: Bank of Finland France: Bank of France Gabon: Bank of Central African States The Gambia: Central Bank of The Gambia Georgia: National Bank of Georgia Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank Ghana: Bank of Ghana Greece: Bank of Greece Guatemala: Bank of Guatemala Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Guyana: Bank of Guyana Haiti: Central Bank of Haiti Honduras: Central Bank of Honduras Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank Iceland: Central Bank of Iceland India: Reserve Bank of India Indonesia: Bank Indonesia Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran Iraq: Central Bank of Iraq Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland Israel: Bank of Israel Italy: Bank of Italy Jamaica: Bank of Jamaica Japan: Bank of Japan Jordan: Central Bank of Jordan Kazakhstan: National Bank of Kazakhstan Kenya: Central Bank of Kenya Korea: Bank of Korea Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic Latvia: Bank of Latvia Lebanon: Central Bank of Lebanon Lesotho: Central Bank of Lesotho Libya: Central Bank of Libya (Their most recent conquest) Uruguay: Central Bank of Uruguay Lithuania: Bank of Lithuania Luxembourg: Central Bank of Luxembourg Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao Macedonia: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia Madagascar: Central Bank of Madagascar Malawi: Reserve Bank of Malawi Malaysia: Central Bank of Malaysia Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Malta: Central Bank of Malta Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius Mexico: Bank of Mexico Moldova: National Bank of Moldova Mongolia: Bank of Mongolia Montenegro: Central Bank of Montenegro Morocco: Bank of Morocco Mozambique: Bank of Mozambique Namibia: Bank of Namibia Nepal: Central Bank of Nepal Netherlands: Netherlands Bank Netherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands Antilles New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand Nicaragua: Central Bank of Nicaragua Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria Norway: Central Bank of Norway Oman: Central Bank of Oman Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan Papua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New Guinea Paraguay: Central Bank of Paraguay Peru: Central Reserve Bank of Peru Philip Pines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Poland: National Bank of Poland Portugal: Bank of Portugal Qatar: Qatar Central Bank Romania: National Bank of Romania Russia: Central Bank of Russia Rwanda: National Bank of Rwanda San Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino Samoa: Central Bank of Samoa Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Serbia: National Bank of Serbia Seychelles: Central Bank of Seychelles Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore Slovakia: National Bank of Slovakia Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia Solomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon Islands South Africa: South African Reserve Bank Spain: Bank of Spain Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka Sudan: Bank of Sudan Surinam: Central Bank of Suriname Swaziland: The Central Bank of Swaziland Sweden: Sveriges Riksbank Switzerland: Swiss National Bank Tajikistan: National Bank of Tajikistan Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania Thailand: Bank of Thailand Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Tonga: National Reserve Bank of Tonga Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia Turkey: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Uganda: Bank of Uganda Ukraine: National Bank of Ukraine United Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab Emirates United Kingdom: Bank of England United States: Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Vanuatu: Reserve Bank of Vanuatu Venezuela: Central Bank of Venezuela Vietnam: The State Bank of Vietnam Yemen: Central Bank of Yemen Zambia: Bank of Zambia Zimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe The FED and the IRSFACT: US Federal Reserve is a privately-owned company, sitting on its very own patch of land, immune to the US laws. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
windwalker Posted June 26, 2019 35 minutes ago, C T said: He's just dumb maybe And just maybe, you will run for the office. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
C T Posted June 26, 2019 2 minutes ago, joeblast said: So you havent figured out that over time, the perversion of government enabled the perversion of law, which enabled the perversion of money, which enabled the almost completely thorough perversion of the media, as it just keeps having to be used to cover for an ever increasing amount of ridiculous stories where the truth is so strange, any of the fictions resembling it really arent believable at all? Seriously though man...I've been posting example after example for a damned long time that shows how the perverted government networks overlapped and had a revolving door with the corporate networks, and they worked hand in hand with similar networks in other countries! There's been instance after instance where the media has not only carried water for, but worked hand in hand with their government partners in crime. Perhaps you think that these networks working together dont wind up aggregating to a higher authority, but the setup is pretty clear - nearly all governments on planet earth were subverted to a measure - and the cia & mi5.6 had a LOT to do with ALL OF IT. The bankers owned England in the 1600s, bro...you think they havent been at this game a long ass time? Its a nice way to look at the world, where such evil could not exist. But it is naive. I guess you can wait until the end of The Sixth Sense to get your confirmation that Bruce Willis was indeed dead the whole movie, but the observant noticed the clues that started early on in the movie My position has been consistent all along - Im not taking sides - certainly my criticisms of Trump should not be indicative of support for his critics and those you call clowns, but merely a wish to pay attention to the details, many of which are self inflicted, of a gradual disintegration of a figure in an uncomfortable, ill-prepared position of power who keeps shooting himself in the foot. Its a comedy of errors somewhat, and thats what sustains my interest in this current time of the state of affairs in the US. Im constantly amazed by the amount of leeway afforded this guy - like, aren't any of you even slightly embarrassed by the never-ending bloopers that come out of this individual and his immediate circle of staffers, that, by their own actions, clearly show that the WH is underperforming due to a leader that has no clear idea of even the most basic function, that of manning a proper management structure and administering accordingly? Instead, you have a whole administration consisting of would-be heads of depts who are all in acting roles, unsure of their responsibilities, resulting in resignation after resignation, and those that remain whose loyalties are predicated on blind worship and zero accountability demanded of them due to the interimness of their appointments. Anyway, having learnt from previous experience, im not going to continue indulging in back and forths here as its a waste of time and energy. You guys have fun. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stosh Posted June 26, 2019 Great, the Federal reserve is out of reach of the DNC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
windwalker Posted June 26, 2019 43 minutes ago, Stosh said: Its a matter of time, at some point they will be regulated or broken up much like the telecoms of the past.... It will be harder, the same underling causes prompting are there... Yes ,it would be much harder than the telecoms , so how do you envision they would do it, what would they look like ? I think it's already started. All sides realize they cannot control social media platforms. They are entities unto themselves. In most instances are there countries understanding this directly control the technology and use of it, notably China. The u.s. is a little different in that it's going through a stage where the vaunted multiculturalism is actually working against itself. Each group trying to get as much as the free stuff as possible. The contenders from the Dims, understanding us all promise to give more and more free stuff. What it will eventually look like will be something like what is being done in China right now. Indirectly through credit scores people's behavior is already being modified. In some companies health insurance for example, it's cheaper for those who actively take charge of their lifestyles and attempt to live healthier ones. Culture itself is the basic glue the tends to mitigate a lot of behavior. In Asian countries this is very strong, with a long history. Keep America great, is a way of emphasizing community through shared interest defining a culture. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
C T Posted June 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, windwalker said: And just maybe, you will run for the office. One thing's for sure.... the next leader will have at his or her disposal a large blueprint of mistakes to use as a format in order to be better guided with more discretion. Anyone that comes after certainly will have a much easier job of gaining public support. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) 15 minutes ago, C T said: My position has been consistent all along - Im not taking sides - certainly my criticisms of Trump should not be indicative of support for his critics and those you call clowns, but merely a wish to pay attention to the details, many of which are self inflicted, of a gradual disintegration of a figure in an uncomfortable, ill-prepared position of power who keeps shooting himself in the foot. Its a comedy of errors somewhat, and thats what sustains my interest in this current time of the state of affairs in the US. Im constantly amazed by the amount of leeway afforded this guy - like, aren't any of you even slightly embarrassed by the never-ending bloopers that come out of this individual and his immediate circle of staffers, that, by their own actions, clearly show that the WH is underperforming due to a leader that has no clear idea of even the most basic function, that of manning a proper management structure and administering accordingly? Instead, you have a whole administration consisting of would-be heads of depts who are all in acting roles, unsure of their responsibilities, resulting in resignation after resignation, and those that remain whose loyalties are predicated on blind worship and zero accountability demanded of them due to the interimness of their appointments. Anyway, having learnt from previous experience, im not going to continue indulging in back and forths here as its a waste of time and energy. You guys have fun. Well, part of your issue is that you've accepted what's been put in front of you by the MSM, whereas I've actually done a decent amount of digging on what's been going on. There's quite a bit happening, if you havent noticed. (I know, you just stated you havent really been paying attention - which is why its somewhat amusing that you're so convinced he's a buffoon, if you really havent paid much attention and are pretty much only going by a handful of headlines. Its not exactly an informed position, though.) It'll be more noticeable when the winning switches from esoteric to exoteric A lot of things needed to happen for such a shift. Just dont forget that things changed in Benghazi 2012, when the good guys got their hands on the Clinton Foundation server located there and got knowledge of just what the fk the "Clinton Foundation" was really doing. The world owes Glen & Tyrone a massive debt and posthumous CMOH for what they did, for what they revealed. and THAT, is why Orange Man Bad its not necessarily ironic that it has little to do with Orange Man himself, but the bankster lackeys' networks losing their grip Edited June 26, 2019 by joeblast these things only make sense when the evil elements are included 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
windwalker Posted June 26, 2019 Just now, C T said: One thing's for sure.... the next leader will have at his or her disposal a large blueprint of mistakes to use as a format in order to be better guided with more discretion. Anyone that comes after certainly will have a much easier job of gaining public support. What they will have is a blueprint of an elected official focused on doing what they were elected for. They've already experienced the last 8 years of an Administration ran on an ideology, couched in a smooth-talking format developed by a professor from academia, student of Saul Alinsky. We now have people from the same party running on giving away free stuff, supporting their own ideologies based on socialism. One thing I've always noted, they all like to give away free stuff until it's there's stuff that they're giving away. They never managed to do that. Why is that 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
C T Posted June 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, joeblast said: Well, part of your issue is that you've accepted what's been put in front of you by the MSM, whereas I've actually done a decent amount of digging on what's been going on. There's quite a bit happening, if you havent noticed. (I know, you just stated you havent really been paying attention - which is why its somewhat amusing that you're so convinced he's a buffoon, if you really havent paid much attention and are pretty much only going by a handful of headlines. Its not exactly an informed position, though.) It'll be more noticeable when the winning switches from esoteric to exoteric A lot of things needed to happen for such a shift. Just dont forget that things changed in Benghazi 2012, when the good guys got their hands on the Clinton Foundation server located there and got knowledge of just what the fk the "Clinton Foundation" was really doing. The world owes Glen & Tyrone a massive debt and posthumous CMOH for what they did, for what they revealed. and THAT, is why Orange Man Bad its not necessarily ironic that it has little to do with Orange Man himself, but the bankster lackeys' networks losing their grip One can do better than to justify mismanagement due to previous administrative errors. Even a novice manager will have learnt this, hopefully, if they have even a smidgen of intelligence. But I like your onslaught of assumptions that others have fallen short on their attentiveness to whats really going on. lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
joeblast Posted June 26, 2019 (edited) 26 minutes ago, C T said: One can do better than to justify mismanagement due to previous administrative errors. Even a novice manager will have learnt this, hopefully, if they have even a smidgen of intelligence. But I like your onslaught of assumptions that others have fallen short on their attentiveness to whats really going on. lol It appears you also missed out on the massive exodus in the legislature, in the justice branches, in the courts... bro, the networks of subversion...what do you think they do....they subvert the laws of the country. like what I just posted to ralis, where a judge decides to break federal laws because it helps further subvert the country to have shit tons of illegals to help inflate voter rolls where needed. trump has given some a chance, and if they step out of line he fires 'em. some get brought in to do certain jobs and once the task is complete they move on and someone else goes to the position. sometimes people have gone from one position to another to another (eg pompeo.) its literally a fight for the future of the planet - do you want to live on Bankster Planet where the governments & their agents act like V for Vendetta? or do you want to have a peaceful rational law abiding society that doesnt have a two tiered justice system, one of which is applied to the players in the subversion networks, one that applies to the rest of everyone. so a lot of this movement is getting bad players to reveal themselves, too - why all the leak this and leak that, why doesnt it really happen anymore? except where this asshat leaked the ICE raids - oops that ammo's expended now, it cant be used again. that's what I mean by ammo is expensive. once an asset gets used at this stage of the game, most of the are single-use characters. that's why I said the central banks must die, they must go the way of the dodo, they are obsolete and nothing but parasites on humanity. the BIS and all related entities must be taken to the woodshed and be hacked apart unmercifully, and the nations of the world should all feast upon the remains equally. it was the perversion of money that necessitated the creation of the subversion networks (which are really simply sort of just letting corrupt players do what they will naturally - but only if they are on board and can be controlled! dissenters are eliminated!) its all to uphold the primary fraud - the ongoing theft of the fruits of people's labor I'm more focused on the big picture here - trivial details like "oh, they appear to be in disarray, the papers even said so!" just doesnt even blip my radar. Edited June 26, 2019 by joeblast 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
