Reconstructing prehistoric rainfall

[themiddleway]

By studying an ice record spanning 1,013 years, our results reveal a clear story of wetter wet periods and drier dry periods than is evident in Australia’s much shorter instrumental weather record.
 

https://theconversation.com/antarctic-ice-shows-australias-drought-and-flood-risk-is-worse-than-thought-59165

https://theconversation.com/500-years-of-drought-and-flood-trees-and-corals-reveal-australias-climate-history-51573

 

 

 

[Lairg]

Imagine what a million year record would tell us about climate cycles

 

Here is the US Sec Defense in 1997

" Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. "

https://web.archive.org/web/20061028122305/http://www.fas.org/news/usa/1997/04/bmd970429d.htm

 

I wonder what another 25 years of development has done with weather weapons.   

 

Mostly when I test extreme weather events they show at least as artificially enhanced 

 

Consider for example the G20 in Brisbane in 2014, where no one would sit with Putin at lunch.  Within a week there was a sequence of extreme unforecast weather events on the Aust east coast - each causing billions of dollars of damage.   

 

The week of extreme storms in Sydney were referred to at the time as:  evil

 

Just luck I suppose

 

 

 

Edited May 15, 2022 by Lairg

[themiddleway]

It’s complicated, Chris Rentsch has proven that CO2 inhibits out going radiation.

In his words : 

My research seeks to avoid the uncertainties inherent to climate models by instead analyzing spectroscopic satellite data to empirically measure the forcing effects of rising CO₂.

 

Where was the core, fundamental study experimentally verifying that higher CO₂ produces the expected reduction in outgoing infrared radiation?

 

http://www.electricalfun.com/ElectronCafe/RF_at_TOA.aspx

Edited May 15, 2022 by themiddleway

[ralis]

2 hours ago, themiddleway said:

It’s complicated, Chris Rentsch has proven that CO2 inhibits out going radiation.

In his words : 

My research seeks to avoid the uncertainties inherent to climate models by instead analyzing spectroscopic satellite data to empirically measure the forcing effects of rising CO₂.

 

Where was the core, fundamental study experimentally verifying that higher CO₂ produces the expected reduction in outgoing infrared radiation?

 

http://www.electricalfun.com/ElectronCafe/RF_at_TOA.aspx

 

It is easy to cut/paste here, but I find very little on Chris Rentsch except a few articles and interviews nor find curriculum vitae. Is he a research scientist employed by academia or elsewhere? It is important to know this.

Edited May 15, 2022 by ralis

[ralis]

4 hours ago, Lairg said:

Imagine what a million year record would tell us about climate cycles

 

Here is the US Sec Defense in 1997

" Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. "

https://web.archive.org/web/20061028122305/http://www.fas.org/news/usa/1997/04/bmd970429d.htm

 

I wonder what another 25 years of development has done with weather weapons.   

 

Mostly when I test extreme weather events they show at least as artificially enhanced 

 

Consider for example the G20 in Brisbane in 2014, where no one would sit with Putin at lunch.  Within a week there was a sequence of extreme unforecast weather events on the Aust east coast - each causing billions of dollars of damage.   

 

The week of extreme storms in Sydney were referred to at the time as:  evil

 

Just luck I suppose

 

 

 

 

More conspiracies again as published by Tom Bearden et al? Weather engineering?

[Lairg]

In that case it was the US Sec Defense that was propagating that conspiracy.  

 

My own view is that all politics is based on conspiracies

Edited May 15, 2022 by Lairg

[ralis]

8 hours ago, Lairg said:

In that case it was the US Sec Defense that was propagating that conspiracy.  

 

My own view is that all politics is based on conspiracies

 

I did a Google search and find no credible link to where he made such a statement. I always do my own research!

 

All politics are not based in conspiracy nonsense. Conspiracies are always on the menu for gullible right wing sycophants. E.g. Qanon etc.

[Lairg]

6 hours ago, ralis said:

did a Google search and find no credible link to where he made such a statement.

 

Lucky that Google does not censor its searches 

 

Still at least the web  archive still has the original texts for those that prefer originals

Edited May 15, 2022 by Lairg