Sir Darius the Clairvoyent Posted November 20, 2023 So, in what cultures where they common before christianity, did they represent the same, how far can it be thraced back etc. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted November 20, 2023 I have a long paper on it , but not just before Christianity , on the basic aspects of the concept as a principle in nature , physics (including sub atomic physics ) , cosmology , philosophy and religions .... if you want to read it . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Darius the Clairvoyent Posted November 20, 2023 6 minutes ago, Nungali said: I have a long paper on it , but not just before Christianity , on the basic aspects of the concept as a principle in nature , physics (including sub atomic physics ) , cosmology , philosophy and religions .... if you want to read it . Please share Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted November 20, 2023 Okay ... I cant find the posts here and it appears to have vanished off my desktop . I will hunt for one of my flash drives and try to copy it to here later . 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maddie Posted November 21, 2023 Hinduism has the Trinity of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva. The creator, the sustainer, and the destroyer. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
old3bob Posted November 21, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, Maddie said: Hinduism has the Trinity of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva. The creator, the sustainer, and the destroyer. Hinduism also has Brahman beyond all categories, including the three mentioned. (or the Self, for instance per the Upanishads), Edited November 21, 2023 by old3bob Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maddie Posted November 21, 2023 5 hours ago, old3bob said: Hinduism also has Brahman beyond all categories, including the three mentioned. (or the Self, for instance per the Upanishads), You're correct but the question was about trinity's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
doc benway Posted November 21, 2023 Buddhism has the trinity of the three kayas - the enlightened body, speech, and mind (dharmakaya, sambhogakaya, and nirmianakaya) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Darius the Clairvoyent Posted November 21, 2023 5 minutes ago, steve said: Buddhism has the trinity of the three kayas - the enlightened body, speech, and mind (dharmakaya, sambhogakaya, and nirmianakaya) Reminds me of the etymology of Wotan, Villi and Ve (Odin and his brothers, creator of mankind), which translates to shamanic fury, the will and the sacred. Thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis. It works for loads of stuff, and it makes sense. I should probally post this in @Nungalis thread, but i havent got around to reading it yet. But i will. Makes sense tho. How we start as one ocean, duality arises from a induviduated observer, a wave in the ocean, and a trinitarian unity is what we are left with when we combine duality and «all is one». Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
old3bob Posted November 21, 2023 3 hours ago, Maddie said: You're correct but the question was about trinity's. just making it clear that that is not the end of the story... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maddie Posted November 21, 2023 Just now, old3bob said: just making it clear that that is not the end of the story... The clarification has been accomplished 🙂😉 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maddie Posted November 21, 2023 Let's not forget the most important Trinity ever 1 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
doc benway Posted November 21, 2023 Most important? Hmmm…. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted November 21, 2023 3 is possibly the most important number in engineering. It's best known best for its remarkable strength and stability. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted November 21, 2023 5 hours ago, Maddie said: Let's not forget the most important Trinity ever Check out those baps ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted November 21, 2023 Above we have an image of the three Gunas ; 7 hours ago, NaturaNaturans said: Reminds me of the etymology of Wotan, Villi and Ve (Odin and his brothers, creator of mankind), which translates to shamanic fury, the will and the sacred. Thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis. It works for loads of stuff, and it makes sense. I should probally post this in @Nungalis thread, but i havent got around to reading it yet. But i will. Makes sense tho. How we start as one ocean, duality arises from a induviduated observer, a wave in the ocean, and a trinitarian unity is what we are left with when we combine duality and «all is one». read it ... you will see how the 3 : 4 'thing' is a universal principle . ie; 3 things come together to form an 'ideal' (non material , but 'real ) form or pattern and from this emerges , or they result in, a 4th material , or 'further towards material' product . Its basic '4 element' theory ; fire water air ... earth 'solid material reality stuff ' . 4 principles each in 3 modes with a 'quintessential' 'apart from that' origin . ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintessence ) I postulate it came from the pattern of the human hand ; four fingers in 3 parts and a thumb ... or the pattern is just so universal that it works good for a hand < shrug > . The 4 powers of physics ; electo-magnetic force, strong force, weak force, ( which can all be 'unified' ) and Gravity . They cant fit gravity into the 'Unified field' theory as it , according to this concept, is 'out side' ... or a 'result of' the other three . There is an old thread around somewhere where we played with moving the G constant to the other side of the accepted formulae ... ie AFTER the = sign and not before it . The other addition to the 3:4 pattern is often a 7 based system , which I think was based on the observation of the 7 'heavenly wanderers ' . The Principles Mysterious Energy, triform, mysterious Matter, in fourfold and sevenfold division, the interplay of which things weave the dance of the Veil of Life upon the Face of the Spirit ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted November 21, 2023 Lets do some 'geometry' of consciousness / coming into existence : First is 1 , the point , a concept with no dimensional measurements . The point can only be aware of itself as nothing else exists yet . But it can be aware of itself , so we have extended awareness to two things ; the point itself and its awareness of itself . The point has moved , 'as it where ' to go 'outside itself ' to 'look back at itself ' , 'to consider what it might be . A moving point defines a line . We are in one dimension . The point 'self' and the 'awareness of / looking at the point / self creates an opinion , observation , understanding ... a third thing . Now we have three points on the one dimensional field ; a triangle and the concept of 2D ; the 'surface ' . Its all ' flat ' and in the 'ideal world ' , above normal perceptions . To cross this 'abyss ', we have to come 'up' from the surface and create a 3D 'shape ' . so first (is actually 0 , that 'field we are imagining this in ' , or the 'time space continuum ' as some prefer ) is point, then line, surface (all ideal concepts , even in drawn geometry a line has thickness and depth as well as length ) and then shape . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cobie Posted November 21, 2023 (edited) In the lyrics: “I gave her my heart but she wanted my soul“ What does that mean? Edited July 19 by Cobie Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted November 21, 2023 Her meaning : He didnt go deep enough . His meaning : Women are never satisfied . My meaning ; He got frightened when , after giving her his heart , he felt his illusion of individual self dissolving and the 'barrier' that separated him from her , no longer being there . 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maddie Posted November 21, 2023 Huh I thought that was a Bob Dylan song? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Darius the Clairvoyent Posted November 21, 2023 1 hour ago, Nungali said: Above we have an image of the three Gunas ; read it ... you will see how the 3 : 4 'thing' is a universal principle . ie; 3 things come together to form an 'ideal' (non material , but 'real ) form or pattern and from this emerges , or they result in, a 4th material , or 'further towards material' product . Its basic '4 element' theory ; fire water air ... earth 'solid material reality stuff ' . 4 principles each in 3 modes with a 'quintessential' 'apart from that' origin . ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintessence ) I postulate it came from the pattern of the human hand ; four fingers in 3 parts and a thumb ... or the pattern is just so universal that it works good for a hand < shrug > . The 4 powers of physics ; electo-magnetic force, strong force, weak force, ( which can all be 'unified' ) and Gravity . They cant fit gravity into the 'Unified field' theory as it , according to this concept, is 'out side' ... or a 'result of' the other three . There is an old thread around somewhere where we played with moving the G constant to the other side of the accepted formulae ... ie AFTER the = sign and not before it . The other addition to the 3:4 pattern is often a 7 based system , which I think was based on the observation of the 7 'heavenly wanderers ' . The Principles Mysterious Energy, triform, mysterious Matter, in fourfold and sevenfold division, the interplay of which things weave the dance of the Veil of Life upon the Face of the Spirit ... I will sir, but right now i need to hammer Out 50 Pages in ten days, so… priorites. But i do appreicate it. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zhongyongdaoist Posted November 22, 2023 My favorite Trinity is the Three Pure Ones, you can read about them in Wikipedia article linked below: The Pure Ones There are many pictures of them on the internet, such as the pretty ones below: As to the notion that this type of practice is a religion, I have said this elsewhere: On 8/5/2022 at 10:24 AM, Zhongyongdaoist said: I am in complete disagreement with the notion that "Daoism is a religion". As far as I am concerned as a practitioner of what is usually referred to as "Relitigous Daoism", that it is a complete misnomer to call it such foisted on it by Western scholars of "religions", that it would be more properly referred to as "Ritual Daoism" and its structure would be better modeled by something like Freemasonry. Basically Ritual Daosim was developed by Fangshi for Fangshi, as a combination of professional guild and teaching hall and has nothing to do with the "worship" of gods in the sense of a grovelling submission to such beings motivated by threats of punishment and promises of rewards for such behavior. It's all about learning and practicing magic, which involves a great deal of time and study as anyone who has read and studied the works of Professor Jerry Alan Johnson can amply justify. (Emphasis mine, ZYD) Even the famous Freemason author J. S. M. Ward would agree with this assessment and a treatment of it such is he gave the Hung Society as he gave in his three volume account of its rites and teachings. Those who are interested can follow the links below to nice PDFs. Personally, I have a first edition signed by the author, but these PDF are very useful for study. Volume One Volume Two Volume Three You can read about the history of the Hung Society on Wikipedia here: Tiandihui I am quite aware of the organization's unsavory later history, but the above information is provided here as an example of how Ritual Daoism should be regarded and treated in my opinion. Now for a little historical background on the development of the Trinity concept in Chistianity, which, as will probably surprise many people has its origin in Plato, not the Hebrew Old Testament, as is made clear by the following quoted from the Stanford Encyclopedia article on the development of Trinitarian doctrine: Quote 1. Introduction A direct influence on second century Christian theology is the Jewish philosopher and theologian Philo of Alexandria (a.k.a. Philo Judaeus) (ca. 20 BCE–ca. 50 CE), the product of Alexandrian Middle Platonism (with elements of Stoicism and Pythagoreanism). Inspired by the Timaeus of Plato, Philo read the Jewish Bible as teaching that God created the cosmos by his Word (logos), the first-born son of God. Alternately, or via further emanation from this Word, God creates by means of his creative power and his royal power, conceived of both as his powers, and yet as agents distinct from him, giving him, as it were, metaphysical distance from the material world (Philo Works; Dillon 1996, 139–83; Morgan 1853, 63–148; Norton 1859, 332–74; Wolfson 1973, 60–97). The whole discussion from which the above is taken, is interesting. I could post more, but this post is long enough already. I hope that the above material is interesting and helpful. ZYD 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites