EU Privacy Complaint

[dwai]

6 hours ago, snowymountains said:

 

Instead of responding with profanities that public posts are public, please be mindful, what you want everyone to "get" is simply not in your discretion for EU citizens.

I’ve seen you use the term “profanity” multiple times in this context - I don’t think stating the obvious (public information is public) is profane in any way. To call it profane is inaccurate at best and a dishonest characterization at worst. 
 

Let me be clear - You are skating on thin ice with this line of belligerent behavior. I would strongly recommend you change your tone and consider recusing yourself from this forum if you cannot agree to the terms of membership. Let me know if you want your membership revoked and all your content deleted - we can do it quite easily. 

[snowymountains]

6 minutes ago, Shadow_self said:

 

Ill try asking again, more directly

 

is there a court case you know of that has a ruling that directly opposes the 2019 one?

 

Here I am talking specfically about the "right to be forgotten"

 

This is not a "gotcha" question, nor something that i am trying to start a conversation around or anything of the sort

 

Your post implied there was. If so I am interested to read it (for reasons related to the US constitution)

 

I cannot find any. So I am asking you if there are, could you post one please

 

I'll reply again, more directly. I gather you have a question as to why, technically, US companies comply with GDPR, I am not interested in having this discussion, that is not the intent of my posts. It's a different topic entirely.

 

Honestly, all I need is ask for my right to be respected and if I ever choose to exercise it, for timely compliance - and I shouldn't even need to cite GDPR for this, compliance responsibilities are sorely with providers, not with EU citizens.

[Shadow_self]

1 minute ago, snowymountains said:

 

I'll reply again, more directly. I gather you have a question as to why, technically, US companies comply with GDPR, I am not interested in having this discussion, that is not the intent of my posts. It's a different topic entirely.

 

Honestly, all I need is ask for my right to be respected and if I ever choose to exercise it, for timely compliance - and I shouldn't even need to cite GDPR for this, compliance responsibilities are sorely with providers, not with EU citizens.

 

I dont have a question at all.

 

I would just like to read the court case that overturns the 2019 ruling. You understand im an EU citizen? Im interested in the topic

 

Does it exist or not ? If not just say so and we can move on

[snowymountains]

55 minutes ago, dwai said:

I’ve seen you use the term “profanity” multiple times in this context - I don’t think stating the obvious (public information is public) is profane in any way. To call it profane is inaccurate at best and a dishonest characterization at worst. 
 

Let me be clear - You are skating on thin ice with this line of belligerent behavior. I would strongly recommend you change your tone and consider recusing yourself from this forum if you cannot agree to the terms of membership. Let me know if you want your membership revoked and all your content deleted - we can do it quite easily. 

 

When discussing about mod ignoring a fundamental right of EU citizens, the issue is with the word "profanity" ?

 

I want to be clear as well, if this site cannot show respect for a citizen right, then I want to have nothing to do with it.

 

Therefore, I am making a GDPR request.

 

Kindly note that this is not limited to deletion of my posts and revocation of my membership which you mention in your response.

 

Also, revocation of my membership has no impact on the requirement to fulfil the rest of the obligations by the site.

 

What also needs to be deleted includes quotes of my posts by other members, appearances of my username "snowymountains" in text, indirect references to it eg "snowy",

as well as references to my username.

This concerns both the boards and private chats between members.

 

Also kindly note that I am entitled to a communication of the date by which all of the above will have happened and that they need to be done in a timely manner.

 

 

[snowymountains]

57 minutes ago, Shadow_self said:

 

I dont have a question at all.

 

I would just like to read the court case that overturns the 2019 ruling. You understand im an EU citizen? Im interested in the topic

 

Does it exist or not ? If not just say so and we can move on

 

As I said previously, you can look these things up on your own. We have moved on.

[stirling]

As far as I’m aware, a number of users have been deleted and had all of their their content erased. I don’t see why any future member would not have the same request be honored. Is that not good enough? Don’t you actually have the ability to delete your own account, or edit your own posts? This whole contentious line of questioning strikes me as a non-issue.

[Shadow_self]

8 minutes ago, snowymountains said:

 

As I said previously, you can look these things up on your own. We have moved on.

 

I did. I cannot find one opposing that ruling to be honest

 

You seem to know of one, which is why Im asking you to post it

 

Thanks

[snowymountains]

1 minute ago, Shadow_self said:

 

I did. I cannot find one opposing that ruling to be honest

 

You seem to know of one, which is why Im asking you to post it

 

Thanks

 

I've said multiple times, I'm not interested in having this discussion. You searched, you reached a conclusion and you cannot understand why us companies comply, you'll have to find the answer elsewhere, not from me.

[Shadow_self]

10 minutes ago, snowymountains said:

 

I've said multiple times, I'm not interested in having this discussion. You searched, you reached a conclusion and you cannot understand why us companies comply, you'll have to find the answer elsewhere, not from me.

 

Im not asking you to have a discussion at all.  Ive reached no conclusion

 

I asked you for a link to a case that overturned the 2019 ruling specifically related to "the right to forget" that you are implying is there

 

You can just post the link and we wont need to speak further. No discussion needed.

 

I dont need to waste time looking, you dont need to have  discussion. Everyone wins

 

Like I said if it doesnt exist say so and we can happily move on.

 

If it does please post it. Id like to read it out of personal interest.

 

Thank you

Edited September 15 by Shadow_self

[snowymountains]

3 minutes ago, Shadow_self said:

 

Im not asking you to have a discussion at all.  Ive reached no conclusion

 

I asked you for a link to a case that overturned the 2019 ruling specifically related to "the right to forget" that you are implying is there

 

You can just post the link and we wont need to speak further. No discussion needed.

 

I dont need to waste time looking, you dont need to have  discussion. Everyone wins

 

Like I said if it doesnt exist say so and we can happily move on.

 

If it does please post it. Id like to read it out of personal interest.

 

Thank you

 

Sorry I'm not the one who will provide you the info you as to why US companies comply with GDPR. I've said multiple times I'm not interested in having this discussion with you.

 

Also kindly note that I have now made a GDPR request and have nothing to add to this thread.

My request is complete as-is and wish to add nothing to it, so I do not wish to add further responses to this thread.

[Shadow_self]

Just now, snowymountains said:

 

Sorry I'm not the one who will provide you the info

 

Right, so there is none, as I suspected

 

[snowymountains]

7 minutes ago, Shadow_self said:

 

Right, so there is none, as I suspected

 

 

You're knocking on the wrong door, believe what you want.

[-ꦥꦏ꧀ ꦱꦠꦿꦶꦪꦺꦴ-]

I’m not sure if thedaobums.com counts as a company that offers goods or services to EU residents, or monitors the online behaviour of EU citizens. 
 

source: https://www.enzuzo.com/blog/does-gdpr-apply-to-citizens-outside-the-eu

[Shadow_self]

50 minutes ago, snowymountains said:

You're knocking on the wrong door,

 

Excuse me? is this supposed to be a threat or something?

 

There is no court case that directly opposed to 2019 finding, and findings of that were clear

 

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/sep/24/victory-for-google-in-landmark-right-to-be-forgotten-case

 

 

Moreover lets get down to another thing you've overlooked

 

https://gdpr.eu/companies-outside-of-europe/#:~:text=The GDPR only applies to,GDPR may apply to you.

 

 

Im pretty sure the dao bums is neither enaged in professional nor commercial activity

 

@dwai @forestofclarity (for your information)

[snowymountains]

2 minutes ago, Shadow_self said:

 

Excuse me? is this supposed to be a threat or something?

 

No, you're just wasting your time and mine too, as I'm not interested in having this discussion with you.

 

2 minutes ago, Shadow_self said:

 

There is no court case that directly opposed to 2019 finding, and findings of that were clear

 

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/sep/24/victory-for-google-in-landmark-right-to-be-forgotten-case

 

 

Moreover lets get down to another thing you've overlooked

 

https://gdpr.eu/companies-outside-of-europe/#:~:text=The GDPR only applies to,GDPR may apply to you.

 

 

Im pretty sure the dao bums is neither enaged in professional nor commercial activity

 

@dwai @forestofclarity (for your information)

Yet, despite your links and theories, US companies and sites comply.

 

I do not need to provide any additional information to my GDPR request, which has been filed.

I will be waiting for the site to fulfil their obligations.

 

So if you don't mind, I won't be interacting further.

[Shadow_self]

3 minutes ago, snowymountains said:

 

No, you're just wasting your time and mine too, as I'm not interested in having this discussion with you.

 

Yet, despite your links and theories, US companies and sites comply.

 

I do not need to provide any additional information to my GDPR request, which has been filed.

I will be waiting for the site to fulfil their obligations.

 

So if you don't mind, I won't be interacting further.

 

Based on the  GDPR website funded by the EU (above) , It appears they dont have any obligation to you whatsoever

 

 

 

 

[-ꦥꦏ꧀ ꦱꦠꦿꦶꦪꦺꦴ-]

This is all very strange. It’s not like we are all using our real names, locations or other personal data. Why give the mods such a hard time over this?

[dwai]

1 hour ago, -ꦥꦏ꧀ ꦱꦠꦿꦶꦪꦺꦴ- said:

I’m not sure if thedaobums.com counts as a company that offers goods or services to EU residents, or monitors the online behaviour of EU citizens. 
 

source: https://www.enzuzo.com/blog/does-gdpr-apply-to-citizens-outside-the-eu

That’s a great point. TDB, afaik, is not a legal entity, and neither a not-for-profit, nor a for-profit organization. TDB is run by a bunch of member volunteers and paid for by an individual who does it from the goodness of their heart.

 

 

[dwai]

Snowy mountain has been permanently banned