Text Analysis: The AbraMelin

[Nungali]

Just now, Daniel said:

 

yes, this is very important to you.

 

another attempt at diversion . Not the issue at all . the issue is your continual false accusations

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

 

another attempt at diversion . Not the issue at all . the issue is your continual false accusations

 

what did I accuse?

 

can you quote it?

[Nungali]

1 minute ago, Daniel said:

 

Did I say he conjures harmful demons?

 

 

" Then, why are you conjuring harmful demons for yourself ?  "

[Daniel]

1 minute ago, Nungali said:

 

another attempt at diversion . Not the issue at all . the issue is your continual false accusations

 

all I see is an extravagant over-reaction

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

" Then, why are you conjuring harmful demons for yourself ?  "

 

"Then why..."

 

What is the precondition?  That comes from Jadespear's post.

[Nungali]

Just now, Daniel said:

 

all I see is an extravagant over-reaction

 

 

what I see is you trying to down play an obvious false accusation .

 

Go back to analyzing your demonic text  to prove to us how it is actually drawn from Judaism

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

 

 

what I see is you trying to down play an obvious false accusation .

 

Go back to analyzing your demonic text  to prove to us how it is actually drawn from Judaism

 

Jews aren't afraid of demons.  It's a perk.

[Nungali]

Just now, Daniel said:

 

"Then why..."

 

What is the precondition?  That comes from Jadespear's post.

 

endless stupid arguments , its here for all to see now .

 

I rest my case

 

 

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

I rest my case

 

wise choice

[Nungali]

1 minute ago, Daniel said:

 

Jews aren't afraid of demons.  It's a perk.

 

 

Daniel said  previously : " then, why are you conjuring harmful demons for yourself through your unwavering belief in ... harmful demons? " 

 

Classic !

[Daniel]

1 minute ago, Nungali said:

endless stupid arguments

 

Whenever you refuse to quote, I win.

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

 

 

Daniel said  previously : " then, why are you conjuring harmful demons for yourself through your unwavering belief in ... harmful demons? " 

 

Classic !

 

Jadespear presumed the existence of harmful demons.  I did not.

[Nungali]

Just now, Daniel said:

 

Whenever you refuse to quote, I win.

 

In your own mind Daniel .  Its very important to you to think you have 'won' isnt it ?

 

Even to the extent you embarras yourself  ... I am sure not in your own eyes though ... you probably get a feeling of 'winning '  .

[Nungali]

Just now, Daniel said:

 

Jadespear presumed the existence of harmful demons.  I did not.

 

No, you just write  long posts about them that no one is going to read anyway .

 

Whatever your motivation was for that .... it appears to have been forgotten and turned into yet another  Daniel denial train wreck of a post .

 

But hey ... as long as you 'won ' . 

 

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

In your own mind Daniel .  Its very important to you to think you have 'won' isnt it ?

 

It's useful.

 

You won't use the quote feature.  There's a reason for that.  it means you know that clicking the "quote" link on a post will show that you've misread and misinterpreted again.

[Cobie]

26 minutes ago, Daniel said:

 

it happens all the time.  People conjure their own demons so that they have something to blame.  The demon answers their call and gives them something to blame.  This is most commonly referred to as a self-fulfilling prophecy.

 

Exorcists contribute to this problem by encouraging their belief and encouraging the blaming.  It's a way to setup a dependent relationship with the afflicted.  Exorcists, particularly of the western-esoteric variety, tend to be charlatans very willing to accept money in return for validating their client's fears.

 

Among amateur-exorcists, it's more of a barter system.  They don't collect money, but they exchange validation for validation.  The afflicted gets validation of their fears.  The amateur gets validation that they have magical-powers.

 

Spot on. 
 

 

[Nungali]

5 hours ago, Daniel said:

 

It's useful.

 

You won't use the quote feature.  There's a reason for that.  it means you know that clicking the "quote" link on a post will show that you've misread and misinterpreted again.

 

Ha ! trying to bait me are you ?

 

Its rather ironic dont you think ... as that is exactly the way you have been carrying on here ; editing out things you quote, quoting a sentence or even lone phrase , selected so you you can then attack it , regardless of  who the poster is , so you can 'win' .

 

You should go back to doing your comparative text thing .

 

Note;   above , a full quote . As I nearly always do ,  and I asked you to previously  and what was your response ? 

 

You said

 

" I will do what I like ! " 

 

Edited December 3 by Nungali

[-ꦥꦏ꧀ ꦱꦠꦿꦶꦪꦺꦴ-]

3 hours ago, Nungali said:

 

Ha ! trying to bait me are you ?

 

Its rather ironic dont you think ... as that is exactly the way you have been carrying on here ; editing out things you quote, quoting a sentence or even lone phrase , selected so you you can then attack it , regardless of  who the poster is , so you can 'win' .

 

You should go back to doing your comparative text thing .

 

Note;   above , a full quote . As I nearly always do ,  and I asked you to previously  and what was your response ? 

 

You said

 

" I will do what I like ! " 

 

Do what thou wilt

[Daniel]

6 hours ago, Nungali said:

You said

 

" I will do what I like ! " 

 

I consulted the oracle.  It's response is repeating:

 

"try broadening your criteria".

 

Spoiler

 

 

 

 

 

[Daniel]

6 hours ago, Nungali said:

You should go back to doing your comparative text thing

 

I'm doing my best.  Your patience is always appreciated.

[Nungali]

11 hours ago, -ꦥꦏ꧀ ꦱꦠꦿꦶꦪꦺꦴ- said:

Do what thou wilt

 

I wish he would ... however that quote has nothing to do with ' I  will do what I like "  - a common mistake of those uneducated in such matters ; they take the divine principle of khvaraneh and try to use it to justify their base ambitions  and desires  and their  need to oppress others while they believe they have free reign OVER others and use that misquote to try and justify it  .  That too was predicted  ' they will make a great miss ' .

 

Just like this text uses the high ideal of communicating with the higher angelic aspect of the self  ... so one can see nekkid maidens .

 

I mean ... really !   Guys, just go to a nude beach !     (no need to do three months 'holy work' and hide behind a tree at the water-hole . )

 

But anyway .... carry on with the 'text analysis ' .... we can put its results up with Daniels finding from the 'what is Satan thread '  ?    

 

.

Edited December 3 by Nungali

[Daniel]

5 minutes ago, Nungali said:

I wish he would ... however that quote has nothing to do with ' I do will do what I like

 

What is it you wish me to do, and, how is that related to "do as thou will"?

 

Edited December 3 by Daniel

[Nungali]

 

 

12 minutes ago, Daniel said:

 

What is it you wish me to do,

 

Continue with your text analysis   to show us how this demonic text is actually a copy of Jewish ritual . 

 

That was your original declared aim wasnt it ? Oh yes, and in response to my other comment , also finish off your other threads that supposedly where leading to some conclusion ... that you  never did .  Oh, hang on, better make that just conclude , with an answer , your thread on What is Satan , where you promised and assured us  you where getting to some conclusion ( and not just starting that thread as a reaction  and a way of arguing with people to 'prove ' yourself right ) .

 

I suggest you DONT go back and conclude your 'argument'  where you  tried  the same on a mod and got suspended ... you better leave that one 'as is '  .

 

So,  just the Satan thread and this demonic thread then 

 

....  hmmmm , you seem fascinated by such subjects  ... curious in that you tried to blame that fascination on Jadespear   

 

 

and, how is that related to "do as thou will"?

 

It isnt , I  never suggested it was , that was someone else . 

 

Here , try these ;

 

 

 

.

Edited December 3 by Nungali

[Daniel]

1 hour ago, Nungali said:

That was your original declared aim wasnt it ?

 

If the pattern holds, you've botched it.

[Daniel]

1 hour ago, Nungali said:

It isnt , I  never suggested it was , that was someone else . 

 

Ah.  Thank you.  Your will is to tell me what to do. 

 

My will is to ignore the majority of what you say because of the obvious double standard:  "do as I say, but not as I do."

 

Edited December 3 by Daniel