AMA: Ask me anything

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

Nope .

 

YOU KNOW where you said that .

 

Lah de dar

 

Pics or it didn't happen.

 

 

[Nungali]

6 minutes ago, Daniel said:

 

If you want a response or a reaction, you'll need to quote what I actually wrote.  Anyone can say anything on the internet.  You have a track record of misrepresenting my words.  And you naturally exaggerate everything.  It's part of your personality, or something.

 

Here is an accusation you made.  It's very similar to what you're doing now.  "Daniel claimed ... ".  But, when we look at what I actually wrote, you've either magnified it in your own mind, deluding yourself, or, you're just lying to people.   

 

I'm going to type that again.  I'm going to increase the font so that hopefully you will get this correct if you ever attempt to recall it in your mind.

 

You've either  magnified it in your own mind, or you're lying to people.

 

 

 

 

 

---

 

And that is how to quote another individual so that their words can be read in context.

 

 

 

 

And this folks  ^ is how you cite a DIFFERENT post  to the one where he made the claim in the first place  ... what an old corny trick - that doesnt work 

[Nungali]

6 minutes ago, Daniel said:

 

Pics or it didn't happen.

 

 

 

Nope

 

you know it happened .

 

or have you been back to edit it out   

 

or are you now going to complain that accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?     

 

.

.

Edited 4 hours ago by Nungali

[Nungali]

and also THIS from a person that constantly does himself what he is now demanding from others .

 

I have asked YOU exactly the same , and ... nothing ... you just go off to another thread and continue the  'Daniel mode' elsewhere .

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

you know it happened .

 

Dude.  There's only one post where I've used the word "sinister".

 

Here's a link.  LINK

 

41 minutes ago, Nungali said:

But you claim I am 'sinister '

 

I did not say you are sinister in that post.

 

I said that you were describing the Jews as sinister.  Not you.  Here are my actual words.  Enlarged because you need the help.

 

[Daniel]

 

 

[Daniel]

7 minutes ago, Nungali said:

or have you been back to edit it out   

 

The thread is locked.  The post can't be edited.

[Nungali]

Nope

 

again you try to use a quote  that is not the one where you did what I said  you did .

 

I already showed how this tactic of yours is failing

[Daniel]

  On 11/2/2024 at 5:38 PM, Nungali said:

maybe go back to page 1

 

Ok

 

This is the first line on page 1.

 

  On 7/20/2024 at 3:42 PM, Nungali said:

This thread will show articles papers and videos that relate to the  construction of Judaism as a medium for an historical  political takeover

 

The subject of this thread is a historical political takeover.  Politics.

 

  On 7/20/2024 at 3:42 PM, Nungali said:

examine elements of the 'Jewish story' (claimed history )

 

This assumes that you know what is actually claimed.  If you don't, it's likely a straw-man.

 

  On 7/20/2024 at 3:42 PM, Nungali said:

an examination of Gods

 

This assumes that you have adequate understanding of Jewish theology.  If you don't, you're not discussing Judaism.  Straw-man.

 

  On 7/20/2024 at 3:42 PM, Nungali said:

the appropriation of other cultures story

 

You are accusing Jewish people of cultural appropriation.

 

  On 7/20/2024 at 3:42 PM, Nungali said:

history being massaged into Judaism

 

... Massaged ...

 

That's a sinister word choice.

 

  On 7/20/2024 at 3:42 PM, Nungali said:

the attempt to twist Egyptian history into their* own .

 

... Twist ...

 

Another sinister word choice.

 

OK.  The tone has been set.  This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise.

 

Got it.

 

 

[Nungali]

  DUDE !

 

You put up a post that shows YOU are claiming the Jews are being  accused  as being sinister

 

not that you claimed I was being sinister  !  

 

 

[Nungali]

12 minutes ago, Nungali said:

 

Nope

 

you know it happened .

 

or have you been back to edit it out   

 

or are you now going to complain that accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?     

 

.

.

 

WELL ????

[Daniel]

2 minutes ago, Nungali said:

You put up a post that shows YOU are claiming the Jews are being  accused  as being sinister

 

Yes, the Jews are being accused of being sinister.

 

52 minutes ago, Nungali said:

But you claim I am 'sinister '

 

I didn't claim you were sinister.

 

I sincerely hope you can distinguish the difference.

 

I was talking about the premise of your thread, using your own words.  I was not talking about you.  

[Nungali]

.. stop scrabbling around looking for dodgy 'get out of it '   quotes  in other threads and answer the question ...

[Nungali]

15 minutes ago, Nungali said:

 

So accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?     

 

.

.

 

[Daniel]

5 minutes ago, Nungali said:

not that you claimed I was being sinister  ! 

 

Nungali.  You cannot remember what you've typed less than 1 our ago.

 

[Daniel]

3 minutes ago, Nungali said:

.. stop scrabbling around looking for dodgy 'get out of it '   quotes  in other threads and answer the question ...

 

Nungali, you seriously cannot read the words on the page and understand them?

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Daniel

[Nungali]

19 minutes ago, Nungali said:

 

 

or are you now going to complain that accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?     

 

.

.

 

[Daniel]

Nungali, the right thing to do right now is quit.  I've shown you.  In the past you cannot accurately remember what I've written.  Now you've warped my words again.  That's 2 examples where you're wrong about what I've written.  And I showed you with screenshots.  There's no way for me to edit the post.  And if you ( or anyone else ) clicks on the link, they'll see it hasn't been edited.

 

And if that's not enough.  You've yet again forgotten what you've typed.  Last time it was less than 24 hours.  This time, less than 60 minutes.  Whatever you're doing to your brain, or have done to your brain in the past.... whew.  You have my sympathy.

[Nungali]

avoid  duck weave and deny

 

 

[Nungali]

1 minute ago, Daniel said:

Nungali, the right thing to do right now is quit.  I've shown you.  In the past you cannot accurately remember what I've written.  Now you've warped my words again.  That's 2 examples where you're wrong about what I've written.  And I showed you with screenshots.  There's no way for me to edit the post.  And if you ( or anyone else ) clicks on the link, they'll see it hasn't been edited.

 

And if that's not enough.  You've yet again forgotten what you've typed.  Last time it was less than 24 hours.  This time, less than 60 minutes.  Whatever you're doing to your brain, or have done to your brain in the past.... whew.  You have my sympathy.

 

That does not answer the question at all , it melerly diverts into Danielisms and thinlky masked insults .

 

again  and since you CHANGED your reference to what  I WAS talking about   and now merely seem to think that was insignificant  ... classic !

 

 

are you now going to complain that accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?

 

[Daniel]

22 minutes ago, Nungali said:

or are you now going to complain that accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ? 

 

 

The words were chosen "twist" and "massaged" because they describe a sinister undertaking.  This is consistent starting from the very first sentence.  I pointed that out, not because you're sinister, but because it puts your theory squarely into tin-foil hat conspiracy theory territory.

 

Does that make you a foolish?  Yes.  But not sinister.

[Nungali]

stay tune for a truck load of more red herrings and personal 'ever so nice'   ad hominems

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

since you CHANGED your reference to what  I WAS talking about 

 

Here's what you wrote.

 

 

And then 53 minutes later...

 

15 minutes ago, Nungali said:

not that you claimed I was being sinister  ! 

 

That's a direct contradiction, boss.  

[Nungali]

1 minute ago, Daniel said:

 

 

The words were chosen "twist" and "massaged" because they describe a sinister undertaking. 

 

 again, you use reference to points that are not referred to .   twist and massage have nothing to do with it .

 

 

This is consistent starting from the very first sentence.  I pointed that out, not because you're sinister, but because it puts your theory squarely into tin-foil hat conspiracy theory territory.

 

Does that make you a foolish?  Yes.  But not sinister.

 

Still cant answer the question eh .

[Nungali]

3 minutes ago, Daniel said:

 

Here's what you wrote.

 

 

And then 53 minutes later...

 

 

That's a direct contradiction, boss.  

 

Nope

 

Its a direct editing of my posts and then 'quoting them ' to try and desperately  protect Daniel for being wrong 'once in his life ' 

 

answer the question !

 

.

Edited 3 hours ago by Nungali