Daniel Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, Daniel said: This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise. @Nungali, I am seriously starting to wonder if you are struggling with reading words and understanding them in sequence. In the sentence above, which is the the product of the sinister conspiracy? Is the thread the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy? Or. Is Judaism the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy? Do you read it like this? Out of order? This thread is the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise about attacking Jews and Judaism. I wrote this: Can you see the difference? This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 2 hours ago " So accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ? yes or no ? " 2 hours ago, Daniel said: Choosing sinister words, is not a sinister choice. But I didnt ask you if choosing sinister words was a sinister choice ... did I ? Ohhhh Daniel ! I asked you " So accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ? yes or no ? " This guy just cant help himself ... it amazing ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Daniel said: Your thread is a foolish conspiracy theory where the villains are sinister. Therefore you chose sinister sounding words. That's what I wrote. it was not what you wrote ... you already cut and pasted that as your ' proof' , now you are changing it 2 hours ago, Daniel said: It doesn't get any simpler than that. That didnt answer the question either So accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ? yes or no ? ... That would make it a LOT simpler than this above 'answer ' . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, Daniel said: No. Thank you for answering . No more questions - over and out . Edited 2 hours ago by Nungali Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, Daniel said: @Nungali, I am seriously starting to wonder if you are struggling with reading words and understanding them in sequence. In the sentence above, which is the the product of the sinister conspiracy? Is the thread the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy? Or. Is Judaism the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy? Do you read it like this? Out of order? This thread is the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise about attacking Jews and Judaism. I wrote this: Can you see the difference? This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise. Oh ... I should mention this before I go , I nearly missed it . This is the second such time you cited a different 'sinister' claim to the one I first mentioned . I'm having none of the above as that was your claim and words not mine . Anyone that read that thread knows I said such massaging and rewriting of history is throughout ALL people's history . YOU where the one that started inserting sinister and specific 'attacks on Jews' . I was doing an historical , non faith based , non biblical 'history' accounts of what was observed back then .... bought to light by more and more people releasing cuneiform translations that are now being done becasue more and more people are learning how to do that . I know you feel affronted by this .. but so what ? Deal with it Daniel ! I have had to deal with re educating myself about the real history of my own culture and country .... and we tried to genocide the natives ! And yes, many here tried to raise their voices and 'academic opinion ' against it . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_history_wars Now, we can do the same thing with Christianity , with Islam and even with the Persian Zoroastrian redaction (its just that its contribution has been masked by 90% deliberate text reduction) . I am sure there are religious belief people out there that will defend 'historical' Christianity and Islam as well . Whatofit ? You gonna censor me ? put me on a gibbet ? of yeah ? ..... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Hallaj Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 2 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Nungali said: But I didnt ask you if choosing sinister words was a sinister choice ... did I ? That's because you're discussing some imaginary post that I didn't write. I didn't write about "sinister choices". 12 minutes ago, Nungali said: No more questions - over and out . Excellent choice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Nungali said: This is the second such time you cited a different 'sinister' claim to the one I first mentioned . No, you're probably not remembering what I wrote, or you have scrambled the words out of order. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Nungali said: YOU where the one that started inserting sinister and specific 'attacks on Jews' I didn't say Jews were being attacked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 2 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Nungali said: I know you feel affronted by this I don't feel affronted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Daniel said: I didn't say Jews were being attacked. you posted it quoting yourself 2 hrs ago from 4 hrs ago ! " This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise. " Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 2 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Nungali said: I have had to deal with re educating myself about the real history of my own culture and country .... and we tried to genocide the natives ! Thank you for sharing, but, that has nothing to do with me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Daniel said: I don't feel affronted. " " This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise. " Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Nungali said: you posted it quoting yourself 2 hrs ago from 4 hrs ago ! " This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise. " Thank you. Yes. The thread is about attacking Jews. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Nungali said: " " This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise. " It's not affronted. It's a fact. That's what you wrote in the thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Daniel said: Thank you for sharing, but, that has nothing to do with me. Of course ... it doesnt Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 2 hours ago Just now, Daniel said: Thank you. Yes. The thread is about attacking Jews. No, this thread is supposedly about you inviting questions , again YOU have made it into attacking Jews Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 1 hour ago 1 minute ago, Nungali said: Of course ... it doesnt Your necessity to relearn your own history has nothing to do with me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 2 minutes ago, Daniel said: It's not affronted. It's a fact. That's what you wrote in the thread. Oh did I now ? . Edited 1 hour ago by Nungali Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Nungali said: No, this thread is supposedly about you inviting questions , again YOU have made it into attacking Jews I was not referring to this thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Nungali said: Oh did now ? Yes, I quoted your posts. You probably don't remember. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 1 hour ago Regardless , you have done it . You have plastered all over this thread that I wrote posts to attack Jews . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 1 hour ago (edited) And thus ^ is exactly what you did before in your arguments with others here , regardless of the subjects . Time for a holiday . Edited 1 hour ago by Nungali Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 1 hour ago 4 minutes ago, Nungali said: No, this thread is supposedly about you inviting questions , again YOU have made it into attacking Jews It's important to read the quote and the reply in order to understand what was written. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Nungali said: Regardless , you have done it . You have plastered all over this thread that I wrote posts to attack Jews . You did. Your thread, in the first post, intentionally attacks Jews, accusing us of cultural appropriation, twisting and massaging history. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Daniel Posted 1 hour ago (edited) 7 minutes ago, Nungali said: And thus ^ is exactly what you did before in your arguments with others here , regardless of the subjects . Time for a holiday . I'm sure the staff will love to listen to all of your complaints. ^^ Sarcasm ^^ Edited 1 hour ago by Daniel Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
