AMA: Ask me anything

[Daniel]

1 minute ago, Nungali said:

stay tune for a truck load of more red herrings and personal 'ever so nice'   ad hominems

 

The right thing to do right now is quit.  Nungali, you cannot even remember what you've written less than an hour ago.  Obviously you won't be able to remember what I've written weeks ago.

 

Any rational person, at this point, would realize they needed to double check what was written before making statements about it.  The easiest way to do this is use the quote feature.  Your refusal to do so is.... unfortunate for you.  

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

Its a direct editing of responses

 

Here's what you wrote.   You're free to deny it.

 

 

This is the utility of the quote feature.   You can deny it, but, here's your words proving you wrong.   Everyone can see it.  

[Nungali]

still refuse to answer the simple question eh  ?

 

more red herrings ?  You better go fishing before you run out .,

 

 

[Daniel]

3 minutes ago, Nungali said:

answer the question !

 

I did.  But you can't remember it.

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

still refuse to answer the simple question eh  ?

 

If you restate the simple question, I'll show you where I answered it.

[Nungali]

No need , just simply answer this below  ;

 

So accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?

[Daniel]

1 minute ago, Nungali said:

No need , just simply answer this below  ;

 

So accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?

 

asked and answered 11 minutes ago.  Here's a link to the post:  LINK

 

 

[Nungali]

2 minutes ago, Daniel said:

 

If you restate the simple question, I'll show you where I answered it.

 

or did you mean 'where you answered it' wrongly  by  false quoting , then admitted it by 'finding' the right quote and then putting it up and then refusing to answer a question directly about what you DID say when you put up the right post ?

 

So the first wrong citation ( which you diverted from and glossed over being wrong about ) or the one you now admit was relevant  but are still refusing to answer a simple question on ?

 

 with more thinly veiled insults to suggest I cant comprehend what is happening here . 

 

lets see ' trying to sow seeds of self doubt ' , now I believe that is on the list for a particular type of personality that wa sonce exposed here .,....   ummm       by Taomeow perhaps ? 

 

[Daniel]

I'll note:  I originally typed:  "Does that make you a fool?  Yes.", but I decided to soften it. 

[Nungali]

2 minutes ago, Daniel said:

 

asked and answered 11 minutes ago.  Here's a link to the post:  LINK

 

 

 

So  after nutting that one out you now go back to it and still

 

refuse to answer  ... thatmust be a 'check' 

 

[Nungali]

1 minute ago, Daniel said:

I'll note:  I originally typed:  "Does that make you a fool?  Yes.", but I decided to soften it. 

 

Still does not answer the question . 

 

 This time its a 'hat in hand ' attempt at diversion  .. that wont work either .

[Nungali]

Are you now or have you ever been accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' ?

 

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

did you mean 'where you answered it' wrongly  by  false quoting

 

It cannot be false quoting if the the words match.  Literally.  Word for word, they match.

 

7 minutes ago, Nungali said:

No need , just simply answer this below  ;

 

So accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?

 

"making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?"

 

That is exactly, word-for-word, the question I answered less than 15 minutes ago.  It's not a big deal that you missed it.

 

 

It's literally the same words.  Word-for-word.   You already asked that same question, you even misspelled the word "were" the same way in both places.

 

[Daniel]

6 minutes ago, Nungali said:

refuse to answer

 

Asked and answered.

 

Here it is again.

 

"The words were chosen "twist" and "massaged" because they describe a sinister undertaking.  This is consistent starting from the very first sentence.  I pointed that out, not because you're sinister, but because it puts your theory squarely into tin-foil hat conspiracy theory territory.

 

Does that make you a foolish?  Yes.  But not sinister."

 

Here's the screenshot, again.

 

 

[Daniel]

2 minutes ago, Nungali said:

Are you now or have you ever been accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' ?

 

Yes, I'm sure it's happened at some point in my life.

[Nungali]

Its time for a joke ;

 

Ask me anything  ! 

 

" What is the capitol of  Kazakhstan ? "

_ " Dunno . "

 

" Why do people believe in God ?"

- 'Who cares ' ?

 

" Why did you say  we can ask you anything ?"

- 'Well, I actually never said that in the first place  ."

 

' Whats with all thes ebullshit answers ?

- 'Well ... I said you could ASK , me anything ... i never siad I would answer  with knoeldge, hoinestlky or even give an answer at all . "

 

" Then why set this up in the first place  ??? ! "

 

 

" ...

 

 

 

[Daniel]

I'll be available for questions for another 15 minutes.

 

If there are any that I've missed, please restate them now if they are important.

Edited 3 hours ago by Daniel

[Nungali]

3 minutes ago, Daniel said:

 

It cannot be false quoting if the the words match.  Literally.  Word for word, they match.

 

 

"making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?"

 

That is exactly, word-for-word, the question I answered less than 15 minutes ago.  It's not a big deal that you missed it.

 

 

It's literally the same words.  Word-for-word.   You already asked that same question, you even misspelled the word "were" the same way in both places.

 

 

Nope more diversion

 

still not answering the question  all you did was cycle back to  where you didnt answer it before and add some more top spin .  a simple yes or no will do

 

 

So,  accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?

 

you keep referring back to other woprds that are not 'sinister ' 

 

Its SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO  simple daniel 

 

 

So accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?  yes or no ?

 

 

[Nungali]

5 minutes ago, Daniel said:

I'll be available for questions for another 15 minutes.

 

If there are any that I've missed, please restate them now if they are important.

 

okay

 

 

So accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?

[Nungali]

[Daniel]

Just now, Nungali said:

still not answering the question

 

Your thread is a foolish conspiracy theory where the villains are sinister.  Therefore you chose sinister sounding words.  That's what I wrote.

 

It doesn't get any simpler than that.

 

 

[Daniel]

2 minutes ago, Nungali said:

So accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?

 

No.  It's not even an accusation.  Choosing sinister words is natural and normal for describing something sinister.

[Daniel]

2 minutes ago, Nungali said:

 

I'll give you another 15 minutes.

[Daniel]

OK.  Nungali, hopefully this is the end of "Daniel claims X, Y, and Z".  Even if it's true, people don't need your commentary to properly understand what I write.  If I'm wrong, people can tell.  If I'm being a dick, people can tell.  But the simple truth is, over and over, again and again, when I'm quoted properly, whatever it is you're writing **about me** is obviously exaggerated and often completely misunderstood.

 

So , please, just end it.  Attacking my character is making you look like a tool.  If you want to continue, we can do so here.  Otherwise, please smear me in private.  Is that too much to ask?

 

Edited 2 hours ago by Daniel

[Daniel]

39 minutes ago, Nungali said:

So accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?  yes or no ?

 

Choosing sinister words, is not a sinister choice.  You're making a syntax error.  Because of this, my original answer was not yes/no.  None the less, my original answer should have been sufficient.  I'll show you.

 

---

 

See the word "not", and the surrounding words?  Those words mean, "no, accusing you, someone, of choosing sinister words does not mean they were being sinister."  I needed to clarify because I didn't accuse you of making a sinister choice.  

 

1 hour ago, Daniel said:

The words were chosen "twist" and "massaged" because they describe a sinister undertaking.  This is consistent starting from the very first sentence.  I pointed that out, not because you're sinister, but because it puts your theory squarely into tin-foil hat conspiracy theory territory.

 

Does that make you a foolish?  Yes.  But not sinister.