AMA: Ask me anything

[Daniel]

1 hour ago, Daniel said:

This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise.

 

@Nungali,

 

I am seriously starting to wonder if you are struggling with reading words and understanding them in sequence.

 

In the sentence above, which is the the product of the sinister conspiracy?  Is the thread the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy?  Or.  Is Judaism the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy?  

 

Do you read it like this?  Out of order? 

 

This thread is the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise about attacking Jews and Judaism.

 

I wrote this:  Can you see the difference?

 

This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise.

 

 

[Nungali]

 

" So accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?  yes or no ?  "

 

2 hours ago, Daniel said:

 

Choosing sinister words, is not a sinister choice. 

---

 

 

But I didnt ask you if choosing sinister words was a sinister choice ... did I ?        Ohhhh Daniel !  

 

I asked you  "  So accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?  yes or no ?  "

 

This guy just cant help himself ... it amazing !  

[Nungali]

2 hours ago, Daniel said:

 

Your thread is a foolish conspiracy theory where the villains are sinister.  Therefore you chose sinister sounding words.  That's what I wrote.

 

  it was not what you wrote ... you already cut and pasted that as your ' proof'  , now you are changing it  

 

2 hours ago, Daniel said:

 

It doesn't get any simpler than that.

 

 

 

That didnt answer the question either 

 

So accusing  someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister  ?  yes or no ?  ...

 

That would make it a LOT simpler than  this above 'answer '  .

 

 

[Nungali]

2 hours ago, Daniel said:

 

No. 

 

You did it !  

 

Finally  !  Yay  Daniel 

 

Jeeze mate  ... you can go on .

 

 

Thank you for answering .

 

No more questions  - over and out .

[Nungali]

2 hours ago, Daniel said:

 

@Nungali,

 

I am seriously starting to wonder if you are struggling with reading words and understanding them in sequence.

 

In the sentence above, which is the the product of the sinister conspiracy?  Is the thread the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy?  Or.  Is Judaism the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy?  

 

Do you read it like this?  Out of order? 

 

This thread is the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise about attacking Jews and Judaism.

 

I wrote this:  Can you see the difference?

 

This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise.

 

 

 

 

Oh ... I should mention this before I go , I nearly missed it .

 

This is the second such time you cited a different  'sinister' claim  to the one I first mentioned .

 

I'm having none of the above as that was your claim and words not mine .     Anyone that read that thread knows I said  such massaging and rewriting of history is throughout ALL people's history .   

 

YOU where the one that started inserting sinister and specific 'attacks on Jews' . I was doing an historical , non faith based , non biblical 'history'  accounts of what was observed back then .... bought to light by more and more people releasing cuneiform  translations that are now being done becasue more and more people are learning how to do that .

 

I know you feel affronted by this .. but so what ?    Deal with it Daniel !

 

I have had to deal with re educating myself about the real history of my own culture and country .... and we tried to genocide the natives !  And yes, many here tried to raise their  voices and 'academic opinion ' against it .

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_history_wars

 

 

Now, we can do the same thing with Christianity , with Islam and even with the  Persian Zoroastrian redaction  (its just that its contribution has been masked by 90%  deliberate text reduction) .  I am sure there are religious belief people out there that will defend 'historical' Christianity  and Islam  as well .

 

Whatofit ?   You gonna  censor me  ?

 

put me on a gibbet ?

 

 

of yeah ? .....

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Hallaj

[Daniel]

16 minutes ago, Nungali said:

 

But I didnt ask you if choosing sinister words was a sinister choice ... did I ?

 

That's because you're discussing some imaginary post that I didn't write.  I didn't write about "sinister choices".  

 

12 minutes ago, Nungali said:

No more questions  - over and out .

 

Excellent choice.