Daniel Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, Daniel said: This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise. @Nungali, I am seriously starting to wonder if you are struggling with reading words and understanding them in sequence. In the sentence above, which is the the product of the sinister conspiracy? Is the thread the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy? Or. Is Judaism the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy? Do you read it like this? Out of order? This thread is the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise about attacking Jews and Judaism. I wrote this: Can you see the difference? This thread is about attacking Jews and Judaism as the product of an intentional sinister conspiracy to defraud and disenfranchise. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 13 minutes ago " So accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ? yes or no ? " 2 hours ago, Daniel said: Choosing sinister words, is not a sinister choice. But I didnt ask you if choosing sinister words was a sinister choice ... did I ? Ohhhh Daniel ! I asked you " So accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ? yes or no ? " This guy just cant help himself ... it amazing ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 9 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Daniel said: Your thread is a foolish conspiracy theory where the villains are sinister. Therefore you chose sinister sounding words. That's what I wrote. it was not what you wrote ... you already cut and pasted that as your ' proof' , now you are changing it 2 hours ago, Daniel said: It doesn't get any simpler than that. That didnt answer the question either So accusing someone of making a 'sinister choice' does not mean they where being sinister ? yes or no ? ... That would make it a LOT simpler than this above 'answer ' . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 3 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Daniel said: No. You did it ! Finally ! Yay Daniel Jeeze mate ... you can go on . Thank you for answering . No more questions - over and out . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites