Sir Darius the Clairvoyent Posted 7 hours ago And cobie, when you respond, try to use words and reason. I am open to hearing what you believe, but I don’t care much about manipulative tactics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Darius the Clairvoyent Posted 7 hours ago @Cobie I see that by responding with emojis you are unable to. That doesn’t give me much confidence to discuss this with you. But that’s okay, you have said bye to me a million times, but you keep comming back. Every time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blue eyed snake Posted 7 hours ago 5 hours ago, Sir Darius the Clairvoyent said: Another invention by Jews: Here is the translated text to English from the OCR-processed content: Text from Image 1: “The reality is that there is a very close connection. A letter that was once discovered (and reproduced in Revue Paris 35, II p. 574) provides, in a nutshell, an explanation for this apparent contradiction. The letter is written by a Jew: Baruch Levy to a Jew: Karl Marx, and it states: ‘The Jewish people will, as a whole, be their own Messiah. They will achieve their dominance over the world through the mixing of races among other peoples, through the abolition of borders, through the destruction of monarchy, which is the support of individualism, and through…’” Text from Image 2: “…the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will hold civic rights. In this new world order, the sons of Israel, scattered throughout the world, will bring the working masses under their leadership. The governance of the various peoples that will form the world republic will, through the victory of the proletariat, fall into the hands of the Jews without significant difficulty. Private property will then be abolished by the Jewish rulers, and all property will belong to the state and be managed by the Jewish rulers. Thus, the promise in the Talmud will be fulfilled, and the Jews, when the time of the Messiah arrives, will come into possession of power over all the world’s property.’” Not to mention the Russian revolution. How noble… edit: I did not provide the source as it is illegal information. The only mention of it you’ll find online is from a Jewish advocacy group «debunking» it. Judge for yourself: https://www.jta.org/archive/j-d-b-news-letter-219 That said, the Jewish connection to the Russian revolution is mainstream. Even Churchill says so: https://archive.org/details/ZionismVsBolshevismByWinstonChurchill many decades ago my parents taught me to judge people on their individual merites. In children's language: it does not matter what color or religion a kid has, as long as you can play together and have fun. I keep this advice close to my heart, whether that is jews, moslims, immigrants or whatever. you are judging a whole people forgetting you are talking about individuals, to me that's dehumanizing. I remember the lady that babysat my son, that son is probably older then you btw. she had no family apart from her parents, they survived the concentration camps and married, all their family was ruthlessly killed, she was an only child. Try to get what that means, take a moment ( or more) to let that sink in. That is an individual person that you hereby judge to be bad because she is from jewish descent she, and all other individual persons from jewish descent have no relationship whatsoever with what you write and to me your stance is morally indigestible. 3 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sir Darius the Clairvoyent Posted 7 hours ago 7 minutes ago, blue eyed snake said: many decades ago my parents taught me to judge people on their individual merites. In children's language: it does not matter what color or religion a kid has, as long as you can play together and have fun. I keep this advice close to my heart, whether that is jews, moslims, immigrants or whatever. you are judging a whole people forgetting you are talking about individuals, to me that's dehumanizing. I remember the lady that babysat my son, that son is probably older then you btw. she had no family apart from her parents, they survived the concentration camps and married, all their family was ruthlessly killed, she was an only child. Try to get what that means, take a moment ( or more) to let that sink in. That is an individual person that you hereby judge to be bad because she is from jewish descent she, and all other individual persons from jewish descent have no relationship whatsoever with what you write and to me your stance is morally indigestible. Sure, but I am not judging a whole people. A random jew is no more responsible for acts done by a sub group of the faith then I am for manifest destiny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
blue eyed snake Posted 6 hours ago 56 minutes ago, Sir Darius the Clairvoyent said: Sure, but I am not judging a whole people. A random jew is no more responsible for acts done by a sub group of the faith then I am for manifest destiny. Quote take a moment ( or more) to let that sink in. take more than a moment, take a day, a week, think this over, try to get what I mean, connect with it on an emotional level. grow up and learn to apologize. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
silent thunder Posted 2 hours ago (edited) Spoiler While D would have been wise to remain silent... I have come to truly appreciate it when racist ass hats reveal their nature openly. When that stuff festers in the dark, it's often more dangerous. That said... taking such a tone with one's racial pride flag waving fosters divisiveness itself and can be lacking in wisdom depending on the source and context. We're all humans making our way in the end. Some humanely, some not. But to overly distinguish and champion one culture, is a subtle form of violence in itself as Krishnamurti so succinctly put it. Quote When you call yourself an Indian or a Muslim or a Christian or a European, or anything else, you are being violent. Do you see why it is violent? Because you are separating yourself from the rest of mankind. When you separate yourself by belief, by nationality, by tradition, it breeds violence. So a man who is seeking to understand violence does not belong to any country, to any religion, to any political party or partial system; he is concerned with the total understanding of mankind. Jiddu Krishnamurti So did Floyd for that matter Edited 2 hours ago by silent thunder 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
