Sign in to follow this  
Ajay0

Phakchok Rinpoche on Dharma

Recommended Posts

A summarised teaching of Dharma by Phakchok Rinpoche...
 

https://tzal.org/quotes-by-phakchok-rinpoche/

 

  Quote

You have no chance of practicing Dharma (the Buddha's teachings) if you are not certain what Dharma actually is. So let me make this simple:

What is Dharma? Dharma is:
1.) Having a good heart (not causing harm, and wishing happiness and freedom from suffering to yourself and all other beings without bias).
2.) Tame the mind (practicing meditation baby).
3.) Realize the nature of mind.
4.) Stabilizing the natural state (which is enlightenment).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

there needs to be context to that quote (and any like it) since happiness and freedom for or to adharmic driven beings would be to destroy the protection that a master and local devas give to an order and its members from being attacked by such evil.   (the quote did say "all beings" which would include the lower and dark astral ones or similar but in human form)

 

the historic Buddha (and others) have said something similar above without the context I've mentioned

 

Edited by old3bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 2/3/2025 at 9:28 PM, old3bob said:

 

there needs to be context to that quote (and any like it) since happiness and freedom for or to adharmic driven beings would be to destroy the protection that a master and local devas give to an order and its members from being attacked by such evil.   (the quote did say "all beings" which would include the lower and dark astral ones or similar but in human form)

 

the historic Buddha (and others) have said something similar above without the context I've mentioned

 

 

I don't understand the first part? 

 

Wishing happiness for all beings is wrong on some level? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Did I say the link, no, and I almost never click on links.

 

  On 2/5/2025 at 11:33 AM, johndoe2012 said:

 

I don't understand the first part? 

 

Wishing happiness for all beings is wrong on some level? 

.

Did Rama do so during his battle with Ravana?

Did Jesus do so while routing the money changers from the temple?

Did the historic Buddha do so during his battle with Mara?

And there is this about Shiva: "Siva opened His third eye and burnt Kama. Thiruppariyalur is the place where Siva killed Daksha, through Virabhadra. In Thirukkandiyur, Siva punished Brahma, by cutting off one of his heads. In Thiruvirkudi, Siva, using a chakra, killed the demon Jalandhara".  Btw. why is Shiva depicted as being blue?

Did the Nuremberg trial wish the murderers and agents of the holocaust happiness and freedom, no.

Should C. Manson and the like be wished or given happiness and freedom, or answer to justice?

 

Etc. Etc...  thus some context that all is not peaches and cream, or only an above it all transcendent.

Edited by old3bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 2/4/2025 at 8:48 AM, old3bob said:

 

so another case of dropping a quote with no follow up?!

 

  On 2/5/2025 at 4:25 PM, old3bob said:

Did I say the link, no, and I almost never click on links

 

If you aren't willing to read the context he already provided, your criticism doesn't merit a reply...

The best reply to unwarranted criticism is often none, allowing space to host the critic's words so they can be felt and heard.

Sometimes the critic will recognize the inappropriate or unnecessary nature of their comments.

Sometimes not.

 

You don't need to click on the link, you could simply search or type into your browser.

It's actually a nice discussion, worth a few minutes of your time if you have interest in the subject.

In case you aren't willing to exert the effort, I've copied the page for you below.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 2/5/2025 at 5:29 PM, doc benway said:

 

 

If you aren't willing to read the context he already provided, your criticism doesn't merit a reply...

The best reply to unwarranted criticism is often none, allowing space to host the critic's words so they can be felt and heard.

Sometimes the critic will recognize the inappropriate or unnecessary nature of their comments.

Sometimes not.

 

You don't need to click on the link, you could simply search or type into your browser.

It's actually a nice discussion, worth a few minutes of your time if you have interest in the subject.

In case you aren't willing to exert the effort, I've copied the page for you below.

 

  Reveal hidden contents

 

 

idealism is nice,  nice but unrealistic, btw. that hidden quote in no way address's Justice per Dharma and karma or the examples I gave.

Why does Buddhism (and other eastern ways) have wrathful deities and what do they do?

Do Taoist masters/Sages let evil walk all over them and their students?

Did Gandhi only preach non-violence for all cases or did he say there may come a time to fight or be a coward?

etc. etc...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 2/5/2025 at 5:45 PM, old3bob said:

 

idealism is nice,  nice but unrealistic, btw. that hidden quote in no way address's Justice per Dharma and karma or the examples I gave.

 

Certainly it does, if you are open to a new way of looking and are willing to put some calluses on your bottom.

Idealism and reality can and do coexist. One can hold fast to ideals and allow them to guide one's life and still do what is necessary, even if it is in conflict with those ideals, when it is the best choice given the circumstances. No one is perfect. 

 

  46 minutes ago, old3bob said:

Why does Buddhism (and other eastern ways) have wrathful deities and what do they do?

 

They cut through your own obstacles and obscurations.

They destroy your own delusion of being an independently existing self.

Of course, to the uninitiated they can seem to be dealing with external forces but the practitioner knows it is all about their own mind.

 

  46 minutes ago, old3bob said:

Do Taoist masters/Sages let evil walk all over them and their students?

 

Daoism doesn't really teach that there are external evil forces in the world, does it?

It is more about misguided human action leading to imbalance and impeding the Way.

The sage recognizes this and finds the balance between good and evil in their actions.

 

  46 minutes ago, old3bob said:

Did Gandhi only preach non-violence for all cases or did he say there may come a time to fight or be a coward?

etc. etc...

 

Fighting when necessary and appropriate does not mean that one cannot wish, pray, dedicate, and work for the benefit of all living beings. Sometimes fighting is the best and only option. Sometimes a limb has to be cut off to treat a cancer or gangrene. The Tibetan Dob-dobs were fierce warriors, as were the Sohei of Japan, Sikhs of Punjab, Shaolin monks, etc...

 

Nowhere in the OP or linked page does it advocate for absolute non-violence.

The messages here go much deeper than that.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 2/5/2025 at 6:54 PM, doc benway said:

 

Certainly it does, if you are open to a new way of looking and are willing to put some calluses on your bottom.

Idealism and reality can and do coexist. One can hold fast to ideals and allow them to guide one's life and still do what is necessary, even if it is in conflict with those ideals, when it is the best choice given the circumstances. No one is perfect. 

 

They cut through your own obstacles and obscurations.

They destroy your own delusion of being an independently existing self.

Of course, to the uninitiated they can seem to be dealing with external forces but the practitioner knows it is all about their own mind.

 

Daoism doesn't really teach that there are external evil forces in the world, does it?

It is more about misguided human action leading to imbalance and impeding the Way.

The sage recognizes this and finds the balance between good and evil in their actions.

 

Fighting when necessary and appropriate does not mean that one cannot wish, pray, dedicate, and work for the benefit of all living beings. Sometimes fighting is the best and only option. Sometimes a limb has to be cut off to treat a cancer or gangrene. The Tibetan Dob-dobs were fierce warriors, as were the Sohei of Japan, Sikhs of Punjab, Shaolin monks, etc...

 

Nowhere in the OP or linked page does it advocate for absolute non-violence.

The messages here go much deeper than that.

 

Not true, Taoism and other ways recognize both internal and external forces to be dealt with.  (by all beings)  The transcendent is great but that does not mean the manifest is an illusion to be by-passed.  Sages/Saints/Great Masters/Sat Guru's have no evil (or such actions) left in them to balance out!?  Where did you come up with that odd idea?  Btw. I've heard the message that some "above it all type of people" speak of and what a delusional luxury that must be.   When the Red Chinese came to imprison or kill the true Dali Lama in Tibet he decided not to hang around and discuss wisdom and high philosophy with them and fled to India living to fight another day for Buddha Dharma and not for the happiness and freedom of those that were set on his demise;  wishing for same to someday come to happiness and freedom through right Dharma is different than wishing someone happiness and freedom as they are pursuing one's demise,  in other words doing that would be fools play in the sense or freeing them to destroy oneself which would make them happy.

Edited by old3bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dalai Lama on Bin Laden 

 

https://www.latimes.com/local/la-xpm-2011-may-04-la-me-0504-dalai-lama-20110504-story.html

 

  Quote

Forgiveness doesn’t mean forget what happened. … If something is serious and it is necessary to take counter-measures, you have to take counter-measures

 

Being a push over does not work in real life. 

 

Don't be too yin, it is imbalanced, my opinion. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  On 2/5/2025 at 6:54 PM, doc benway said:

 

Fighting when necessary and appropriate does not mean that one cannot wish, pray, dedicate, and work for the benefit of all living beings. Sometimes fighting is the best and only option. Sometimes a limb has to be cut off to treat a cancer or gangrene. The Tibetan Dob-dobs were fierce warriors, as were the Sohei of Japan, Sikhs of Punjab, Shaolin monks, etc...

 

 

 This is true. For example Guru Gobind Singh, the tenth Guru of the Sikhs  turned the sikh community into a martial one due to external persecution and tyranny . At the same time he had no hatred for the opposing army and soldiers.

 

As a warrior, he tipped his arrows in gold . His reasoning was that if the enemy soldiers his arrows killed were poor, their family will be able to extract the gold from the arrows to meet the expenses of burial rites . 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this