TTT Posted January 9, 2009 (edited) So what you guys think of the holy relationship between man & woman? Do you think it is more valuable than celibacy on the path? A lot of mystery schools are propagating this. Such as Samuel Aun Weor in "The Perfect Matrimony" , Shiva & Shakti and besides Adam and Eve were together in the Garden of Eden. www.reuniting.info Edited January 9, 2009 by TTT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
froggie Posted January 9, 2009 (edited) it is the way to go in my opinion. and untill you have found such a great match (in many things imo too) it's not a bad idea to not waste something but rather do something nice with it. (cultivation) and there are other things one can do, too, if you are an 'adolescent' or whatever (though i don't even like that term 'adolescent', it kind of has a negative tone to it.) So what you guys think of the holy relationship between man & woman? Do you think it is more valuable than celibacy on the path? A lot of mystery schools are propagating this. Such as Samuel Aun Weor in "The Perfect Matrimony" , Shiva & Shakti and besides Adam and Eve were together in the Garden of Eden. www.reuniting.info Edited January 9, 2009 by froggie Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mantis Posted January 10, 2009 it is the way to go in my opinion. and untill you have found such a great match (in many things imo too) it's not a bad idea to not waste something but rather do something nice with it. (cultivation) and there are other things one can do, too, if you are an 'adolescent' or whatever (though i don't even like that term 'adolescent', it kind of has a negative tone to it.) like what Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
froggie Posted January 10, 2009 (edited) like what Right..... alright then, let me try to recapitulate... (although i would prefer to stay on the intellectual side and leave the rest open ended.) anything that is fun and or nice, etcetera or call it anything that you want, doesn't hurt you or another, and is not specific to one thing only. (more like a 'world of alternatives', surrounding one kind of subject. (although ofocurse one can say to that also 'more or less', just to make things more interesting.....) call it creativity or creativeness? i don't think creativity has to stop after a certain period of childness. do you think? if someone needs to learn something about something it doesn't mean that only this thing is important. i'm just saying this as a general train of thought, or, conceptual way of expanded thinking. i don't know if it can be explained in relative terms .... although the outcome could be relative. or were you just trying to be unsuspiciously funny and weren't looking for a reply? either way, that's my reply to your question Edited January 10, 2009 by froggie Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
